Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

Performance numbers are not the only metric of interest for the target market. Value additions and other factors play a role too. We have already discussed about the value additions in the first page of this review. In this final section, we first take a look at the thermal performance and power consumption numbers.

Thermals and Power Consumption

The thermal design of the enclosures for HDD-based DAS devices is important because hard drives can't withstand as high a temperature range as flash-based devices. Higher temperatures tend to lower the reliability of the drives. In order to identify the effectiveness with which the enclosure can take away heat from the internal drive, we instrumented our robocopy DAS benchmark suite to record various parameters while the robocopy process took place in the background. Internal temperatures can only be gathered for enclosures that support S.M.A.R.T passthrough. Readers can click on the graphs below to view the full-sized version. The Backup Plus drives have similar thermal profiles - at the end of our sustained writes test (robocopy benchmark), the drive temperatures were only 48C and 49C respectively. The enclosures are made of plastic and do not get unduly hot.

Storage Enclosure Thermal Characteristics

Power consumption is measured while processing the same workload on each of the DAS units. CrystalDiskMark 5.1.2's benchmark traces with a region size of 8GB and the number of repetitions set to 5 are used. For bus-powered devices like the Seagate Backup Plus we are considering today, Plugable's USBC-TKEY power delivery sniffer was placed between the host PC and the storage bridge to record the power consumption. The pictures below present the numbers in a compact and easy to compare manner.

Power Consumption - CrystalDiskMark

Peak power consumption for the 5TB drive was around 4.2W, while the 2TB drive came in at 3.9W. Corresponding idle numbers are 1.4W and 1.1W.

Final Words

The performance profile of the Seagate Backup Plus Portable and Slim drives are as advertised. Which may not seem like high praise, but it's actually a feather in Seagate's cap: the company has been able to tune the firmware of the drives to largely hide the detrimental effects of SMR. It's not perfect, and prolonged use shows more performance degradation compared to traditional CMR drives. But the vast majority of the users are unlikely to notice anything causing significant issues.

On the pricing front, the 5TB drive is available for $95 - $130 (depending on the color), while the 2TB Slim is $55 - $80 (again, color-dependent). The 4TB WD My Passport comes between $100 and $115. On a per-TB basis, the 5TB Backup Plus Portable is quite cost-effective.

 

We would have liked both Seagate Backup Plus drive models to move to a Type-C interface or bundle a Type-C adapter, but those are minor quibbles in the whole scheme of things. The drives offer a unique value proposition in the bus-powered external hard drives market, particularly when the value additions are taken into account. As portable backup drives and for usage in write-once / read-many scenarios, the Seagate Backup Plus Portable and Slim drives are perfect fits. As long as the users are aware of the potential pitfalls / effects of SMR for their use-cases in the long run, the drives are definitely worth consideration.

Investigating SMR for Consumer Workloads
Comments Locked

62 Comments

View All Comments

  • MASSAMKULABOX - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    It should soon ... (?) be able to get a 1tb SSD for 80GBp .. at those sorts of prices I would prefer SSD to HDD. But anything larger is still too expensive ...QLC ????
  • MASSAMKULABOX - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    BTW those graphs are JAckson Pollocks
    (cockney RS)
  • Cygni - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    imagine still using "LUL" in 2k19
  • DigitalFreak - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    First!
  • cbm80 - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    "While Western Digital and Toshiba use conventional magnetic recording (CMR) for their 2.5" hard drives, Seagate makes use of shingled magnetic recording (SMR)."

    I don't think so. They all use SMR for current models.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    I demonstrated that the WD My Passport 4TB drive is not SMR-based in the review, and WD has not updated the capacity point since that drive was launched. All the Toshiba Canvio drives top out at 4TB - at that capacity, there is no need to use SMR.
  • Sunday Afternoon - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    Your WD drive is from 2016. Are you sure that 4TB WD drives from 2019 are CMR?
  • cbm80 - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    The "need" is you can build a 4TB drive with 4 platters instead of 5. WD could have made a 5TB model but chose not to for some reason.
  • MGJ - Wednesday, June 19, 2019 - link

    Again as said in this thread (https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/what-consumer... for 2.5 inches hard disk drive:
    WD Blue WD20SPZX (2TB) and WD10SPZX (1TB),
    Toshiba HDWL120EZSTA (2TB), HDWL120UZSVA (2TB), HDWL110EZSTA (1TB), HDWL110UZSVA (1TB), HDWJ110EZSTA (1TB), HDWJ110UZSVA (1TB), MQ04ABD200 (2TB), MQ04ABF100 (1TB)
    These products are largely integrated in external USB enclosure (Toshiba Canvio, WD Elements, WD My Passport)
  • kepstin - Tuesday, June 18, 2019 - link

    These SMR drives seem to behave a lot more like SSDs than classic hard drives. The CMR section works similarly to SLC cache, the SMR regions are sort of like erase blocks, and I assume the drives do background GC to move data from cache to SMR regions. It's not clear from this review if there's performance degradation on a full drive like SSDs?
    I wonder if trim support would help the controller keep consistency up.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now