*We are currently in the middle of revisiting our CPU gaming benchmarks, but the new suite was not ready in time for this review. We plan to add in some new games (Borderland 3, Gears Tactics) and also upgrade our gaming GPU to an RTX 2080 Ti.

Gaming: World of Tanks enCore

Albeit different to most of the other commonly played MMO or massively multiplayer online games, World of Tanks is set in the mid-20th century and allows players to take control of a range of military based armored vehicles. World of Tanks (WoT) is developed and published by Wargaming who are based in Belarus, with the game’s soundtrack being primarily composed by Belarusian composer Sergey Khmelevsky. The game offers multiple entry points including a free-to-play element as well as allowing players to pay a fee to open up more features. One of the most interesting things about this tank based MMO is that it achieved eSports status when it debuted at the World Cyber Games back in 2012.

World of Tanks enCore is a demo application for a new and unreleased graphics engine penned by the Wargaming development team. Over time the new core engine will implemented into the full game upgrading the games visuals with key elements such as improved water, flora, shadows, lighting as well as other objects such as buildings. The World of Tanks enCore demo app not only offers up insight into the impending game engine changes, but allows users to check system performance to see if the new engine run optimally on their system.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

AnandTech IGP Low Medium High
Average FPS
95th Percentile

 

CPU Performance: Web and Legacy Tests Gaming: Final Fantasy XV
Comments Locked

249 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ian Cutress - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    4790K 6700K 7700K
    All Intel quad core showing generational differences as to where the 3300X and 3100 fit in.

    1600X, 1700, 1700X, 1800X are all in our benchmark database, Bench.
    It's practically listed on almost every page.
  • notb - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    And that's obviously great. But with that approach you could just write "3100 and 3300X added to Bench", right? :)

    I have nothing against the factual layer of this article. Results are as expected and they look consistent.
    But it's essentially a story how an entry-level $120 CPU from company A beats a not-so-ancient flagship from company B.

    So I'm merely wondering why you decided to write it like this, instead of comparing to wider choice of expensive CPUs from 2017. Because in many of your results 3300X beats 1st gen Ryzens that were even more expensive than the 7700K.
    Or you could include older 4C/8T Ryzens (1500X) - showing how much faster Zen2 is.

    Instead you've included the older 6-core Ryzens, which are neither similar in core count nor in MSRP.
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    2600/1600 AF is ~$85 at retail (where you can find it), and judging by the comments, VERY popular. That's why this was included.
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    Just say AMD GOOD! INTEL BAD! that's all they are looking for
  • eastcoast_pete - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Some other sites have, and yes, the 3300 gives most of the 1st generation Ryzens a run for their money.
  • Irata - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    This is a highly impressive little CPU for the money.

    I particularly liked the 3300X‘s good showing. If this is at least in part due to it using only one CCX, this should bode well for Ryzen 3 which should have an eight core CCX.

    Look at some tests were Ryzen did not do so well wrt their Intel counterpart like Kraken and Octane - the 3300x now does very well. It even scores slightly better than the 3700x
  • wr3zzz - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Does the B550 MB need active cooling? I can't tell from the pic.
  • callmebob - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Look at the spec graphics. Note the only difference to the old B450 is pretty much that it provides PCIe 3.0 lanes instead of PCIe 2.0.

    Now, when was the last time you saw a PCIe 3.0-based chipset hub needing active cooling?

    As an aside, while i am kinda glad the B550 is finally coming, i am also a bit disappointed in seeing AMD (and their design/manufacturing partners) needing a better part of a year just for managing a bump from PCIe 2.0 to PCIe 3.0. PCIe 3.0 has been in the market for around eight years now; there is no excuse for AMD taking this long to figure out this s*it.
  • Fritzkier - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Because their PCIe 3 and 4 was provided by the CPU tho. Or maybe there's an advantage of PCIe lanes provided by the chipset?
  • callmebob - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    Haha, do you even know _how many_ PCIe lanes the CPU provides? Wager a guess whether it is for more than a single x16 slot?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now