The iPhone 5s Review
by Anand Lal Shimpi on September 17, 2013 9:01 PM EST- Posted in
- Smartphones
- Apple
- Mobile
- iPhone
- iPhone 5S
Final Words
The iPhone 5s is quite possibly the biggest S-update we've ever seen from Apple. I remember walking out of the venue during Apple's iPhone 5 launch and being blown away by the level of innovation, at the platform/silicon level, that Apple crammed into the iPhone 5. What got me last time was that Apple built their own ARM based CPU architecture from the ground up, while I understand that doesn't matter for the majority of consumers - it's no less of an achievement in my eyes. At the same time I remember reading through a sea of disappointment on Twitter - users hoping for more from Apple with the iPhone 5. If you fell into that group last time, there's no way you're going to be impressed by the iPhone 5s. For me however, there's quite a bit to be excited about.
The A7 SoC is seriously impressive. Apple calls it a desktop-class SoC, but I'd rather refer to it as something capable of competing with the best Intel has to offer in this market. In many cases the A7's dual cores were competitive with Intel's recently announced Bay Trail SoC. Web browsing is ultimately where I noticed the A7's performance the most. As long as I was on a good internet connection, web pages just appeared after resolving DNS. The A7's GPU performance is also insanely good - more than enough for anything you could possibly throw at the iPhone 5s today, and fast enough to help keep this device feeling quick for a while.
Apple's move to 64-bit proves it is not only committed to supporting its own microarchitectures in the mobile space, but also that it is being a good steward of the platform. Just like AMD had to do in the mid-2000s, Apple must plan ahead for the future of iOS and that's exactly what it has done. The immediate upsides to moving to 64-bit today are increased performance across the board as well as some huge potential performance gains in certain FP and cryptographic workloads.
The new camera is an evolutionary but much appreciated step forward compared to the iPhone 5. Low light performance is undoubtedly better, and Apple presents its users with an interesting balance of spatial resolution and low light sensitivity. The HTC One seemed to be a very polarizing device for those users who wanted more resolution and not just great low light performance - with the 5s Apple attempts to strike a more conservative balance. The 5s also benefits from the iOS's excellent auto mode, which seems to do quite well for novice photographers. I would love to see full manual control exposed in the camera UI, but Apple's auto mode seems to be quite good for those who don't want to mess with settings. The A7's improved ISP means things like HDR captures are significantly quicker than they were on even the iPhone 5. Shot to shot latency is also incredibly low.
Apple's Touch ID was the biggest surprise for me. I found it very well executed and a nice part of the overall experience. When between the 5s and the 5/5c, I immediately miss Touch ID. Apple is still a bit too conservative with where it allows Touch ID instead of a passcode, but even just as a way to unlock the device and avoid typing in my iCloud password when downloading apps it's a real improvement. I originally expected Touch ID to be very gimmicky, but now I'm thinking this actually may be a feature we see used far more frequently on other platforms as well.
The 5s builds upon the same chassis as the iPhone 5 and with that comes a number of tradeoffs. I still love the chassis, design and build quality - I just wish it had a larger display. While I don't believe the world needs to embrace 6-inch displays, I do feel there is room for another sweet spot above 4-inches. For me personally, Motorola has come the closest with the Moto X and I would love to see what Apple does with a larger chassis. The iPhone has always been a remarkably power efficient platform, a larger chassis wouldn't only give it a bigger, more usable screen but also a much larger battery to boot. I'm not saying that replacing the 4-inch 5s chassis is the only option, I'd be fine with a third model sitting above it in screen size/battery capacity similar to how there are both 13 and 15-inch MacBook Pros.
The lack of 802.11ac and LTE-A support also bother me as the 5s is so ahead of the curve elsewhere in silicon. There's not much I can see to either point other than it's obvious that both will be present in next year's model, and for some they may be features worth waiting for.
At the end of the day, if you prefer iOS for your smartphone - the iPhone 5s won't disappoint. In many ways it's an evolutionary improvement over the iPhone 5, but in others it is a significant step forward. What Apple's silicon teams have been doing for these past couple of years has really started to pay off. From a CPU and GPU standpoint, the 5s is probably the most futureproof of any iPhone ever launched. As much as it pains me to use the word futureproof, if you are one of those people who likes to hold onto their device for a while - the 5s is as good a starting point as any.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
464 Comments
View All Comments
ClarkGoble - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link
On OSX most apps are 64 bit. Developers I've talked with say you get a 20%-30% speed increase by going 64 bit. Oddly Apple's iWork apps are among the few on my system still 32bit. (And that'll probably change next month) With regards to iOS7 I worry that they didn't increase the RAM but will, for multiprocessing tasks, be having to load both 32bit and 64bit frameworks in RAM at the same time. I assume they have a way to do this well but extra memory would have made it less painful (although perhaps have hurt the battery life)DeciusStrabo - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link
Now, now, that's not really true any more. Taking my Windows 8 machine her, about 2/3 of the programs and background processes currently running are 64bit, 1/3 32bit. On MacOS it is more like 90 % 64bit, 10 % 32bit.name99 - Thursday, September 19, 2013 - link
You would get more useful answers if you asked decent questions. What does "bloat your program by 25" mean?- 25% larger CODE footprint?
- 25% larger ACTIVE CODE footprint?
- 25% larger DATA footprint?
- 25% larger ACTIVE DATA footprint?
- 25% larger shipped binary?
The last (shipped binary) is what most people seem to mean when they talk about bloat. It's also the one for which the claim is closest to bullshit because most of what takes up space in a binary is data assets --- images, translated strings, that sort of thing. Even duplicating the code resources to include both 64 and 32 bit code will, for most commercial apps, add only negligible size to the shipping binary.
Devfarce - Tuesday, September 17, 2013 - link
The performance of the A7 chip sounds amazing. Similar performance to the original 11" MBA is pretty incredible. Makes me realize that I have a 2007 Merom 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo in my laptop, that it's running Win7 32 bit (again!!!!) and that is within striking distance of the iPhone 5s. I don't even want to think about GPU or memory performance, I'm sure that ship sailed long ago with GMA X3100.tipoo - Tuesday, September 17, 2013 - link
Closing in on or maybe surpassing Intel HD2500 now at least, I think. HD4000 is still a bit away, probably within striking range of A7X.dylan522p - Tuesday, September 17, 2013 - link
Hopefully HD6000 is really good. They are doing a big design change then.Krysto - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link
Intel will be focusing mostly on power consumption from now on, not performance, even on the GPU side. Although I'm sure they'll try to be misleading again, by showing off the "high-end PC version" of their new GPU, to make everyone think that's what they're getting in their laptops (even though they're not), just like they did with Haswell.Mondozai - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link
You have no clue, Krysto.Devfarce - Wednesday, September 18, 2013 - link
I wouldn't say Intel is misleading on performance, however very few companies will demand the parts with the biggest GPU like Apple does. People just don't demand the parts with the big GPUs although they should. Which is why Intel currently sells mostly HD4400 in the windows Haswell chips on the market.But back to the iPhone, this is truly incredible even if people don't want to believe it.
akdj - Thursday, September 19, 2013 - link
Not sure you know what you're talking about. The 5000 & 51(2?)00 iGPUs are incredible. Especially when you take in to count the efficiency and power increase between its (Haswell) architecture in comparison with the HD4000 in Ivy Bridge. I think Apple's demand here is a big motivation for Intel to continue to innovate with their iGPUs...regardless of what the other 'ultra book' OEMs are demanding. They just don't have the pull...or the 'balls' to stand up to Intel. I also think Intel has impressed themselves with the performance gains from the Hd3000--->40000--->>4600/5&5100 transitions. As they progress and shut the gap of what a normal consumer that enjoys gaming and video editing (not the GPU guru that's demanding the latest SLI nVidia setup)...when directly compared with discrete cards, they'll enjoy a big win. Already the ultra book sales are being subsidized by Intel...to the tune of $300,000,000. I think they're motivated and Apple absolutely IS using the high power GPUs. Not the 4600 all others have chosen. The 5000s are already in the new MBA. The rMBP refresh is close and my bet is they'll be using the high end iGPU in the 13/15" rMBP updates. Hopefully still maintaining the discreet option on the 15"...but as the performance increase, in the portable laptop sector....I'm not so sure most consumers wouldn't value all day battery performance vs an extra 10fps in the latest FPS;). The 13" MBA is already getting 10-12 hours of battery life on Haswell with the HD 5000. And able to play triple A games at decent frame rates, albeit not on the 'ultimate' settings with anti aliasing. For those interested, they'll augment their day long use laptop with a gaming console. I think the whole big beige desktop's days are limited. We'll see. While I don't disagree Intel tends to embellish their performance...in this case, they're going the right direction. Too much competition...including from the ultra low voltage SoC developers making such massive in roads (this review is all the proof you need).