WiFi

Both Galaxy Tab S devices support 2-stream 802.11ac and can negotiate up to an 866Mbps link speed with a similarly capable router. Peak performance in practice is pretty shy of what we saw with the Galaxy S5 however. While the GS5 was capable of around 430Mbps under best conditions, the Tab S averages around 240Mbps. Compared to the immediate competition it’s not bad, but against everything else we’ve seen it’s less impressive.

WiFi Performance - UDP

Camera

Samsung only gave us a few days with the review samples so I didn’t spend a ton of time focusing on camera performance. The rear facing camera is a 8MP design with F2.4 lens. The front facing camera shoots at 1080p and also has an F2.4 lens. In general the Tab S seems to be a decent shooter in well lit conditions. Low light performance isn’t the worst I’ve seen but it’s not a strong point for sure. Both tablets appear to use the same rear and front camera (Samsung S5K6B2) modules.


Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4 Rear Camera Sample

Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • theduckofdeath - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    The freebies are downloadable. Not pre-installed.
  • Lavkesh - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    It is not hard to see. My Galaxy S3 with a supposedly quad core cpu crawls most of the times, the phone hangs and crashes all the time and application uninstall at times takes minutes. It is for the same reason that Motorola took a jibe at Samsung when launching Moto E saying that doing basic tasks, it is faster than Samsung's Galaxy S4!
    There is no denying that their hardware is good, but their software just isn't good enough.
  • basroil - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    That video playback life is a best case scenario because they don't have a dedicated testing video... the web browsing one is more realistic for most people (mostly white), and it's frankly pathetic.
  • marytattoo - Sunday, June 29, 2014 - link

    still, cheaper to get the tab 8.4 pro. almost all of the same stuff and cheaper. i love mine. and no where have i seen a comparison between the s 8.4 and the pro 8.4.
  • basroil - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    Can Samsung legally call those screens 2560x1600? At best the chroma resolution is a quarter, maybe less depending on the screen controller. With the same train of thought, Microsoft's ClearType produces beyond 4K of resolution on their SP3...
  • GC2:CS - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    Yeah those subpixel origami makes a lot of mess but samsung is a marketing company and as they are unable to make an RGB AMOLED of ~300 ppi they have to "cheat" in some way. So they shouldn't call these 2560 by 1600 but they can and they do.
  • Penti - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    S-stripe is full-res RGB and not pentile. Only a few Samsung AMOLED-panels have been using uniform subpixels.
  • basroil - Wednesday, June 25, 2014 - link

    Normal S-Stripe displays from Samsung are indeed full resolution (RGB of 1:1:1), but if you look at the image of the new S-Stripe, you can see that it clearly has some sort of odd offset resulting in black space between every two-blue group. The count is the same 1:1:1, but are there actually 2560x1600 of those dots or only two thirds and the rest just imaginary subpixels?

    The 8.4 inch version though is 100% pentile and only has 1:2:1 and subpixel doubling (meaning the actual resolution is not much more than 720p). That's not to say that the pentile display will look bad, rather that calling it a fixed resolution above 1280x800 is a marketing gimmick and not a fact.
  • theduckofdeath - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    I'm honestly starting to wonder if you at all did read the review, or if you went directly to the comments section for the trolling, GG2:CS.
  • dwade123 - Tuesday, June 24, 2014 - link

    No one buys tablets for specs. Where's the software? Oh right. It uses Android.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now