CPU Tests: SPEC MT Performance - DDR5 Advantage

Multi-threaded performance is where things become very interesting for Alder Lake, where the chip can now combine its 8 P-cores with its 8 E-cores. As we saw, the 8 E-cores are nothing to sneeze about, but another larger consideration for MT performance is DDR5. While in the ST results we didn’t see much change in the performance of the cores, in MT scenarios when all cores are hammering the memory, having double the memory channels as well as +50% more bandwidth is going to be extremely beneficial for Alder Lake.

SPECint2017 Rate-N Estimated Scores

As we noted, the DDR5 vs DDR4 results showcase a very large performance gap between the two memory technologies in MT scenarios. Running a total of 24 threads, 16 for the SMT-enabled P-cores, and 8 for the E-cores, Alder Lake is able to take the performance crown in quite a lot of the workloads. There are still cases where AMD’s 16-core setup with larger cores are able to perform better, undoubtedly also partly attributed to 64MB of on-chip cache.

Compared to the 11900K, the new 12900K showcases giant leaps, especially when paired with DDR5.

SPECfp2017 Rate-N Estimated Scores

In the FP suite, the DDR5 advantage in some workloads is even larger, as the results scale beyond that of the pure theoretical +50% bandwidth improvement. What’s important for performance is not just the theoretical bandwidth, but the actual utilised bandwidth, and again, the doubled up memory channels of DDR5 here are seemingly contributing to extremely large increases, if the workload can take advantage of it.

SPEC2017 Rate-N Estimated Total

In the aggregate results, there’s very clearly two conclusions, depending on whether you use the chip with DDR5 or DDR4.

With DDR4, Alder Lake and the 12900K in particular, is able to showcase very good and solid increases in performance, thanks to the IPC gains on the Golden Cove core, but most importantly, also thanks to the extra 8 Gracemont cores, which do carry their own weight. The 12900K falls behind AMD’s 5900X with DDR4, which is fair given the pricing of the chips here are generally in line with teach other.

With DDR5, the 12900K is able to fully stretch its multi-threaded performance legs. In less memory dependent workloads, the chip battles it out with AMD’s 16-core 5950X, winning some workloads, losing some others. In more memory dependent workloads, the DDR5 advantage is extremely clear, and the 12900K is able to blow past any competition, even slightly edging out the latest Apple M1 Max, released a few weeks ago, and notable for its memory bandwidth.

CPU Tests: SPEC ST Performance on P-Cores & E-Cores CPU Tests: SPEC MT Performance - P and E-Core Scaling
Comments Locked

474 Comments

View All Comments

  • blanarahul - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    "Using all the eight E-cores, at 3.9 GHz, brings the package power up to 48 W total."

    This sounds amazing for inexpensive (i3 class) laptop processors since Gracemont sips power and doesn't take much die space.
  • Great_Scott - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    I'd actually prefer a all-Gracemont CPU for Laptops. Seems like it would be better for intentionally maximizing battery life. Skylake+ level performance is perfect for most use cases.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Indeed, they have it backwards for laptops, it should be 2-6 gracemont cores then 1-2 power cores for a CPU, not the other way around.
  • karmapop - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    I'm guessing you missed the articles describing the two separate mobile dies for Alder Lake? We've got Alder Lake-P (6P + 8E) for performance mobile designs, and Alder Lake-M (2P + 8E) for the ultra mobile low power SKUs.
  • at_clucks - Saturday, November 6, 2021 - link

    I'm very happy with exactly-Skylake-level performance in my desktop :). I'd more than gladly take the same performance and cut the power in half. I'm sure there's quite a big market for that kind of performance in a lower powered package regardless of form factor (mobile, desktop).
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, November 9, 2021 - link

    There really is. I may well pick up a 2P+8E ADL laptop, but a desktop box would suit me better
  • mode_13h - Wednesday, November 10, 2021 - link

    Keep an eye on ASRock. They sell mini-ITX motherboards with that class of SoC.

    https://www.asrock.com/mb/index.us.asp#Intel%20CPU
  • Spunjji - Friday, November 5, 2021 - link

    That's actually not great in power terms compared to what AMD can do with 8 Zen 3 cores on TSMC N7 - but yeah, in the context of die area, something built around (say) 2 P cores and 4 E cores can probably put in a very good showing for inexpensive devices.
  • Netmsm - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Becomes competitive to previous AMD's.
  • EnglishMike - Thursday, November 4, 2021 - link

    Previous AMDs support DDR5 and PCR 5.0?

    Huh. That one slipped by me...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now