GPU Benchmarks

Graphics is going to be a bit more challenging than the CPU tests. Games that test both the CPU and the GPU to the limits are going to find different tradeoffs with each of these systems.

The ASUS Zephyrus G14 is smaller and more thermally limited. It doesn’t have an AMD GPU, so it can’t take advantage of AMD’s new features like SmartShift that can manage power between the CPU and GPU. It technically has the stronger CPU, and while the graphics card is the same, ASUS has the Max-Q version of the RTX 2060, which is optimized for power and efficiency, and exhibits lower clocks. Technically the base frequency of this configuration is higher, at 975 MHz, the turbo is lower at 1185 MHz, and the GDDR6 memory is a lot lower at 1375 MHz (11Gbps/pin).

The Razer Blade 15 has the bigger chassis, and we assume is built for a larger overall TDP. While it has the ‘weaker’ CPU of the two, with fewer cores and lower frequency, it is paired with a full-fat GTX 2060 graphics card. We looked at the data for this card, and it exhibits a lower 960 MHz base frequency, it has the higher 1200 MHz turbo, 1750 MHz memory, and has a direct PCIe 3.0 x16 connection with the processor, while the ASUS system is only an x8.

For our tests, I’ve taken an older test (CS:Source), a couple of modern tests (Civ 6, FFXV) and a new test in Borderlands 3. We used the following settings:

  • Final Fantasy, 1080p Fullscreen, Standard Quality
  • Borderlands 3, 1080p, Medium Pre-Set
  • Civilization 6, 1080p Maximum Preset No MSAA / 1K Occlusion Textures
  • Civilization 6, 1080p Maximum Preset 8x MSAA / 2K Occlusion Textures
  • Counter Strike Source, 1080p Maximum

Final Fantasy XV (1080p Standard)

In Final Fantasy, the results were around 10% different, favoring the AMD system.

Borderlands 3 (1080p Medium)

Borderlands 3 was actually fairly close, with less than 5% between them, but still favoring AMD. I did notice that we were fairly close to the cutoff here between being CPU limited and GPU limited.

Civilization 6 (1080p Max, No MSAA)

Civilization 6 is well known for constantly updating and being optimized, and here it seems the more powerful GPU wins out by a large 10 FPS margin.

Civilization 6 (1080p Max, 8x MSAA)

However, if we add in some more compute and detail, we move to a more GPU limited scenario where the results are essentially equal.

Counter Strike Source (1080p Max)

Counter Strike is an odd one, given how old the game is. Here the game favors the Intel machine, with a ~10% advantage.

Like in the CPU tests, I did some of these gaming tests with the power cord removed and on battery saver mode. Results were interesting, to say the least, and can be found on the next page.

ASUS Zephyrus G14 (Ryzen 9) vs Razer Blade (Core i7): CPU ASUS Zephyrus G14 (Ryzen 9) vs Razer Blade (Core i7): Low Power Performance
Comments Locked

267 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gondalf - Friday, April 10, 2020 - link

    I find crazy to compare an 8 core Laptop to a 6 core one.
    Intel is plenty of 45W 8 cores SKUs for laptops with turbos at over 5Ghz, and we are here to show nothing.
    So basically AMD can only compete with a 6 core Coffee lake???
  • Irata - Friday, April 10, 2020 - link

    There are reviews that show the eight core can‘t keep up either or just barely and that is in a huge and heavy chassis (i.e. the portable desktop type). And their battery life is even worse, as is their power consumption.

    Oh, and looking at this review, the six core is coupled with a faster RTX 2060 GPU...
  • Idontknowhatosay - Friday, April 10, 2020 - link

    Der8auer did a comparison against the 9980HK and the 4900HS still came on top in performance. It even manages to keep up with the 5 GHz, 90 watt core i9 inside the Helios 700, which is a beast of a laptop in terms of size and weight.
  • Omega215D - Friday, April 10, 2020 - link

    goddamn intel fanboys truly want to distort shit so there is no real competition left in this space.
  • Namisecond - Monday, April 13, 2020 - link

    There is no real consumer "competition" in this space. Intel's 10nm production is fubar'd for the time being, To the point where expected products are just now trickling into the market place. AMD could capitalize on this, but their production is constrained because they don't have full control of their own production. This is the mobile market, not the desktop CPU market where you can have retail sales. OEMs are key here.

    2020 will be a bad year for laptop options.
  • vozmem - Friday, April 10, 2020 - link

    Yes, you are right.
    It is crazy because the 6-core Razer laptop is also slightly more expensive than 8-core Asus laptop.
  • s.yu - Saturday, April 11, 2020 - link

    In all fairness, Razer is usually more expensive than Asus.
  • alufan - Friday, April 10, 2020 - link

    hmm ok so the Intel CPU was supposed to be at 45w but could not maintain that probably du e to thermals, its supposed to clock higher but ditto and the 2060 is a higher performance version, however other tests still show the Ryzen ahead on 8 core Intels as well, it also seems to be a common result that the AMD is a long long way ahead on its battery life, not sure about other countries but this week in the UK we have had every online seller doing ads on TV pushing Intel laptops to the max, no doubt paid for by Intels rebate scheme dirty tricks me thinks but the truth will out gen 10 indeed lol
  • Deicidium369 - Sunday, April 12, 2020 - link

    95% of the market vs 5% of the market - that's called playing to the largest potential audience. Sorry but Intel outsells AMD at every single price point - regardless of what the AMD fanboys say - Revenues do not lie.
  • Qasar - Sunday, April 12, 2020 - link

    well other sites say different about who out sells who, others here have even posted links that show this.
    "Revenues do not lie. " of course they dont, specially when you overcharge for your products

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now