Power Supply Quality

The electrical performance of the XPG Core Reactor II VE 850W PSU is competent, with effective voltage regulation across its outputs. However, ripple suppression on the 3.3V and 5V lines shows room for improvement, characterized as mediocre compared to industry leaders. The 12V rail exhibits a maximum ripple of 56 mV, and the ripple on the 5V and 3.3V lines measures at 38 mV and 34 mV respectively, indicating less stringent control compared to some high-end models. Despite this, the PSU maintains stable operation and matches the performance ratings advertised by the manufacturer.

Main Output
Load (Watts) 172.03 W 429.42 W 642.42 W 855.98 W
Load (Percent) 20.24% 50.52% 75.58% 100.7%
  Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts
3.3 V 1.99 3.3 4.97 3.3 7.45 3.28 9.94 3.28
5 V 1.99 5.06 4.97 5.05 7.45 5.04 9.94 5.04
12 V 12.79 12.15 31.98 12.13 47.97 12.1 63.96 12.09

 

Line Regulation
(20% to 100% load)
Voltage Ripple (mV)
20% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load CL1
12V
CL2
3.3V + 5V
3.3V 0.5% 14 24 30 34 18 32
5V 0.3% 12 20 26 38 16 28
12V 0.5% 16 26 32 56 48 30

During our thorough assessment, we evaluate the essential protection features of every power supply unit we review, including Over Current Protection (OCP), Over Voltage Protection (OVP), Over Power Protection (OPP), and Short Circuit Protection (SCP). The XPG Core Reactor II VE 850W PSU passed all critical protection tests, proving its capability to safeguard against scenarios that could compromise the PSU or connected components. The unit showed slightly loosely calibrated Over Current Protection (OCP) for the 3.3V and 5V rails, activating at 136% and 138% respectively, which is high but remains within acceptable limits. The 12V rail’s OCP activation at 146% is extremely high but we are not surprised considering the need of manufacturers to comply with the power excursion design guide requirements.

Conclusion

The XPG Core Reactor II VE 850W PSU distinguishes itself as the first ATX 3.1-compliant unit from XPG, setting a benchmark in the power supply landscape with its adherence to the latest standards. Priced at an MSRP of $119 and likely to retail for significantly less, this power supply unit blends high-quality performance, robust construction, and a price point that appeals to a broad spectrum of users. Manufactured by the reputable Channel-Well Technologies, the unit benefits from expert craftsmanship, enhancing its durability and ensuring it stands up to the rigors of daily use. The provision of a 7-year warranty by XPG further emphasizes their confidence in the PSU's long-term reliability.

In terms of performance, the XPG Core Reactor II VE 850W does very well, achieving impressive efficiency ratings that greatly exceed the requirements for 80Plus Gold certification, recording average nominal load efficiencies of 90.9% on 115 VAC and 91.7% on 230 VAC. Power quality is great too, with fantastic voltage regulation on all lines and good filtering on the primary 12V line. Despite its strengths, it is worth mentioning that the unit does exhibit only moderate ripple suppression on the 3.3V and 5V lines, which may be adequate but not on par with other high tier products.

Thermal management in the Core Reactor II VE is acceptable, mostly thanks to its powerful 120 mm fan, which effectively dissipates heat across varying loads. However, the unit's electrical performance does show signs of degradation under extreme conditions due to thermal stress, particularly when operating near full capacity in higher ambient temperatures. This aspect is crucial for users to consider, especially those in warmer climates or with high-load applications, as it impacts both performance and noise levels, with the latter increasing significantly under heavy loads.

In conclusion, the XPG Core Reactor II VE 850W PSU is a significant release, being the first to meet ATX 3.1 specifications, seemingly offering forward-looking compatibility with next-generation hardware. The balance of cost, capabilities, and the extended warranty make it an attractive option for a wide range of users, from gamers to professional workstation builders. While it performs admirably across most parameters, potential buyers should weigh the implications of its poor performance under adverse operating conditions. Still, its performance metrics under typical operating conditions and quality make it a worthy investment for those who want a balanced product that does not break the bank.

Hot Test Results (~45°C Ambient Temperature)
POST A COMMENT

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • meacupla - Friday, May 3, 2024 - link

    Fire extinguisher for $40~50 is going to be like 1/100th the cost of a 5090, so it's a good investment. Reply
  • PeachNCream - Friday, May 3, 2024 - link

    Funny, I don't recall my phone or laptop needing a power connector dedicated to the graphics capability. They both still seem perfectly capable of running Candy Crush, oddly enough. Reply
  • charlesg - Friday, May 3, 2024 - link

    Based on your prior comments, it appears you are quite computer literate. Or know how to use ChatGPT well.

    Therefore I'm surprised you don't know we're talking about a PSU that is used on "above average" capability computers, and not a phone or laptop?

    And not necessarily even computers that are used to play Candy Crush!
    Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, May 4, 2024 - link

    I think he makes a good point: isn't it rather ridiculous that high-end GPUs use so much power that they need a connector of their own? The phone, in contrast, can do a fair bit of graphics with merely a battery.

    It's the idea that budget hardware can, at a fraction of the power or cost, do 60, 70, 80% of what expensive, high-end hardware can. It's not too far from thinking in a Core-Zen fashion instead of Netburst.
    Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, May 6, 2024 - link

    No? Nothing is stopping you from gaming on a GT 1030. Why should GPUs stop scaling at an arbitrary point?

    you know what's ridiculous? Comparing a multi teraflop processing unit to a cell phone then pontificating about power use.
    Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, May 6, 2024 - link

    Fair enough. Let GPUs use the power needed to achieve their performance levels. It's better we have these than not. On the other side, many people will go on playing quite happily on phones and portable devices. I know a 'teen who games all the time on the Switch, running it on the TV too like a console. Sure, the framerates and graphics weren't the best, but not that bad either.

    A somewhat unrelated question: how much has graphics in games improved, despite the advances in hardware?
    Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Monday, May 6, 2024 - link

    I admit my phrasing the other day wasn't the best, and thank you for pointing it out. I still stand by the notion that hardware outside the high end can do much. Reply
  • Threska - Monday, May 6, 2024 - link

    Tune into the gamedev channels on YT and you'll see it has improved quite a bit. Lots of math and that's what GPUs do best. Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Tuesday, May 7, 2024 - link

    Thanks. It just seems to my eyes that the gains haven't been commensurate with the hardware. Crysis 3 had a big part of today's graphics a decade ago. Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, May 6, 2024 - link

    Cool. Run Helldivers 2 on your phone and let me know how it goes. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now