GPU Performance

Graphics performance of the Snapdragon 670 is something I admittedly didn’t have too much expectations for. The Adreno 615 of the chipset is a very cut-down version of last year’s Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 845. In fact you shouldn’t be expecting much of an experience beyond light gaming. However as we’ll see there’s one interesting aspect of mid- to low-end GPUs: Their power consumption and sustained performance.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

Starting off with the CPU-bound physics test of 3DMark, we see the Pixel 3a XL again largely fall in the performance category of Snapdragon 835 devices.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

Switching over to 3D stressing workloads, we see some pretty mediocre results from the Pixel 3a XL and the Snapdragon 670. Here the phone and SoC is several generations behind even the S835.

GFXBench Aztec Ruins - High - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen GFXBench Aztec Ruins - Normal - Vulkan/Metal - Off-screen GFXBench Manhattan 3.1 Off-screen GFXBench T-Rex 2.7 Off-screen

Over the rest of the GFXBench benchmarks we continue to see quite lower-end performance. In general the Snapdragon 670’s GPU performance is around ½ to 2/3rd of that of a Snapdragon 835 which puts it about 4 generations behind the top of the line right now.

The interesting aspect of the results is the fact that sustained and peak performance of the phone is essentially identical. There’s a very easy explanation for this: The power consumption of the Snapdragon 670 is so low, that it’s essentially impossible for the device to throttle. In fact, the active system power (load minus idle) of the platform was a meagre 1.5W, a far cry from the 5W+ flagship phones out there. The Pixel 3a merely got luke-warm near the SoC location but otherwise just felt the same as the ambient temperature.

System Performance Display Measurement
Comments Locked

94 Comments

View All Comments

  • MadManMark - Monday, July 1, 2019 - link

    Andrei: I, you, and every person in North America could get the 3a for $210 right after it came out, no carrier or financing needed, just by buying directly from Google Store and signing up for a $250 trade-in for an iPhone 6. We just then bought a refurb iPhone 6 from another site for $60 and !voila! you have a Pixel 3a for $210, free and clear. That deal ran for a full month. ***and*** for part of that month, googel aslo threw in a $100 future store credit.
  • UtilityMax - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    Why buy a new car at MSRP when you, and every person in America, could go to an Oprah show a couple years ago and get keys to a new VW car. Duh!
  • SonjaTWilliams - Sunday, June 30, 2019 - link

    nice
  • Rorqual - Monday, July 1, 2019 - link

    I bought a Pixel 3a a few days after its availability, in order to replace an aging Nexus 5X, and am very happy with it.
    - About pricing: there was a promotion and for €400 a Google Home Mini (60 € value) got bundled, so net price for the phone is €340 which is I think not a bad deal for what I get.
    - Plastic casing: for me it's a huge plus. I certainly don't want any glass backpanel, so slippery and fragile. And I'm one of those who don't use a protective case (a few scratches here and there aren't a problem to me).
    - Design: good enough, classic and functional. No notch is mandatory, I can't stand them.
    - Stock Adroid: again, mandatory. I can't stand the Samsung interface, for instance. Some others are more tolerable, but still I prefer stock Android.
    - SoC performance: good enough for my usage, that is browsing, GPS and some random apps (very few games). Way faster then the 5X, everything feels so fluid now.

    So with such specifications, the 3a is a godsend.
  • MadManMark - Monday, July 1, 2019 - link

    "So with such specifications, the 3a is a godsend."

    +1
    Frankly the main thing its missing is an SD slot. But I guess I've finally given up that fight ... I think this is the first phone I've ever had that doesn't have one.
  • InvidiousIgnoramus - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 - link

    "Mid range"
    I remember when this term still referred to $200-300 devices. I paid less than this for my last two flagship devices, and neither were even a year old.
  • grant3 - Friday, July 5, 2019 - link

    In those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. Give me five bees for a quarter, you'd say.
  • DontTreadOnMe - Friday, July 5, 2019 - link

    Xiaomi Mi9 may be more competetive on price in Europe, but at the time of writing people are complaining that they are still on the April 2019 security update. This is a consideration that severely restricts choices. The question is: what are the real costs of staying un-patched for longer?
  • pika2000 - Wednesday, July 10, 2019 - link

    In reality, does updates really mater? I mean in reality, how many Android phones without the most current updates get breached? Considering the marketshare, we would've heard plenty of news about phones on 2018/2017 security patches and/or on Oreo/Nougat and below being breached. But we don't.
  • gronetwork - Wednesday, July 10, 2019 - link

    This is a light version of the Google Pixel 3 XL, the processor has also 8 cores, with lower frequencies, it has the same quantity of RAM memory, the camera is similar, the battery capacity is larger, as well as the battery life. It is a good deal even if the performance is 35% less.

    https://gadgetversus.com/smartphone/google-pixel-3...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now