Package Improvements

As we move to smaller process nodes, the thermal density of high-performance silicon becomes more of an issue, and so all the processor companies put resources into their mechanical design teams to come up with a solution for the best thermal performance but also comes in line with costs. For example, we’ve seen Intel over the years transition from a soldered down heatspreader, to liquid metal, to basic thermal paste (because saving 0.1 cents means a lot across 70m CPUs), and then all the way back again when customers started demanding it.

However, in that time, we’ve pretty much kept the same socket design for mainstream processors. There hasn’t been much emphasis on changing the design itself for thermomechanical improvements in order to retain reuse and compatibility. There have been some minor changes here and there, such as substrate thinning, but nothing that substantial. The move to a new socket for Alder Lake now gives Intel that opportunity.

For Alder Lake, Intel is using an optimized packaging process to reduce the amount of soldered thermal material used in the processors. Combining that with a thinner die, and Intel is having to increase the thickness of the heatspreader to maintain the required z-height for the platform. The idea here is that the limiting factor in the cooling solution is any time we have a thermal interface, from one material to another – in this case, die to solder, and solder to heatspreader. Solder is the weak point here, so if the heatspreader gets thicker to meet the die, then less solder is needed.

Ultimately direct-die liquid cooling would be the boon here, but Intel has to come up with a solution that fits millions of processors. We have seen Intel offer different packaging solutions based on the SKU itself, so it will be interesting if the mid-range still get the Thin Die + Thin STIM treatment, or if they’ll go back to the cheap thermal paste.

Overclocking: We Have Headroom

It wouldn’t be too much of a leap to say that for most users, the only useful overclocking they might want to look at is enabling XMP on their memory. Modern processors these days are so close to their actual voltage and thermal limits out of the box these days that even if there was 200-300 MHz to gain, especially for the top Core i9 parts, it wouldn’t be worth the +100W it produces. I’m also getting to an age now where I prefer a good stable system, rather than eking out every frame, but having lived in the competitive OC scene for a while, I understand the drive that a lot of those users have to go above and beyond. To that end, Intel is introducing a few new features, and reviving some old ones, for Alder Lake.

Alder Lake also complicates things a bit with the P-core and E-core design.

To start, all the cores on the K/KF parts can be overclocked. The P-cores can be overclocked individually, whereas the E-cores are in groups of four. All the E-cores can be disabled, but at least one P-core needs to be enabled for the system to work (this has interesting consequences for Intel’s design). All cores can have additional AVX offsets, per-core ratio and voltage controls, and the ring/uncore ratios can also be adjusted. Memory also has the bells and whistles mentioned on a previous page. Those with integrated graphics can also be adjusted.

What Alder Lake brings back to the table is BCLK overclocking. For the last decade or so, most overclocking is done with the CPU multiplier, and before that it was BCLK or FSB. Intel is now saying that BCLK overclocking has returned, and this is partly due to motherboard customizations in the clock generator. Every Alder Lake CPU has an internal BCLK/clock generator it can use, however motherboard vendors can also apply an external clock generator. Intel expects only the lowest-end motherboards will not have an external generator.

The use of two generators allows the user to overclock the PCIe bus using the external generator, while maintaining a regular BCLK on other parts of the system with the internal clock. The system can also apply voltage in an adaptive way based on the overclock, with additional PLL overrides.

On top of this, Intel is integrating more user-accessible telemetry for its cores, particularly the E-cores, and real-time frequency analysis. On top of this, users can adjust the memory frequency in the operating system, rather than having to reboot – this is an extension of the memory turbo functionality previously mentioned.

For regular users, Intel is also offering a one-click immediate overclock feature. On launch, the Core i9 will be supported and overclock the P-cores +100 MHz and the E-cores +300 MHz immediately. It sounds like Intel is confident that all CPUs will be able to do this, but they want it to be user selectable. Beyond that, I confirmed the tool does still void the warranty. Intel’s VP dismissed it as an issue, citing that the recent overclocker warranty program they canned had such a low pickup, it wasn’t worth continuing. I’d say that the two things are mutually exclusive, but that’s up to Intel.

DDR5: Detailed Support, XMP, Memory Boost Performance and Conclusions
Comments Locked

395 Comments

View All Comments

  • Qasar - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    nope. just no point argueing with someone that is a blind intel shill who wont look at individual tests to see that they are wrong. and that those reviews showed and stayed intel lost the gaming crown with zen 3.
  • Spunjji - Friday, October 29, 2021 - link

    I'll never understand the point of lying this far into a comments section
  • Qasar - Friday, October 29, 2021 - link

    simple, intel fanboy maybe ?
  • Flying Aardvark - Saturday, October 30, 2021 - link

    It's you AMD fanboys that lie. I'm the one revealing them. Just be happy with your hardware, no one cares if have a 2nd place gaming CPU. The gap has definitely closed so at least it's no longer humiliating to run AMD, but they are still buggier and less friendly with memory than Intel to this day. I know, I have a 5900X rig alongside an 11900K. I'll take the i9 every single day over the Ryzen. It's just a better overall machine.
  • Qasar - Sunday, October 31, 2021 - link

    no, you are just blind the the truth, and you have the 2nd place gaming cpu, individual reviews show this, look them up, like AT bench for example. i agree, it is no longer humiliating for amd, its now humiliating for intel :-)
    " but they are still buggier and less friendly with memory than Intel to this day. I know, I have a 5900X rig alongside an 11900K. " must be just you then, i have been using a 3900x for about 1.5 years now, issue free the whole time, and just picked up a 5900x, and so far, was a drop in replacement, and still no issues. " I'll take the i9 every single day over the Ryzen. It's just a better overall machine." that sucks power from the wall :-)
  • Flying Aardvark - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    Best AAA gaming chip = humiliation. You're worried about power consumption for the few hours you'll be gaming.. really grasping for straws just like every other fanboy.
  • Qasar - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    just like you your self are doing
  • Flying Aardvark - Monday, November 1, 2021 - link

    Nope, I just told you and every other delusional fool the truth. And I'll have the 12900K soon too, enjoy your potato.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    'It got to a point where Intel’s power consumption under turbo became a bit of a meme, and enthusiasts got annoyed that Intel buried this information away.'

    Intel's use of TDP was worse than buried information. It was deceptive. Glad to see it has belatedly been axed.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, October 28, 2021 - link

    I strikes me as ridiculous that people are being told that it's a good thing for a large amount of adequate hardware to be orphaned, via Windows 11's very aggressive Apple-like support policy — just so Alder Lake can be supported better.

    Is that the responsibility of consumers? To prop up Intel's latest design by being forced off a lot of useful hardware? It seems to me that if Intel wants Windows to cater to its CPUs it's its responsibility to get that, rather than dumping the problem onto consumers' wallets.

    Windows 10 is not going to have security patches after a few years. So, please don't try to excuse this with the argument that people can simply stay on 10. They can't. The Internet is at the heart of computing now. It is no longer 1984.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now