Xe-LP GPU Performance: F1 2019

The F1 racing games from Codemasters have been popular benchmarks in the tech community, mostly for ease-of-use and that they seem to take advantage of any area of a machine that might be better than another. The 2019 edition of the game features all 21 circuits on the calendar, and includes a range of retro models and DLC focusing on the careers of Alain Prost and Ayrton Senna. Built on the EGO Engine 3.0, the game has been criticized similarly to most annual sports games, by not offering enough season-to-season graphical fidelity updates to make investing in the latest title worth it, however the 2019 edition revamps up the Career mode, with features such as in-season driver swaps coming into the mix. The quality of the graphics this time around is also superb, even at 4K low or 1080p Ultra.

To be honest, F1 benchmarking has been up and down in any given year. Since at least 2014, the benchmark has revolved around a ‘test file’, which allows you to set what track you want, which driver to control, what weather you want, and which cars are in the field. In previous years I’ve always enjoyed putting the benchmark in the wet at Spa-Francorchamps, starting the fastest car at the back with a field of 19 Vitantonio Liuzzis on a 2-lap race and watching sparks fly. In some years, the test file hasn’t worked properly, with the track not being able to be changed.

For our test, we put Alex Albon in the Red Bull in position #20, for a dry two-lap race around Austin.

F1 2019: 768p Ultra Low QualityF1 2019: 1080p Ultra Quality

In this case, at 1080p Ultra, AMD and Intel (28W) are matched. Unfortunately looking through the data, the 15 W test run crashed and we only noticed after we returned the system.

Xe-LP GPU Performance: World of Tanks Conclusion: Is Intel Smothering AMD in Sardine Oil?
Comments Locked

253 Comments

View All Comments

  • SplinesNS - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    The Sardine oil and Tiger King references make it hard for an international reader to actually make sense of content here. I am not sure who the target audience is for this website but I would kindly request you not to use very culture specific references on a technology website.
  • Bik - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    It is subjective, but I think it fun and I'm an international reader. Without these references the article would be too dry. I think one can still get 100% technical detail and not knowing the puns.
  • Spunjji - Saturday, September 19, 2020 - link

    Seconded.
  • Samus - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    This is criminal. They are going to sell a CPU of the same model and allow OEM's to have it perform vastly different without disclosing the actual performance? What's next, bring back the PR rating?
  • Spunjji - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    To be fair, this isn't new. Intel CPUs have differed significantly in performance depending on cooling implementation on the final product for a while, and AMD have similar issues now.
  • Oxford Guy - Sunday, September 20, 2020 - link

    How new this is is less important than the fact that it's a scam.
  • Spunjji - Sunday, September 20, 2020 - link

    It's relevant when someone's talking about it like it's a new problem..?
  • maroon1 - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Clock for clock comparison is useless

    The fact that Tiger Lake beats Ice Lake at same power means than Tiger Lake is superior out of the two. Period

    Also iGPU performance boost is huge. It beats 65w APU in some cases. But there is some inconsistency because some cases it does not beat 15w APU. It might be because of drivers ??!
  • yeeeeman - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Damn, willow cove is actually lower ipc vs sunny??? Wow, that was unexpected! Intel needs to improve the ipc of the next gen core massively if they want to stay on top. I know the rumours say 50% better than skylake but even that, if it will happen will not be sufficient.
  • m53 - Friday, September 18, 2020 - link

    Willow cove has ~20% better IPC than Zen2. Golden Cove is rumored to add another 25% taking the lead to ~45% by mid 2021. Will Zen3 be able to close the 45% IPC deficit? AMD says no. By their own best case projection they expect 15% IPC. That would pul Zen3 at a 30% IPC deficit vs Golden Cove. As you can see the IPC deficit keeps widening.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now