Battery Life

On the Surface Laptop 3, the battery life disparity between the AMD Picasso and the Intel Ice Lake was a big enough factor on its own to make it difficult to recommend the AMD-powered Surface Laptop 3 over the Intel version. However, for this generation the tables have turned. Microsoft’s recommendation when choosing AMD versus Intel, is choose the Intel for single-threaded performance, but choose the AMD not only for multi-threaded performance, but for battery life as well. While the gulf between Tiger Lake and Renoir is not as dramatic as it was between Picasso and Ice Lake, that is still a very interesting change in marketing.

Microsoft has said that they worked very closely with AMD on increasing battery life on the Surface Laptop 4, and these improvements will only benefit all AMD buyers for any device, which is why it was such good news to see AMD get a design win in the Surface Laptop 3 in the first place. With the Surface Laptop 4, those improvements to the APU design, coupled with tweaks to the operating system, have really paid dividends.

Battery Life – Web

Battery Life 2016 - Web

The battery life provided by the Surface Laptop 4 is really quite incredible when you factor in that this is a 15-inch notebook, and the display is always the source of most of the battery drain, and when you consider that Microsoft is only including a 46 Wh battery, which is very small for a 15-inch device. At over 11.5 hours, the Surface Laptop 4 offers very solid battery life in our web test, which is quite demanding.

Battery Life 2016 - Web - Normalized

Looking at the normalized results with the battery size removed from the equation, and it shows just how efficient the Surface Laptop 4 is. Despite having a larger display than the Dell XPS 13, it almost equals that device in terms of power draw. It is very impressive.

PCMark 10

PCMark 10 Modern Office Battery

UL’s PCMark 10 suite added a battery life test as well, and it works by looping some of the workloads from their performance tests in ten minute loops, but it takes into account performance as well by having a fixed workload per ten minutes, so if a device gets the task done quicker, it will have a larger percentage of the ten minutes that it can idle. The results are still excellent, with the Surface Laptop 4 offering one of the best results we have seen so far.

Movie Playback

Battery Life Movie Playback

Media playback is often one of the least demanding tasks on a modern processor, because all of the video decode functionality is handled by very power efficient fixed function hardware in the media engine, and as such, generally results in the longest runtimes of any test. Here, the Surface Laptop 4 delivers a very solid result, although the Tiger Lake MSI, and the Surface Book 3 with its massive battery, are both able to beat it in terms of overall runtime.

Battery Life Tesseract

To get a feel for what these results mean, our Tesseract score divides the movie playback runtime by the length of The Avengers. You could watch The Avengers six times in a row, which is likely enough times for anyone but the biggest fan of the movie.

Charge Time

Microsoft ships the Surface Laptop 4 with a 65-Watt power adapter, which magnetically attaches to the right side of the device on the Surface Connect port. Microsoft continues to provide a 5-Watt USB Type-A port on the power adapter itself, which works great to charge an ancillary device such as a phone from the same charger, and is a great feature. This leaves 60 Watts for the laptop from the power adapter.

There is also a USB Type-C port on the left side which will allow you to charge from a USB Type-C cable if needed.

Battery Charge Time

Charge time is about average, despite the small battery and fairly large charger. The previous generation completed this task a bit quicker when it was tested. The first 50% only took 41 minutes to complete.

Display Analysis Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • LarsBars - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Any word on why the AMD version is not offered with 32GB? Kind of hampering the 8c/16t with that ram configuration...
  • WaltC - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    So apparently the uptake here is: if you buy your Surface to play games, get the Intel-nVidia combo; but if you buy your surface for computational performance you buy the AMD versions...
  • SNESChalmers - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    What Intel/Nvidia combo? SL4 is Tigerlake/Xe or Renoir/Vega
  • Alistair - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    he was referring to the massively overprice Surface book, not "4"
  • Smell This - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link


    Only if you are, apparently, using the Xe with *96 Execution Units*
    Nothing about the i5-1145G7 and *80 Execution Units,* and the i7-1065G7 with 64 EUs kinda gets thumped ...
  • iphonebestgamephone - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Ok?
  • Smell This - Friday, May 7, 2021 - link


    I've got a stalker ... LOL
  • iphonebestgamephone - Friday, May 14, 2021 - link

    Then do something about it. Read my comment to your other comment.
  • brucethemoose - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    A tiny criticism: the hardware encoding test is apples to oranges, as all 3 encoders have different speed presets. Even at the same bitrate, the AMD encoder may be spitting out worse looking video at its default settings, or it may be better.

    Not that I mind the test. In fact, thats a huge buying factor for me. But (unless you want to dive into VMAF measurements), maybe add a little disclaimer?
  • eastcoast_pete - Thursday, May 6, 2021 - link

    Agree, and made a similar comment regarding the hardware-assisted video encoding. For this, NVIDIA's NVENC (since Turing) is still the best; AFAIK, neither Intel not AMD have updated their encoding ASIC and/or are still behind on quality. One reason why I am reluctant to get an AMD dGPU (assuming they are even in stock).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now