CPU ST Performance: Not Much Change from M1

Apple didn’t talk much about core performance of the new M1 Pro and Max, and this is likely because it hasn’t really changed all that much compared to the M1. We’re still seeing the same Firestrom performance cores, and they’re still clocked at 3.23GHz. The new chip has more caches, and more DRAM bandwidth, but under ST scenarios we’re not expecting large differences.

When we first tested the M1 last year, we had compiled SPEC under Apple’s Xcode compiler, and we lacked a Fortran compiler. We’ve moved onto a vanilla LLVM11 toolchain and making use of GFortran (GCC11) for the numbers published here, allowing us more apple-to-apples comparisons. The figures don’t change much for the C/C++ workloads, but we get a more complete set of figures for the suite due to the Fortran workloads. We keep flags very simple at just “-Ofast” and nothing else.

SPECint2017 Rate-1 Estimated Scores

In SPECint2017, the differences to the M1 are small. 523.xalancbmk is showcasing a large performance improvement, however I don’t think this is due to changes on the chip, but rather a change in Apple’s memory allocator in macOS 12. Unfortunately, we no longer have an M1 device available to us, so these are still older figures from earlier in the year on macOS 11.

Against the competition, the M1 Max either has a significant performance lead, or is able to at least reach parity with the best AMD and Intel have to offer. The chip however doesn’t change the landscape all too much.

SPECfp2017 Rate-1 Estimated Scores

SPECfp2017 also doesn’t change dramatically, 549.fotonik3d does score quite a bit better than the M1, which could be tied to the more available DRAM bandwidth as this workloads puts extreme stress on the memory subsystem, but otherwise the scores change quite little compared to the M1, which is still on average quite ahead of the laptop competition.

SPEC2017 Rate-1 Estimated Total

The M1 Max lands as the top performing laptop chip in SPECint2017, just shy of being the best CPU overall which still goes to the 5950X, but is able to take and maintain the crown from the M1 in the FP suite.

Overall, the new M1 Max doesn’t deliver any large surprises on single-threaded performance metrics, which is also something we didn’t expect the chip to achieve.

Power Behaviour: No Real TDP, but Wide Range CPU MT Performance: A Real Monster
Comments Locked

493 Comments

View All Comments

  • techconc - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    So Apple reported 3rd party results of a test and the 3rd party provided full disclosure of test conditions. That’s as close as you can get to say Apple cheated?

    To me, cheating is like we see on Android phones where the OEM looks for the existence of a specific benchmark and performs differently just for that benchmark.
  • steven4570 - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    "If you are into benchmarks Apple is a great thing for you to buy."

    Lol, k
  • daveinpublic - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    Amazing how many salty Android/Windows fans there are here.

    Don't worry you guys, Google is working on designing their own silicon, Microsoft will soon. Then you can fawn over the new chips once you have your own.
  • Lavkesh - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    Seriously. These android and windows shrills are worse than barking dog running behind a car.
  • AshlayW - Tuesday, October 26, 2021 - link

    You are aware of how Apple treats consumers, right? I mean, its awfully distasteful to be supporting a company that get sued for not honouring legal warranty requirements.
  • melgross - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    Abe you’re thinking of Intel. Apple didn’t cheat on benchmarks. Point out an actual cheat.
  • sirmo - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    They allegedly cheated by tweaking register settings: https://www.theregister.com/2003/06/24/apple_accus...
  • web2dot0 - Tuesday, October 26, 2021 - link

    17years ago 😂

    We’re you born back then?
  • sirmo - Tuesday, October 26, 2021 - link

    I had a G3 mac. Still do in fact.
  • easp - Monday, October 25, 2021 - link

    Huh? Apple has long de-emphasized benchmarks. That may be changing a little for the Mac line now that they aren't using the same silicon as all the other PC makers, but their phone SoC's have been exclusive for, what, a decade, and they have't leaned into benchmarks.

    Benchmarking well isn't the same thing as optimizing for benchmarks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now