Camera - Daylight Evaluation

Having covered the OnePlus 7 Pro’s main feature, the 90Hz screen, the other major selling-point of the phone is its triple-camera setup.

The main camera is a 48MP Sony IMX586 sensor with an f/1.6 aperture lens and OIS. It’s to be noted that OnePlus does one thing right with the new sensor: It largely ignores the 48MP mode and is generally inaccessible besides in the Pro Mode. In general for all intents and purposes this is a 12MP camera shoot, and there’s nothing wrong with that. As we’ve seen reviewed in several other phones over the last year, the sensor’s native resolution capture mode comes with big compromises in terms of dynamic range and in 90% of the cases it’s not something I would recommend users to use.

The wide-angle and telephoto modules on the OP7Pro are also a first for the company, and allows the phone to match the features of the highest end Samsung and Huawei devices. We expect essentially every vendor this year to adopt the triple-camera setup in their flagships, so it’s a must-have in order to compete in the photography department.

Latest Firmware Update as of Writing

Also I have to make a big mention regarding the firmware version this review was written on: Initially I had already completed a camera testing round on the 9.5.5 firmware when I had received the phone, but then OnePlus had released the new OxygenOS 9.5.7 version which had major changes in the camera processing department as well as updating the Nightscape mode with a new improved algorithm, so I've redone the whole camera testing on the new firmware.

This review is also done with Samsung’s latest May firmware update on the Exynos S10 variant which also has major improvements, and coincidentally Huawei had also pushed a big update for the P30Pro which in turn also says to have improved camera performance.

It’s a bit annoying for us reviewers as camera performance is a continuously changing aspect of a new phone following its release (It’s one of the very last things OEMs spend development time on), but hopefully this review gives readers a good representative evaluation of what to expect of the phones for the rest of the year, including the new OnePlus 7 Pro.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ Honor 20 Pro ]
[ G8 ] - [ Oppo Reno ]
[ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

In the first scene there’s a lot of detail and high natural dynamic range as it was a clear day with the sun shining, while also having a lot of darker shadows in the scene.

The OP7Pro does a good job in terms of exposure and composition, however we do notice it lags behind the S10 in ability to capture the true brightness of the scene as well as the more natural saturation of the greenery.

I included the Honor 20 Pro into this review purposely because it has the very same IMX586 sensor as the OnePlus 7 Pro, with the differences between the two phones being that one is running on the Snapdragon 855 and the other is using the Kirin 980 chipset. Naturally each vendor’s camera calibration will also come into play here. This also applies to the Oppo Reno, again using the same popular sensor.

Unfortunately for the OP7Pro, the H20Pro has notably better colours and better HDR, something particularly visible on the highlights of the large hedges. The OnePlus tends to flatten things too much. The shadow captures also remind one very much of the Pixel 3, although it’s not quite as terrible as on the Google phone; here the S10 and iPhone XS’s dynamic range is just much better. OnePlus’ cousin the Oppo Reno also seems to have better handling of details throughout the scene as it’s not washing textures out as much.

We see about the same differences in the wide-angle lens of the OP7Pro: The composition is good, however things are flattened out too much as textures are washed out compared to other phones with wide-angle modules (Well, besides LG), albeit we are talking about different sensors this time around.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ Honor 20 Pro ]
[ G8 ] - [ Oppo Reno ]
[ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

This next scene was actually a bit shocking to me when I was sorting the pictures as I couldn’t believe just how many phones outright failed to get acceptable results. This was actually a sunny day with intermittent cloud cover, and the scene in question was overcast by a larger cloud during the captures. The background clouds however were extremely bright and I think a lot of phones failed because of this.

The OnePlus 6T’s result was particularly potato-quality as its HDR algorithm decided to get rid of all intensity levels beyond 75% luminosity. Overall I find it quite a pity with what OnePlus had done with the 6T as I deemed the OP6 last year to be among the best daytime cameras out there.

Nevertheless, this is about the 7 Pro, and here the new phone does a lot better than the 6T and it manages to get a reasonable exposure. Still it’s not really enough to keep up with the competition as the scene is too dark and the shadows in particularly are artificially too pronounced. The Exynos S10 fell flat when it came to colours, leaving the Snapdragon S10 as the only phone with a good representation of the scene, even if the background sky was blown out.

The wide-angle on the OP7 Pro is good, although again it’s having too dark shadows and the colour temperature is also slightly too warm. What’s interesting here is that in terms of viewing angle, the OP7 Pro is similar to other phones such as the H20Pro, Reno and G8, however the OnePlus has a massively more pronounced distortion on the lens, as seen by the curvature of the ledge at the bottom of the screen.

I found the zoom lens of the OP7 Pro here to be quite excellent. The 3x effective factor results in extremely sharp images throughout the scene, and although the exposure wasn’t challenging here, it was very good.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ]
[ Honor 20 Pro ] - [ G8 ]
[ Oppo Reno ]
[ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

The next scene is also an excellent showcase how having the same sensor doesn’t really mean too much in terms of the resulting picture: The OP7Pro, H20Pro and Reno have absolutely nothing in common in terms of the end image.

The picture’s histograms between the OP7Pro and Pixel 3 are shockingly similar, with both phones ending up with similar compositions. However they’re both too dark and wrong colour temperature (The 6T does much better here). The Galaxy S10 is the best representation of the actual scene.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ Honor 20 Pro ]
[ G8 ] - [ Oppo Reno ]
[ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

The next scene is a lot easier in terms of exposure and the OP7Pro ends up with a good composition. Its weaknesses is again similar to that of the Pixel 3 and older phones in that it doesn’t have any dynamic range in the shadows for what is essentially broad daylight.

The Honor 20 Pro showcases that the sensor is able to capture a lot more, and also it doesn’t wash out textures as seen on the OnePlus phone in the road, sidewalk and building façade.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ Honor 20 Pro ] - [ G8 ]
[ Oppo Reno ] - [ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

Continuing on a relatively bad streak, this next scene also isn’t too kind to the OP7Pro. Here it’s actually the 6T which best showcases the 7Pro’s lackings in terms of texture detail as well as shadow exposure. The Honor 20 Pro and Reno both again showcase the hardware should be able to achieve better.

The wide-angle here is good, although again lacking in shadows. It’s at least nice to see that OnePlus’ processing between the main and wide-angle is extremely similar with little to no difference in the vast majority of scenarios, so that’s a plus.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ Honor 20 Pro ]
[ G8 ] - [ Oppo Reno ]
[ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

This last every-day scene again showcases the OP7Pro’s tendency to seemingly destroy shadows and the best example of this is the 6T. Even though the 6T has its own issues here such as flattening highlights too much, it’s able to accurately portray the shop fronts while the OP7 tends to almost clip to black (And actually does so).

The wide angle here did some quite aggressive HDR and brought down the sun-lit foreground street to almost the same levels as the shadow cast parts, something the P30 Pro also erroneously decided to do.

The telephoto module here again performed excellently, resolving a fantastic amount of detail at this magnification level. The only odd thing is that the saturation intensities are quite low, and elements such as the “Coolcat” shop logo ended up completely muted compared to all other phones’ telephoto modules.

Click for full image
[ OnePlus 7 Pro ] - [ OnePlus 6T ]
[ S10+ (E) ] - [ S10+ (S) ]
[ P30 Pro ] - [ Honor 20 Pro ]
[ G8 ] - [ Oppo Reno ]
[ Pixel 3 ] - [ Pixel 3a ] - [ iPhone XS ]

Finally this last scene is just a hard task for any phone and simply a test of the raw dynamic range of the phones; taking a picture against the sun.

The OP7Pro still manages to get good black points in post-processing, although doesn’t match Huawei or Samsung in terms of dynamic range. Oddly enough the phone’s wide-angle achieves a lot better results here.

The telephoto also does very well in prioritising the actual scene, as opposed to the dark shots of the P30Pro and Honor 20 Pro.

Daylight Camera Conclusion

Overall, I was relatively disappointed by the OnePlus 7 Pro’s daylight capture performance. Having the Honor 20 Pro and the Oppo Reno in this camera comparison has showcased that this isn’t inherently an issue of the camera’s hardware and the Sony IMX586 sensor, but rather something on the part of OnePlus’ camera calibration and post-processing algorithms.

The two most egregious issues with the main camera sensor shot is the fact that OnePlus tends to wash out textures a lot more, and that it gives too little priority to shadows. The first issue is actually quite bad in some cases as we’ve had some shots in which the OnePlus 6T actually fared better.

The issue of the dark and even clipped shadows reminds me a lot of the Pixel’s processing. I do really hope that OnePlus wasn’t trying to mimic Google’s processing here and that this is just an issue of the exposure algorithms rather than an intentional post-processing effect in order to add contrast to the pictures. I was never impressed by this part of the Pixel’s camera and is easily the single worst aspect for OnePlus to have in common with.

The wide-angle module, much like on other phones, is an outstanding addition to the capture experience of the phone. In terms of actual picture results, it shares the same processing issues as the main camera. While this is to expected of a wide-angle module, the chromatic aberrations and distortions on the very edges of the frame are exceptionally pronounced on the OP7Pro, pointing out to rather low quality optics.

Finally, I didn’t have any major issues with the new 3x telephoto lens. I was actually quite impressed by the detail the module was able to resolve, and I don’t feel it has as many processing issues as the other two modules.

Overall, whilst the OnePlus 7 Pro’s camera in daylight isn’t outright bad, it really can’t claim it’s a flagship killer as it gets bested by a lot of phones, including from Huawei, Honor, Samsung.

Battery Life - As Expected Camera - Low Light Evaluation
Comments Locked

91 Comments

View All Comments

  • s.yu - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    Wow, an HTC user in the wild! I haven't seen one in years. Anandtech probably doesn't get review units either.
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    HTC essentially sold its smartphone development personnel to Google. They're effectively out of the business I think.
  • s.yu - Friday, June 21, 2019 - link

    Just the Pixel division, which is the only profitable division. They kept the rest.
  • silverblue - Friday, June 21, 2019 - link

    Yeah; I have a U11, and it's served me relatively well.
  • WesJ - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    First time using this website, the thoroughness of your article prompted me to make an account. Great content!
  • pjcamp - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    These days, it isn't a phone with a camera perk as much as it is a camera with a phone perk. You have to get the camera right and that means not leaving it until last. Design the phone around the camera, not the camera around the phone.

    Other than that, it is the usual list of Never Settle OnePlus's things you have to settle for -- no SD, now headphone jack (despite their own users clamoring to keep it), and now a fully glass device with no wireless charging to justify it.
  • Anirudh2FL - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    Great phone, but is the UI and web browser scrolling as smooth as iOS Andrei ?

    Thanks in advance
    Nice review
  • abufrejoval - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    Great review, that depth and detail is outstanding.

    I'd have loved the display size, resolution and refresh rate, but with the stupid curved display and the silly pop-up camera, it falls off the cliff, before money even matters.

    Too bad the non-plus doesn't have these aces to play.

    Actually if that had the resolution and the refresh even without the extra size, it could do really well with my LeEco VR frame for VR or 3D movies on longer flights or train rides.

    The LeEco Le Max2 proves the extra resolution right but the 820 SoC could benefit from an 855 update and the OnePlus 5 shows its 1920x1080 pentile resolution centimeters from the eye while VR really benefits from speed and refresh.

    I'd like some words on desktop mode support or if external DP is supported natively or via DisplayLink... These devices certainly have enough horse power for desktop work and if you need to pay those prices, not having to buy a slower Chrome- or Notebook certainly helps.

    So I'll just stick with the 5 and see if reason returns.
  • flyingpants265 - Sunday, June 23, 2019 - link

    The pop-up camera is not silly. If you really need to take selfies, you can stomach it until next year.
  • leophyrox - Thursday, June 20, 2019 - link

    What is the storage speeds of the UFS 3.0 that has been touted? I was hoping it'd be shown in an AT review.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now