AMD Ryzen 4000 Mobile APUs
Comments Locked

406 Comments

View All Comments

  • Cooe - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Rofl, this might be one of the most "pot meet kettle" comments I've ever seen. The hypocrisy here is so thick I can straight up smell it.
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link

    Pretty sure "LogitechFan" is a sockpuppet. The very idea of having a sock on the Anandtech comments is desperately sad, but then so are their posts, so...
  • Jugotta Bichokink - Tuesday, January 7, 2020 - link

    Intel is a company that relies on desperate fangirl socks, so yeah.

    Cinebench is just one metric. If it was the only metric AMD was kicking Intel's sad 5-year-old lunch in, that would be news.

    But it's just one of them, and for an Intel fangirl to complain about metric cherry-picking?

    HILARIOUS KARMA
  • Sub31 - Friday, January 10, 2020 - link

    I don't know how or why we've suddenly all gone from lauding each other over perf increases to disowning performance increases (in the same power envelope) as pointless. Truly puzzling.
  • hecksagon - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Nobody who cares about video quality is using NVENC or Quicksync. Software video encoding is the only way to go. In most cases these 8 core parts are approaching NVENC and Quicksync in performance anyways.
  • hecksagon - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Oh, also forgot to add that in the enthusiast market AMD is outselling Intel desktop CPUs almost 2:1. Really excelling at making something nobody wants.
  • Cooe - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Holy delusional fanboy, Batman!!! Zen 2 is dramatically more efficient as far as both power AND thermals than ANYTHING Intel has; with the difference compared to the latest 14nm+++ Skylake derivative nearly on the order of 2x (at least as far as power draw is concerned). 10nm Ice Lake gets things closer, but Zen 2 is still ahead to the point it can pack in 2x the core/thread count in it's max config to boot.

    AMD's literally giving you nearly 2x the multi-threaded performance in the exact same 15W ULV power/thermal envelope as Ice Lake, & with notably better single-thread + significantly better iGPU perf thrown in for good measure. I seriously don't know what more you could have been realistically expecting to have ended up so damn disappointed.
  • timecop1818 - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    > AMD's literally giving you nearly 2x the multi-threaded performance
    Which I (and most people) don't need. 4 fast cores > 16 shitty cores. Also: "benchmarks that benefit from multiple cores perform better with more cores. Who would have thought?!". Oh, but how about real-life usage? Ah... Oops.

    > with notably better single-thread +
    Citation needed. 4% as per their graphs is literally measurement noise and/or some cherry-picked "benchmark" that favored AMD.

    > significantly better iGPU perf
    Yeah but then you have to install fucking radeon drivers, lol.
  • Cooe - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    Holy shit... I'm going to guess you're an extremely uneducated "gamer". If so, here's a news flash buddy, next gen consoles have 8-cores/16-threads (Zen 2 ones in fact), meaning that's the MINIMUM you'll need to get max performance in next gen titles. So do you still wanna tell me that doubling multi-threaded performance in the same thermal/power envelope is still pointless?

    And you are seriously someone who will refuse to install AMD Adrenalin, but then go & voluntarily install the near spyware that is GeForce Experience with a smile on your face? Rofl, oh the hypocrisy *facepalm*...

    Maybe stop taking it from Intel in the butt & being a total freaking dumbass for just a second.... You might want to enjoy it.
  • LordanSS - Monday, January 6, 2020 - link

    I literally manually install my nVidia drivers... won't touch that new GFExperience, not even with a 10feet pole.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now