ASRock X79 Extreme11 Overclocking

Experience with ASRock X79 Extreme11

Overclocking with this board has mirrored a lot of the overclocking experiences of ASRock boards of late.  The automatic overclock settings are often stable with just a smidge of extra voltage to ensure stability, while manual overclocking can suffer from overheating VRMs causing declocks.  We get a similar scenario here.

Manual overclock options are all in the BIOS – unlike Z77 options, we only get the ‘CPU EZ OC’ option here which offers 4.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz on our i7-3960X processor in 200 MHz steps.  Each option provides a CPU voltage and Load Line Calibration appropriately, with a failed overclock either BSOD at boot or not even passing POST, requiring a ClearCMOS.

Overclock options are all essentially in the BIOS as well – the options via software are limited at best.  In the BIOS we are free to change the CPU ratio and multiplier in the main OC Tweaker menu, but voltages, LLC and memory are in other menus.  Each is easily navigable from the main OC Tweaker menu.

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).

Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.  We also are using Intel's All-in-one Liquid Cooler with its stock fan.  This is a 120mm radiator liquid cooler, designed to mimic a medium-to-high end air cooler.

Automatic Overclock:

With the CPU EZ OC setting options, each of them were selected one by one, then booted and stress tested.  Here are our results:

At the 4.0 GHz setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 5 (low) and VCore on Auto.  This led to a load voltage in the OS of 1.200 volts, with peak temperatures reaching 59°C during PovRay and 60°C during OCCT.

At the 4.2 GHz setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 5 (low) and the VCore to a +0.040 volt offset.  This led to a load voltage in the OS of 1.256 volts, with peak temperatures reaching 62°C during PovRay and 65°C during OCCT.

At the 4.4 GHz setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 5 (low) and the VCore to a +0.080 volt offset.  This led to a load voltage in the OS of 1.288 volts, with peak temperatures reaching 67°C during PovRay and 68°C during OCCT.

At the 4.6 GHZ setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 3 (medium) and the VCore to a +0.130 volt offset, as well as enabling PLL Overvoltage.  This led to a load voltage in the OS of 1.400 volts, with peak temperatures reaching 79°C during PovRay and 73°C during OCCT.

At the 4.8 GHz setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 1 (high) and the VCore to a fixed 1.440 volt offset, as well as enabling PLL Overvoltage.  This setting was not stable, resulting in a BSOD during boot.

At the 5.0 GHz setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 1 (high) and the VCore to a fixed 1.460 volt offset, as well as enabling PLL Overvoltage.  This setting was not stable, resulting in the board failing to POST.

At the 5.2 GHz setting, the BIOS set the CPU LLC to Level 1 (high) and the VCore to a fixed 1.500 volt offset, as well as enabling PLL Overvoltage.  This setting was not stable, resulting in the board failing to POST.

Manual Overclock:

For our manual overclock testing, we start with PLL Overvoltage enabled by default (as required by Sandy Bridge over a certain OC) as well as Load Line Calibration set to Level 1 (high) to ensure stable voltages.  We start with the CPU multiplier at 46x and a BIOS voltage of 1.350 volts.  Here are our results.

At 46x, the BIOS setting of 1.350 volts was stable, giving 1.344 volts in the OS at load.  This gave peak temperatures of 71°C during PovRay and 74°C during OCCT.

At 47x, the minimum stable voltage came from a BIOS setting of 1.375 volts, giving 1.376 volts in the OS at load.  This gave peak temperatures of 76°C during PovRay and OCCT.

At 48x, the minimum voltage stable came from a BIOS setting of 1.450 volts, giving 1.456 volts in the OS at load.  This gave peak temperatures of 84°C during PovRay and OCCT.

Beyond this speed, the system kept throttling down to 46x during load.  Even when options were changed in the BIOS – CPU Thermal Throttling was off and Power Limits were raised, the system still reduced the clock speed at load.

 

ASRock X79 Extreme11 In The Box, Voltage Readings Test Setup, Power Consumption, POST Time
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • puppies - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    22 USB drinks coolers for the crate of redbull you consume while doing an all night rendering session?
  • 08solsticegxp - Sunday, June 9, 2013 - link

    You can also use all those ports for USB rocket launchers to be warlord of the office.
  • bobsmith1492 - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    I regularly use up all my USB ports at work and have to use a hub. I'd love to have 22.

    Mouse
    Keyboard
    Software key dongle
    Flash drive
    External hard drive
    Multiple USB-to-serial converters
    Dev kit
    Programmer
  • martyrant - Tuesday, September 4, 2012 - link

    Why are you using a software key dongle?

    Your IT team should be able to produce a software license server, removing the need for USB keys.

    Multiple USB-to-serial converters? Are you serious? They have dongles for at least 4 of these from one USB slot, I've got at least 4 x2 slots lying around.
  • jigglywiggly - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    ppl here whine too much
    gr8 review
    :D
  • Performance Fanboi - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    ...but a $600 board should include Intel nics over Broadcom.
  • Iketh - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    It is very hard for me to read an article that refers to a company as plural. I have to pause every time i come to "ASRock have..." because it's so unnatural to read since it should be "ASRock has..."

    While I'm on the subject, I don't know which is correct... "an SAS" or "a SAS" ? I read "SAS" as a word so "an" is incorrect, but if you read it saying each letter, then "a" is right...
  • Iketh - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    -- , then "a" is right... --

    should be

    -- , then "an" is right... --
  • ggathagan - Monday, September 3, 2012 - link

    The British writing convention is to refer to companies in the plural.
  • Sufo - Tuesday, September 4, 2012 - link

    Well, a company is a group of people is it not? Rather than one single hive-mind. "ASRock" as a singular entity is simply a brand, and I don't like the idea that an abstract concept can make human decisions - technically, because it is impossible, but mainly because it is creepy... :/

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now