CPU Benchmark Performance: Legacy Tests

In order to gather data to compare with older benchmarks, we are still keeping a number of tests under our ‘legacy’ section. This includes all the former major versions of CineBench (R15, R11.5, R10) as well as Geekbench 4 and 5. We won’t be transferring the data over from the old testing into Bench, otherwise, it would be populated with 200 CPUs with only one data point, so it will fill up as we test more CPUs like the others.

We are using DDR5 memory on the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X, as well as Intel's 12th Gen (Alder Lake) processors at the following settings:

  • DDR5-5200 CL44- Ryzen 7000
  • DDR5-4800 (B) CL40 - Intel 12th Gen

All other CPUs such as Ryzen 5000 and 3000 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4.

Legacy

(6-1a) CineBench R10 ST

(6-1b) CineBench R10 MT

(6-2a) CineBench R11.5 ST

(6-2b) CineBench R11.5 MT

(6-3a) CineBench R15 ST

(6-3b) CineBench R15 MT

(8-1a) Geekbench 4.0 ST

(8-1b) Geekbench 4.0 MT

(8-1c) Geekbench 5 Single Thread

(8-1d) Geekbench 5 Multi-Thread

In our fabled and older school selection of benchmarks passed their 'sell by date', the Ryzen 9 7950X wins in every one of these tests, both single-threaded and multi-threaded. In the purely single-threaded tests, the Ryzen 5 7600X is the next best, although it is more in line with the Ryzen 7 5800X as we've consistently seen in our multi-threaded results all throughout this review.

CPU Benchmark Performance: Rendering Gaming Performance: 720p and Lower
POST A COMMENT

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • spaceship9876 - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    1. I was hoping you would use a new build of 7-zip as you are using an old version.
    2. I was hoping you were going to test the idle power consumption when using eco mode so we could compare.
    Reply
  • boozed - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Sweet Baby Jesus. Reply
  • Arbie - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    I would really have liked to see Cinebench R23 multi with the 7950X in "105W" mode, for a more direct comparison to the 5950X. But thanks for all the work you did do here, of course. Reply
  • nandnandnand - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    22% better at 65W, 49.7% better at 170W. I'll guess 35-40%. Reply
  • Rezurecta - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Absolutely great review!! I love the architectural focus of these articles rather than the '0-60 like' benchmarks of every other site! Would love a memory scaling post as well! Reply
  • aparangement - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Would it be better if using 32GB*2 memory instead of 16*2?

    I remember that Anandtech did a benchmark showing that 32*2 has performance advantage (maybe just using the same kit as in 12900K review? https://www.anandtech.com/show/17047/the-intel-12t...
    Reply
  • Jboy1450 - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Seems like you handicapped the Zen4 on purpose.Why would you not test at the AMD recommended memory settings? That's what the average user is actually going to use as AMD made it so easy to do. Also, what's with tested with a 2080 ti? Very disappointed and surprised that a well regarded site like yours would make such incomprehensible decisions. Biased maybe? Seems that way. Reply
  • boozed - Monday, September 26, 2022 - link

    Not everything has to be a conspiracy Reply
  • Jboy1450 - Tuesday, September 27, 2022 - link

    I agree, but coming to a conclusion on a platform where performance is deliberately left on the table (aside from overclocking or using PBO) seems disingenuous. By the same token, why not test AL with DDR4 since most users tend to be budget conscious and will probably choose it over the more expensive DDR5?

    I mean, I'm simply using their logic.
    Reply
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, September 27, 2022 - link

    ‘Most users’ has never been a logical basis for an enthusiast site. It never will be. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now