System Performance

When we reviewed the XPS 13 2-in-1 back in November, it was the first device we had tested which featured the new 10 nm Intel Ice Lake platform. At that time, Dell had also recently refreshed the XPS 13, but had outfitted it with the older 14 nm Comet Lake platform. For the all-new XPS 13, Dell has now brought parity to their lineup with Ice Lake here as well, with the improvements that platform brings, especially to the graphics side.

Dell offers three processor options. The least-expensive offering is the Core i3-1005G1, the mid-tier outfitted with the Core i5-1035G1, and the top-tier offering the Core i7-1065G7. Our review unit features the Core i7 model, as Dell wanted to put its best foot forward.

On the memory side, Dell’s spec sheet shows a 4 GB base, although thankfully that is nowhere to be found on their Dell.com site, at least for the USA. Thanks to the move to LPDDR4X with Ice Lake, Dell now offers up to 32 GB of memory on the XPS 13. Storage is all PCIe x4 NVMe, with 256 GB as the base, and a 2 TB maximum.

To see how the XPS 13 performs, we have run it through our newly updated laptop suite. Please not that if a graph does not contain a specific older device, that means that the test has not been run on it. Since the laptops are returned to the manufacturer after review, we cannot do any regression testing for the most part. If you’d like to compare the XPS 13 to any other laptop we have tested, please refer to our Online Bench.

PCMark

PCMark 10 - Essentials

PCMark 10 - Productivity

PCMark 10 - Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 - Overall

UL’s PCMark 10 is a whole-system benchmark, testing everything from CPU performance to app loading time. The Overall score consists of three categories, each featuring their own unique sub-tests. Overall the XPS 13 scored right in the same ballpark as other Ice Lake notebooks, although was slightly down in the Productivity tests, but slightly ahead in the other two.

Cinebench

Cinebench R20 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R20 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench, based on Maxon’s Cinema 4D rendering, allows tests of both single-threaded and multi-threaded runs, making it one of the more popular tests for overall computational performance. The XPS 13 does well compared to other Ice Lake equipped notebooks, although with AMD offering up to 8 cores in the same 15-Watt TDP, Intel falls behind in the multi-threaded run.

Handbrake

Handbrake Transcoding (Software)

Handbrake Transcoding (Hardware)

In our Handbrake encoding test, we transcode a 1080p movie to 720p using both software and hardware encoders. Software encoders utilize the CPU, and are generally the preferred method for optimal quality, whereas hardware encoders leverage the media blocks, which in this case is Intel’s QuickSync, for a much faster encode. As we will see more in the thermals section, Dell limits the XPS 13 to a 15-Watt TDP even in its maximum performance mode, where some other manufacturers will allow for higher than listed TDP, up to 20 Watts or so, and as such, the XPS 13 falls a bit behind other Ice Lake notebooks in this test which is TDP limited.

7-Zip

7-Zip Compression

7-Zip Decompression

The popular file compression and decompression tool 7-Zip includes a built-in benchmark, and once again the XPS 13 slots right into where other Ice Lake notebooks fit.

Web Tests

Web performance is a function of not only the CPU performance, but also the browser’s scripting engine, and as such we have standardized on the Microsoft Edge browser. Microsoft has now transitioned their browser to the open-source Chromium project. Due to this, we have reset our web tests to use the new Chromium based Edge and taken the opportunity to decommission some of the older tests. We will now focus on Speedometer 2.0 and WebXPRT 3.

Speedometer 2.0

WebXPRT 3

The XPS 13 again slots right in where you would expect for an i7-1065G7 based system.

Storage Performance

Dell offers from 256 GB to 2 TB of PCIe storage, and the review unit was outfitted with the Intel 600p 512 GB drive. We are transitioning to the PCMark 10 storage benchmark, which uses test traces of actual common workloads, such as booting Windows, and many of the Adobe applications, and as such should be a much better indicator of drive performance than just maximum transfer rates.

PCMark 10 System Drive Benchmark Bandwidth

PCMark 10 System Drive Benchmark Average Access Time

PCMark 10 System Drive Benchmark Score

The Intel 600p performs quite well, with good access times and solid bandwidth. Surprisingly, it can’t quite match the excellent performance we saw from the SK Hynix 2230 form factor SSD in the Surface Laptop 3, but almost matches it.

Design GPU Performance
Comments Locked

224 Comments

View All Comments

  • sonny73n - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    Haha... Dell XPS i7 $1400 gets beat up by Acer 4700U $650. Lovely!
    Based on some comments here, Intel fanboys are a bunch of sore losers.
  • Walkeer - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    a king...with intel...in 2020 XD
  • ikjadoon - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    I really hope manufacturers copy Dell's strong improvements here: no silly keyboard gimmicks or bloatware (looking at you, *****ing HP), improve the screen contrast, glare, and ratio (you gotta stare it all day), and nail battery life. With a near 16-hour real-world battery life, it absolutely dissuades ARM transitions purely for efficiency.

    But, while I love Dell's improvements, a few hard-to-swallow regressions here:

    -- no type-A port. That's just frustrating. Are we *really* in a type-C-only world? No. And Dell knows that. Why is a "productivity" device (16:10 panel) handicapped? Did we need it thinner? Where the hell are all the PCH's USB / PCIe bandwidth going? Into the ... charge port? We should have 4X type-C ports these days.
    -- soldered SSD. An absolutely groundless regression. Goodbye to a last-chance backup if the motherboard dies. And don't even think about out-of-warranty replacements.
    -- toasty, toasty, toasty bottoms. 42 W PL2, even with GORE, is absolutely "crazy", as Anandtech points out. Likewise, Notebookcheck notched a nearly 30C idle bottom panel in a 20C room: the heat just exudes out even at idle. Add in a heavy load and you're at a toasty 46C in the back bottom (https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-XPS-13-9300-Cor...

    And, it should be noted: Dell still sells the older Comet Lake-U models, so buyer beware which "XPS 13" you click on. The product names are identical and both use "10th gen" CPUs.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    High heat, lack of useful ports and soldered storage make this a worthless device.
  • sonny73n - Saturday, July 18, 2020 - link

    Buyers don’t have to beware. Just use it for a couple weeks then return. I went to dell website to check the price and specs of the model AT reviews. They have everything messy. No filter and no year of release for all the laptops they’re selling. Only “for home” and “for work”. wtf? I can’t buy a “work” laptop just to watch youtube at home? How about a laptop for both home and work?
    I used to prefer dell products especially monitors but since they became intel’s lap dog to monopolize the market, I put them on my “do not buy” list. Overpriced dells are for idiots.
  • stanleyipkiss - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    It WOULD be a solid laptop (the perfect ultrabook even) -- if they had included at least ONE USB A port.
  • sonny73n - Friday, July 17, 2020 - link

    NOT when it costs $1400.
  • Sharma_Ji - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    Qualcomm based atheros wireless modules were so good, I don't believe how killer ones are so bad, that intel acquired killer, sad that Qualcomm based modules will no longer will be available.
  • invinciblegod - Thursday, July 16, 2020 - link

    I don't know, are Qualcomm's wireless modules that good for Windows? I've had many problems in enterprises where Qualcomm's wifi was always unstable compared to Intel's. Though admittedly, at home I never had a problem.
  • shadowjk - Sunday, July 19, 2020 - link

    Qualcomm based Killer WiFi is borderline unusable. If you can get the hardware running on the regular drivers from Qualcomm it gets tolerable.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now