Display Analysis

Acer offers just a single display option on the 14-inch AMD based Swift 3, which is a 1920x1080 IPS display. Considering the price, this is the right option, although it is interesting that they are offering a 13.5-inch 3:2 Intel based Swift 3 in the SF313-52. The 3:2 works quite well for productivity, although less-so for gaming where 16:9 generally suffers from fewer issues.

There is no touch capability with this display, which is a bit of a shame, but also understandable with the other features offered. Acer did well to hit their target price range, and they made overall good decisions on where to invest. Touch is a nice to have, but not a necessity, although when you are used to having it, it is amazing how often you try to touch the screen.

To see how the display stacks up, the laptop was tested with Portrait Display’s CalMAN software suite. For brightness and contrast, the X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter was used, and for color accuracy readings the X-Rite i1Pro 2 spectrophotometer was employed.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The Acer Swift 3 does not get off to a great start. In a budget notebook, displays tend to be one of the first things on the chopping block. Luckily, we’ve moved past the era where these types of notebooks would offer 1366x768 TN panels, but Acer’s 1920x1080 IPS choice doesn’t offer very good black levels, and their backlight is somewhat weak. It is an inauspicious start.

Grayscale

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Grayscale measures the laptops ability to display white levels, from 0% (black) to 100% (white), and the Swift 3 performs quite poorly here. The blue levels are far too strong across most of the range. Gamma is also way off of the expected 2.2 level.

Gamut

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - Gamut Accuracy

Windows 10 is still an sRGB system first and foremost, so proper sRGB gamut support is required for proper color accuracy. The Acer Swift 3 unfortunately does not cover anywhere near the sRGB gamut, which means that the LED backlighting was likely another area where some money was saved. Although grayscale can be salvaged with some ICC profiles, without full sRGB backlighting this laptop would likely suffer further if an ICC was applied because it simply cannot cover the entire sRGB spectrum.

Saturation

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The saturation test covers the primary and secondary colors, but unlike the gamut where they are just measured at 100% level, we test them on 4-bit steps from 0% to 100%. Since we’ve already determined the laptop can’t hit the full sRGB gamut, it is no surprise to see the saturation sweeps suffer.

Gretag Macbeth

Portrait Display CalMAN

Display - GMB Accuracy

The Gretag Macbeth tests colors off of the primary and secondary axis, including the important skin tones, but with a display that can’t reproduce the entire sRGB range, the Acer Swift 3 naturally performs quite poorly on this test.

Colorchecker

Portrait Display CalMAN

Finally, we have the colorchecker, where you can more easily visualize the color errors with this display. This is a relative test, since any errors in your own display will influence the result, but on the bottom of the swatches is the color requested, and the top shows the color produced by the display. It is not pretty.

Display Conclusion

Overall, despite the poor showing here, the display is in-line with expectations at this price point. Over the last couple of years, there has been a push for better displays, and laptop makers have made the jump to 1920x1080 IPS panels pretty much across the board; so even though this display is poor compared to better IPS-based laptops, it still does offer the good viewing angles an IPS panel enjoys, and 1920x1080 works very well on a 14-inch screen size.

The very poor backlighting really does hamper the capabilities of this notebook. If you wanted to use it for editing photos or video, the internal components like the CPU, memory, and GPU, really would help, but the included display with its lack of sRGB coverage would certainly hinder the work. For basic office tasks, or even gaming, most people who are looking at a laptop at this price point will likely not be too concerned about the display, but just be aware that this one is deficient in several areas.

GPU Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

191 Comments

View All Comments

  • Spunjji - Wednesday, May 6, 2020 - link

    That's going to have been the same for his existing systems, though. Your numbers are off too - the amount used by the iGPU is flexible. Right now on my 8GB system with a pair of 1080p screens connected, it's losing 128MB to the iGPU.
  • Icehawk - Thursday, May 7, 2020 - link

    My enterprise loads so many agents a typical machine sits at 4-6gb at boot. 16gb is plenty for almost anyone though.
  • fmcjw - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    You're talking about this one, right? Looks like the same model bring reviewed here.
    https://item.jd.com/100006461093.html#crumb-wrap

    For the price of a Xiaomi Mi 10 you get 16GB RAM and 512GB SSD, almost too good to pass up. But for 300USD more the Swift 5 has Thunderbolt 3 (vs full-function USB-C alt), full-gamut AUO matte touch screen (vs plain IPS and if it's BOE panel probability is high it flickers), bigger battery (48Wh vs 56Wh), 8GB RAM onboard with an empty slot, and is 200 grams lighter... decisions decisions...
  • eek2121 - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    “ To see how the Acer Swift 3 with Ryzen 7 4700U performs, we have run it through our laptop test suite to see how it performs.”

    Grammar.
  • sorten - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    Whew, the news for Intel is as bad as we expected.
  • Deicidium369 - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    https://www.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/model/NX.HJF... Identical except for the APU
  • sorten - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    LOL ... The i7 got pounded into the dirt, and even the i5 is more expensive than the AMD powered version.
  • Korguz - Tuesday, May 5, 2020 - link

    sorten, Deicidium369 doesnt care, he bases his post on his own person anti amd opinions, not facts. he cant get his own personal facts straight, why would he get these facts correct ?
  • schujj07 - Wednesday, May 6, 2020 - link

    He was banned from Tomshardware forum. He posted mostly false information and had the attitude of a cyber bully.
  • Korguz - Wednesday, May 6, 2020 - link

    ive noticed, his post there, like here are pure fiction, and comedy gold, specially when others refute is BS, and he has no way to counter it, and just runs away, and doesnt reply back

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now