Conclusion & First Impressions

Today’s piece was less of a review on the new Mac mini as it was testing out Apple’s new M1 chip. We’ve had very little time with the device but hopefully were able to manage to showcase the key aspects of the new chip, and boy, it’s impressive.

For years now we’ve seen Apple’s custom CPU microarchitecture in A-series phone SoCs post impressive and repeated performance jumps generation after generation, and it today’s new Apple Silicon devices are essentially the culmination of the inevitable trajectory that Apple has been on.

In terms of power, the Apple M1 inside of the new Mac mini fills up a thermal budget up to around 20-24W from the SoC side. This is still clearly a low-power design, and Apple takes advantage of that to implement it into machines such as the now fan-less Macbook Air. We haven’t had opportunity to test that device yet, but we expect the same peak performance, although with more heavy throttling once the SoC saturates the heat dissipation of that design.

In the new Macbook Pro, we expect the M1 to showcase similar, if not identical performance to what we’ve seen on the new Mac mini. Frankly, I suspect Apple could have down-sized the Mini, although we don’t exactly now the internal layout of the piece as we weren’t allowed to disassemble it.

The performance of the new M1 in this “maximum performance” design with a small fan is outstandingly good. The M1 undisputedly outperforms the core performance of everything Intel has to offer, and battles it with AMD’s new Zen3, winning some, losing some. And in the mobile space in particular, there doesn’t seem to be an equivalent in either ST or MT performance – at least within the same power budgets.

What’s really important for the general public and Apple’s success is the fact that the performance of the M1 doesn’t feel any different than if  you were using a very high-end Intel or AMD CPU. Apple achieving this in-house with their own design is a paradigm shift, and in the future will allow them to achieve a certain level of software-hardware vertical integration that just hasn’t been seen before and isn’t achieved yet by anybody else.

The software side of things already look good on day 1 due to Apple’s Rosetta2. Whilst the software doesn’t offer the best the hardware can offer, with time, as developers migrate their applications to native Apple Silicon support, the ecosystem will flourish. And in the meantime, the M1 is fast enough that it can absorb the performance hit from Rosetta2 and still deliver solid performance for all but the most CPU-critical x86 applications.

For developers, the Apple Silicon Macs also represent the very first full-fledged Arm machines on the market that have few-to-no compromises. This is a massive boost not just for Apple, but for the larger Arm ecosystem and the growing Arm cloud-computing business.

Overall, Apple hit it out of the park with the M1.

Rosetta2: x86-64 Translation Performance
Comments Locked

682 Comments

View All Comments

  • Tams80 - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    Or not believing the ridiculous claims that phenonemal leaps in computing power can be made with no equal leaps in technology.
  • tempestglen - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    LOL
  • patel21 - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    yes AMD wins, even though it uses 5x more power to do that. So live in your cocoon
  • BlackHat - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    With 25 power consumption I think that a zen 3 Cézanne can match that with a very close power consumption.
  • Hifihedgehog - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    Apple shills. There is a reason certain investors and others are poo pooing this and have even pulled out because the writing is on the wall. Apple is going to double down on the walled garden to get that juicy 30% and developers who cater to open development environments, ones outside of the paid ad spots that we saw in the presentation, will not stand for it. Plain and simple.
  • Dolda2000 - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    What you say may very well be true, but is a completely different question from the technical examination of Apple's microarchitecture.
  • Spunjji - Thursday, November 19, 2020 - link

    The goalposts have to be moved *somewhere*, why not there? :D
  • xenol - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    Why don't you make your own "professional quality" review?

    Oh right.
  • WinterCharm - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    Fanboys are going to fanboy. The first stage of grief is denial. Anandtech's review integrity is above question here.
  • melgross - Tuesday, November 17, 2020 - link

    The problem here is your mental state, not the state of the review, which as always, is studded with facts and knowledgeable conclusions.

    Sorry that your world has burst, but it will happen again and again. Get used to it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now