Conclusion

I've rolled my eyes every time SK hynix uses their "4D NAND" moniker to describe their combination of a peripheral under cell layout and charge trap flash. It seemed like a silly exaggeration of a minor advance over other 3D NAND, especially since Intel and Micron have been doing "CMOS under the Array" since their first generation of 3D NAND. But now that I've tested a SSD using this "4D NAND" for the first time, I'll admit it's not purely marketing fluff. This is a genuinely impressive product, and the new 3D NAND seems to be a very important factor. In some very important ways, SK hynix has taken the technological lead, even if this position may not last long.

The SK hynix Gold P31 at first glance seems to be a fairly ordinary high-end NVMe drive, albeit still limited to PCIe 3.0 speeds. It offers well-rounded performance but sets few performance records for this market segment. The write endurance ratings are good and it hit the market with competitive pricing from day one. Taken together with last year's release of the decent Gold S31 SATA SSDs, this is enough to establish SK hynix as an important player in the retail consumer SSD market.

But that's not the whole story when it comes to the Gold P31. The drive's power efficiency is far above the competition; it uses less power than many SATA SSDs while delivering high-end NVMe performance. Thanks to good co-design of their 128L 3D NAND and their in-house NVMe SSD controller, SK hynix has completely redefined our standards for NVMe SSD power efficiency and turned in the most surprising benchmark results in my five years of working for AnandTech.

High-End NVMe SSD Price Comparison
August 26, 2020
  240-280GB 480-512GB 960GB-1TB 2TB
SK hynix Gold P31   $74.99
(15¢/GB)
$134.99
(13¢/GB)
 
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro $44.99
(18¢/GB)
$69.99
(14¢/GB)
$134.99
(13¢/GB)
$249.99
(12¢/GB)
Inland Premium $43.99
(17¢/GB)
$64.99
(13¢/GB)
$119.99
(12¢/GB)
$234.99
(11¢/GB)
Team MP34 $44.99
(18¢/GB)
$66.99
(13¢/GB)
$122.99
(12¢/GB)
 
Crucial P5 $54.95
(22¢/GB)
$79.95
(16¢/GB)
$149.95
(15¢/GB)
$339.95
(17¢/GB)
WD Black SN750 $54.99
(22¢/GB)
$69.99
(14¢/GB)
$134.99
(13¢/GB)
$329.99
(16¢/GB)
Samsung 970 EVO Plus $69.99
(28¢/GB)
$99.99
(20¢/GB)
$189.99
(19¢/GB)
$369.99
(18¢/GB)
Corsair Force MP600   $109.99
(22¢/GB)
$194.99
(19¢/GB)
$379.99
(19¢/GB)

Surprises like this are why I wish more SSD vendors would sample their OEM drives for review. The P31 is far from SK hynix's first NVMe SSD. It's just the first consumer NVMe SSD they're selling directly as a retail product. They have been manufacturing client NVMe SSDs for years for PC OEMs, but those never find their way onto our SSD testbed.

Some of the first M.2 PCIe SSDs (Samsung XP941 and SM951) were OEM-only products, shipping well before the launch of the retail 950 PRO. We've now seen about six iterations of Samsung's M.2 PCIe SSDs go across our testbeds (in part thanks to help from third-party suppliers who provided some of those OEM-only models for us to review), and because of that we can chart the evolution of their storage technology. But this SK hynix drive comes more or less out of the blue.

Western Digital's first in-house NVMe controllers were announced alongside a pair of OEM drives. The high-end one (SN720) was followed up by a retail counterpart (WD Black gen2) a few months later. I asked Western Digital for a sample of the entry-level OEM SN520 when they introduced that second-generation WD Black, but they couldn't sample it to me. Much later, the retail SN500 arrived and raised the bar for DRAMless SSD performance. More recently, Micron's 2200 series client SSD with their in-house NVMe controller was announced over a year before the Crucial P5 arrived.

Toshiba (now Kioxia) has been the exception; in the past few years they have sampled the XG5, XG6 and BG4 to show off new SSD tech before it makes it into retail drives. OEM SSD products are often managed by separate departments that don't have any PR budget beyond one or two press releases a year. These drives don't need aggressive marketing, but without any review sampling whatsoever we're clearly missing important parts of the  picture of the overall SSD market. It's also nice when we can confirm that the drives being used by eg. Dell aren't crap badly in need of an aftermarket replacement.

Even though a close look at recent OEM NVMe SSDs from SK hynix may have tempered the surprise of the Gold P31, it's still an impressive product. It shoots right to the top of my list of recommended SSDs for laptops and finally erases the lingering power efficiency advantage of SATA SSDs, and as a result of that we're giving it one of our coveted Recommended By AnandTech awards.


SK hynix Gold P31: The New Standard for NVMe Laptop SSDs

 

The SK hynix Gold P31 provides a preview of what how the entry-level NVMe SSD market segment will advance over the next few years, especially as the high-end moves on to PCIe gen4. The Gold P31 still retains plenty of performance for almost all consumer use cases, and will be excellently comfortable sitting in a laptop.

Power Management
Comments Locked

80 Comments

View All Comments

  • vladx - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    I have a SX8200 Pro on my laptop, do I need to enable the laptop Power Management state or is it detected automatically by the firmware?
  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    That really depends on what combination of firmware and driver bugs the laptop vendor gave you. But in theory, if the machine originally came with a M.2 NVMe drive, it should have been configured for proper power management and should continue to work well with an aftermarket SSD that doesn't bring any new power management bugs. I think the SX8200 Pro is okay on that score; the slow wake-up times shouldn't prevent the system from trying to use the deep idle states because the drive still promises the OS that it will have reasonable wake-up times.
  • vladx - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    My laptop is a MSI Creator 17 that came with a Samsung PM981 drive. Could HWinfo offer any help in identifying the active power states?
  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    I'm not sure. I think you can figure out what PCIe power management settings are being used by digging through the PCI configuration space, but I'm not sure how easy it is to get that info while running Windows. As for the NVMe power management settings, my understanding is that it's impossible or very nearly impossible to access that information under Windows, at least with the usual NVMe drivers. The only reliable way I know of to confirm that everything is working correctly to get your SSD idling below 10mW is to have expensive power measurement equipment.
  • vladx - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    Ok thanks, Billy. I was going to install Fedora anyways as secondary OS so I guess I'll try the Linux route then.
  • MrCommunistGen - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    vladx, I'm really interested in how you go about trying to tease the NVMe power management info out of the drive. I did some internet searches a while back and didn't find anything definitive that I was able to follow and get results from. I've only ever used Debian-based distros, but if you're able to figure it out in Fedora then at least I'll know it is possible.
  • Foeketijn - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    Did it happen? Did Samsung finally get an actual competitor? It doesn't really beat the 970 evo that much, so the 970 pro would still be better, but not at this price point, and definitely not with this power usage.
    Last time intel did that, Samsung suddenly woke up and beat them down again to a place where they stayed since.
    Interesting to see what the new evo and pro line will bring.
    Not high margin prices this time arround I guess.
  • LarsBolender - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    This has to be one of the most positive AnandTech articles I have read in years. Good job SK Hynix!
  • Luminar - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    No recommendation sticker, though.
  • Zan Lynx - Thursday, August 27, 2020 - link

    It would be handy if you could add a power loss consistency test. I have a Dell with an older hynix NVMe and one time the battery ran down in the bag, and on reboot its btrfs was corrupt.

    Imagine these are sequence numbers in metadata blocks.
    Correct: 10 12 22 30
    Actual: 10 12 11 30

    The hynix had committed writes for SOME of the blocks but a few in the middle of the update chain were old versions of the data. According to btrfs flush rules that is un-possible. Which means that the drive reported a successful write for 22 and for 30 but after powerloss recovery it lost that write for 22 and reverted to an older block.

    I mean, that's better than some of the older flash drives that would trash the entire FTL and lose all the data. But it is not exactly GOOD.

    I'm pretty sure Samsung consumer drives will also lose the data but at least they will revert all of the writes following the lost data, so in my example it would revert write 30 also. That would at least leave things in a logically consistent state.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now