Internals


Opening this unit shows almost exactly the same interior as we have seen previously with Xigmatek or Thermaltake. Corsair changed a few things that are not necessarily easily visible. Let's first start with checking the layout. As we mentioned in the Xigmatek review, this power supply is in fact split into two halves. Each half acts as a completely independent power supply with 12V and a smaller voltage rail. The 5Vsb rail is generated within its own circuitry, which is located above the filtering stage on its own PCB. We have the filtering stage at the top with coils and capacitors and then we have a big rectifier bridge that has its own little heatsink in the top right corner of the picture. From there, the power supply splits in half and each side has its own primary stage containing amongst other things the PFC stage with some nice Japanese capacitors from Nippon Chemi-Con. Both are rated at 420V and 330µF at 105°C.

Each side has only one transformer where the 12V rail is generated. Each of the sides has a smaller rail of 3.3V or 5V split from each of the 12V rails. The difference from other similar units lies in the secondary stage. Competitors only have a few solid-state capacitors here, which are supposed to have a much longer life expectancy. Corsair has the complete secondary stage equipped with solid-state capacitors even for the smaller voltage rails. There are only two normal electrolyte capacitors hidden under the cables. The heatsinks are very small due to the lack of space, but they have a decent surface area through the use of many small fins. The inside looks very packed and there are some areas where the airflow will be restricted, but most of the parts will be cooled just fine.

Cable Management, Cables, and Connectors Testing with the Chroma ATE Programmable Load
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Powervano - Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - link

    Oh, my bad :-D Sorry Cristoph. But your new reviews are way better and I even think best of all :)
  • Powervano - Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - link

    Thank you! :)
  • piroroadkill - Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - link

    Sweet jesus, I did certainly not expect those graphs for the 3.3 and 5v lines, with even slight increases, and as for the 12v, well, it stays bang on target.

    Corsair, even though they've entered the market late, have seen issues with other PSUs and created the best PSUs in every segment - it seems they can do no wrong.

    Corsair, I salute you.
  • ineedaname - Wednesday, April 30, 2008 - link

    Don't forget that corsair PSU's are actually rebranded Seasonic PSU's
  • DrMrLordX - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - link

    Isn't the HX1000 a CWT unit?
  • Christoph Katzer - Thursday, May 1, 2008 - link

    Yes it is. Corsair buys from several companies...
  • Calin - Tuesday, April 29, 2008 - link

    Assuming a 500W draw on the wall socket, a change from 85% to 86% efficiency, the power lost inside the power supply unit (as heat) changes from 75W to 70W. While this isn't an important figure by itself, this can make is run cooler or be a bit less noisy.
    If you take into account the power delivered to the internal components (not the one drawn from the wall socket), this improvement in efficiency is (a little bit) better than that: for a 500W internal load, you would use 588.2W from the wall with the 85% power source, and 581.4W for the 86% unit. While the total difference is small (7W or so), it is still there.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now