Display Analysis

Dell offers two display options. The review unit arrived with the first option: a 1920x1200 sRGB display, offering pen and touch support. Dell also offers a 3840x2400 P3-D65 panel, which delivers a higher resolution image with a wider color gamut, but as we've seen time and time again, will come with a stiff hit to battery life. Both feature bonded Corning Gorilla Glass 5 as well, for added durability. In addition, the displays feature a good anti-reflective coating, which is rated at 0.65% reflectivity. This means more viewing of what’s on the display, and less viewing of what’s in the room.

The move back to a taller screen provides a lot of benefits in the laptop space, where doing work often involves the vertical axis. Scrolling spreadsheets or webpages are two basic examples of an added benefit of more vertical pixels, and while it may not seem like a big change to go from 16:9 like most laptops to 16:10, in use it is a very welcome change. It also eliminates the large chin found on the bottom of most laptop displays, and Dell has stretched out the 13.3-inch on the outgoing XPS 13 to a slightly larger 13.4 in the same footprint, without increasing the size of the laptop itself.

The base display offers 169 pixels-per-inch (PPI) pixel density, which, while still well above the standard 92 PPI of old, doesn’t match the Surface Laptop 3, as an example.  But it still offers plenty of resolution for most tasks, and with the added benefit of offering better battery life. But if you do want lots of PPI the 4K option will of course double the PPI to 338, at the cost of money and battery life.

Dell also offers Dolby Vision on both panels, but Dolby Vision on laptops is not what you may think. It will support Dolby Vision video playback in Netflix, but it doesn’t transform the display into an HDR offering. It just works to provide the best picture it can with the hardware available. On the 4K panel though, Dell is offering P3-D65 gamut support as well as HDR 400 certification. It should be a fantastic display in certain scenarios, but be warned that Windows is fairly hamstrung on support for HDR, and especially wide-gamut displays, since its color management is fairly limited.

To see how the display performed, we tested it with Portrait Display’s SpectraCal software with a custom workflow. Brightness and contrast were measured with the X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter, and color accuracy was tested with the X-Rite i1Pro2 spectrophotometer.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The XPS 13 can get exceptionally bright, closing in on 600 nits, while at the same time offering almost 1700:1 contrast ratio. These are fantastic results for a laptop, and especially one that is this portable since it should work well even under bright conditions. If it had a downside, it would be that the display only dims to 27 nits (white), which is far too bright to use as a tablet in bed.

Grayscale

Portrait Displays CalMAN

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Dell has upped their game significantly with the XPS 13 7390. Clearly they’ve employed some color calibration, since the display’s grayscale accuracy is almost perfect, with no error levels over 3.0, and a gamma that closely matches the 2.2 target. The display is slightly cool in its white point, but overall it is a great result.

Gamut


Portrait Displays CalMAN

Display - Gamut Accuracy

Testing the display at 100% levels for the primary and secondary colors shows that Dell has taken their color seriously on this laptop. It pretty much perfectly matches the sRGB color gamut, with great accuracy on all of the colors. All of the results are well under the 3.0 level we consider to be accurate, and most are under the 1.0 level we’d consider imperceptible.

Saturation

Portrait Displays CalMAN

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The saturation sweeps run all of the primary and secondary colors in 4-bit steps from 0% to 100% brightness. The results are nearly perfect, and well under the 3.0 level across the entire range on all six colors.

Gretag Macbeth


Portrait Displays CalMAN

Display - GMB Accuracy

Our final test is the Gretag Macbeth, with tests a variety of colors outside of the primary and secondary axis, and including the important skin tones. None of the tested color points were really even over the 2.0 error level. This is a great result.

Colorchecker


Portrait Displays CalMAN

This shows the relative error level with the target color on the bottom, and the displayed color on the top. Overall the results are near-perfect.

Display Conclusion

The XPS 13 offers one of the best displays on any notebook we’ve tested. The move back to the taller 16:10 aspect ratio is most welcome, and it’s been refreshing to see some manufacturers utilize taller displays such as the 3:2 and 16:10 when it used to be almost impossible to find anything that was not 16:9. The aspect is even more important when you consider this is a convertible laptop, and 16:9 does not work very well as a tablet.

Dell also offers an excellent anti-reflective coating, which will hopefully spur on their competitors to follow suit. This is something Apple’s iPad range has excelled at for some time, but many PCs still have either a matte coating to scatter the light, which also reduces the sharpness of the image, or very reflective glass coatings which are sharp but hard to use outside. The XPS 13 7390 offers both a very bright, and a low reflectivity coating, meaning it should excel in bright environments.

Finally, Dell has calibrated the display, meaning the colors on the XPS 13 are almost perfect.

This combination is a big win for the XPS 13, and provides it yet another area where it excels over its competition.

GPU Performance: Intel Iris Plus Gen11 Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

108 Comments

View All Comments

  • Alistair - Saturday, November 16, 2019 - link

    Did you see the Lenovo Flex 14 with AMD sponsored on Linus Tech Tips today?

    $550 instead of $1000, double the GPU performance (i3 is in this model is not the G7 graphics one), double the CPU performance 4 vs 2 cores, 3 times the memory (12GB instead of 4GB lol Dell). Try that.
  • penev91 - Sunday, November 17, 2019 - link

    Why test it against the Ryzen 5 and not Ryzen 7 with Vega 10?
  • JanW1 - Monday, December 2, 2019 - link

    Maybe there was no Ryzen 7 laptop at hand that has been reviewed? They are not exactly common (well, maybe more common than Icelake laptops actually).

    The real omission I find is not even _mentioning_ that on paper this Intel top-of-the-line iGPU should clearly loose out to AMDs top-of-the line Vega 10 - given the latter gets proper cooling.
    Now since in many laptops the Ryzen 7 Vega 10 does _not_ get enough cooling and throttles to performance levels at or below Ryzen 5 Vega 8 (think about HP Envy x360 for example), maybe the point is moot.
  • hanselltc - Sunday, November 17, 2019 - link

    I guess this isn't charging as much of a premium as MS did for additional integrated storage, but did it really not warranty a mention in the downside part of the conclusion?
  • sbl780 - Sunday, November 17, 2019 - link

    Great review with lots of details. I have an XPS13 9360 (non-2-in-1, 2017 vintage) and love it.

    I would have mentioned that the USB-C charging means that one of the two USB-C ports is unavailable when charging, unless you also use a USB-C dock with power passthrough. (My 9360 can charge by USB-C but also has a dedicated barrel connector for charging.)

    One minor nit is that the model number is, on at least the Final Thoughts page, given as 9370 when it should be 7390.
  • chrkv - Monday, November 18, 2019 - link

    Fourth page "Gen 9.5 graphics, the core of which was first introduced back on Skylake all the way back in 2019" - 2019 doesn't seem to start so long ago to be "all the way back" :) I think you've meant 2015 here.
  • Evil Underlord - Monday, November 18, 2019 - link

    "Complimenting Intel’s CPU upgrades for Ice Lake is an even more extensive upgrade on the GPU side of matters."

    Complimenting the CPU sounds easy enough - it does well in tests. Complementing it, though, that doesn't seem to go so well.

    #GrammarPedantsForTheWin
  • Evil Underlord - Monday, November 18, 2019 - link

    This sounds great! But...

    I use an older XPS13 for work now, and the keyboard is awful. This one sounds substantially worse. I simply won't buy a laptop with a bad keyboard if I can help it, so this Dell is off the list. I'm sticking with Lenovo, despite their many flaws, and the fact their keyboards have gone downhill. They're still better than the competition. If Dell would adopt a sensible keyboard (I don't need a slightly thinner laptop, thanks), I'd buy their product in a flash.

    Good job on the display ratio, though - at last.
  • Reflex - Monday, November 18, 2019 - link

    Not sure what to say to this one, the XPS13 keyboard is great in the ultrabook space. I agree the 2-in-1 takes getting used to and won't be everyone's cup of tea, but the standard XPS13 has one of the best keyboards I've ever used on an ultrabook.
  • svan1971 - Tuesday, November 19, 2019 - link

    more like the icelake thaweth.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now