While the bulk of this morning’s AMD Computex keynote has been on AMD’s 3rd generation Ryzen CPUs and their underlying Zen 2 architecture, the company also took a moment to briefly touch upon its highly anticipated Navi GPU architecture and associated family of products. AMD didn’t go too deep here, but they have given us just enough to be tantalized ahead of a full reveal in the not too distant future. The first Navi cards will be the Radeon RX 5700 series, which are launching in July and on an architectural level will offer 25% better performance per clock per core and 50% better power efficiency than AMD’s current-generation Vega architecture. The products will also be AMD's first video cards using faster GDDR6 memory. Meanwhile AMD isn’t offering much in the way of concrete details on performance, but they are showing it off versus NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 2070 in the AMD-favorable game Strange Brigade.

A Peek At the Navi GPU Architecture

Compared to today’s Ryzen information AMD is being a lot more modest – there’s no specific SKU information for a start – but they are offering us our first architectural details on Navi since we learned in 2016 that it would bring “next gen memory” support. First and foremost, AMD has been tinkering with their GPU architecture to improve both the effective IPC and memory bandwidth efficiency. In what the company is calling their Radeon DNA (RNDA) archtiecture – I should note that it’s not clear if this is a branding exercise to downplay the GCN family name or if it's a more heavily overhauled architecture – AMD has revealed that Navi’s compute units have been redesigned to improve their efficiency. AMD's press materials also note that, regardless of the above changes, the size hasn't changed: a single CU is still 64 stream processors.

Altogether, a Navi core/CU should be 25% faster than a Vega core on a clock-for-clock basis. The devil is in the details of course – AMD's data is based off of their internal testing, taking the geomean of 30 games tested at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings and 4x AA, so it's not a holistic view of just the core architecture – but it’s still potentially one of AMD’s largest GPU IPC gains in the last several years. AMD’s presentation also noted that this was part of a larger streamlining of the graphics pipeline, which is designed for both higher IPCs and high clockspeeds. For reference, on the same process AMD has been able to push Radeon VII well past its comfort/efficiency point to 1750MHz, so it will be interesting to see how Navi compares.

Feeding the beast is a new multi-level cache hierarchy. AMD is touting that Navi’s cache subsystem offers both higher performance and lower latency than Vega’s, all for less power consumption. AMD has always been hamstrung a bit by memory/cache bottlenecks, so this would be a promising development for AMD’s GPU architecture. Meanwhile for a bit of reference, Vega already implemented a more modern cache hierarchy, so it would seem unlikely that AMD is changing their cache levels or what blocks are clients of which caches.

AMD's memory controllers themselves have also been updated. Long expected, and confirmed in the press release that went out after Dr. Lisa Su's keynote, the upcoming RX 5700 series cards use GDDR6 memory, which should give AMD's cards a hearty bandwidth bump over their comparable GDDR5 Polaris cards.

It's also worth noting that, fittingly, the new Navi parts support PCI Express 4.0 as well. This will actually be AMD's second GPU with PCIe 4.0 functionality – Vega 20 was first, but it's only enabled in the Radeon Instinct parts – so this is the first time it's enabled in a consumer part. Of course to make full use of it you'll need a PCI 4.0-capable host, which AMD is happy to sell you as well. As for the performance impacts, these remain to be seen. Thus far high-end AMD/NVIDIA parts haven't been significantly bottlenecked in games by PCIe 3.0 x16 (or even x8), so it will be interesting to see how much the extra bus bandwidth helps these first generation of parts.

Last but certainly not least of course is overall power efficacy. Thanks to the combination of AMD’s architectural improvements and TSMC’s 7nm process, AMD is promoting a 50% increase in performance per watt for Navi. Power efficiency is AMD’s Achilles heel relative to NVIDIA, so this is another area where we’re eager to see AMD catch up. It should be noted however that this statement didn’t come with a qualifier – if it’s 50% more efficient at the same clockspeeds as Vega or a given total card TDP – which can impact the meaningfulness somewhat. For Polaris/Vega, AMD opted to push their cards well up the voltage/frequency curve in order to maximize performance at a cost to power consumption, so power efficiency is fluid based on what clockspeeds AMD ships at.

Update: Since there have been some questions about what the efficiency number is in reference to – if it's against the 7nm Vega 20 GPU or the 14nm Vega 10 GPU – I went back over AMD's keynote presentation and transcribed it. Here is what Dr. Lisa Su specifically said on the subject (emphasis mine).

And then, when you put that together, both the architecture – the design capability – as well as the process technology, we're seeing 1.5x or higher performance per watt capability on the new Navi products

So while I will hold off on calling this the definitive word until we've had a full technology briefing, at first glance it would seem that the 50% efficiency gain is a combination of architecture and the move from GloFo 14nm to TSMC 7nm.

Radeon RX 5700 Series: Coming in July

Alongside the architecture teaser, AMD also offered up some high-level details about the first Navi video cards. Navi will be sold under AMD’s RX 5000 series of video cards – that’s right, after Vega and Radeon VII, they’re going back to distinct series numbers. The RX 5000 series means that AMD is making a big jump in their numbering system, going back to 4 digits and back to the 5000 series. Officially, this is because AMD is celebrating its 50th year in business this year – so of course the product numbers need to start with a 50. However long-time observers will note that it’s been 10 years now since AMD’s previous 5000 series of video cards, the well-received Radeon HD 5000 series, and AMD may be trying to capture a bit of that.

Of the RX 5000 cards, the first series will be the RX 5700. These will be launching in July. AMD is also showing off the specific Navi GPU that will be used here, though as far as AMD’s numbering system goes, we don’t know whether this is Navi 10 or another GPU model number.

This is a traditional, monolithic die with a significant pin count package. So if I were a betting man (ed: you still owe me a steak), then I’d expect it to be paired up with GDDR6. (ed again: this has since been confirmed by AMD's press release)

Update: Thanks to our own Andrei Frumusanu for doing the leg work, we now have a die size estimate based on these and some unpublished photos. Our working guess right now is 275mm2, give or take a few percent. Though that's going to be less precise than what a proper micro-caliper measurement will turn up, so this is very much still just an estimate.

Finally, while AMD isn’t giving us concrete performance information, the company did use its Computex keynote to briefly demonstrate performance on the card versus NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 2070, a $500 video card. While this is a game that favors AMD to begin with, it’s a promising sign that they’re able to pull ahead of mid-to-high-end NVIDIA card by 10%. Which means we’re all going to be eagerly awaiting more information on the video card as AMD ramps up for their July launch.

AMD's next big gaming event will be their E3 2019 Next Horizing Gaming Event, and AMD tells us that we'll find out more about the RX 5000 series there. So stay tuned.

POST A COMMENT

99 Comments

View All Comments

  • mikato - Thursday, May 30, 2019 - link

    No no no :) The RX 580 is still the mid-range card to get. Reply
  • silverblue - Friday, May 31, 2019 - link

    I'd consider the 2080 Ti to be enthusiast, 2070/2080 to be high-end, 1660 Ti/2060 to be upper mid-range, 1060/1660 to be lower mid-range, 1650 to be budget and anything below to be entry-level. I know that's rather broad but given that most people still game in 1080p and that mid-range cards generally offer that level at 60fps with high or ultra details and sell the most, that's the mainstream or mid-range, with 1440p and 4K at the same settings being the mark of high-end and enthusiast respectively. That's just my opinion, though. Reply
  • Moody66 - Wednesday, May 29, 2019 - link

    She said they would continue gcn with the vega line for professionals. NAVI is not GCN. Reply
  • CiccioB - Wednesday, May 29, 2019 - link

    Yes it is.
    Just a reworked GCN with a different number of graphics engine, but substantially it is the same architecture underline.
    A different architecture would have provided new features, like new advanced geometry engines (and not only more than the old simple ones), tensor core and possibly new cores for RT acceleration and INT execution in parallel with FP to improve IPC for real.

    As it appears now it is only the same GCN shaders differently arranged in new graphics engine with a new (again) cache hierarchy.
    Reply
  • CiccioB - Wednesday, May 29, 2019 - link

    I would add that the changes in the graphics engine are not going to help GCN work better in the HPC/DC world, but they are only new transistors aimed at making the 3d pipeline work better/faster and try to shorten the gap with respect to nvidia architecture that works like a charm with respect to the resources and power it uses to male the same work.
    That's why Navi is not going to be brought to HPC/DC market. It will just be bigger with no practical advantage for that kind of works.
    Reply
  • imaskar - Sunday, June 02, 2019 - link

    Can someone explain, why doing 10% better, than competitor's pre-flagship is good? It means it is actually looses to RTX2080, right? Reply
  • dr.denton - Monday, June 03, 2019 - link

    The RX5700 series are mid-range chips, intended as competition to RTX2070/2060. A better question to ask would be: why is the RTX2070 only roughly as fast as last generation's high-end product? Reply
  • marksilvester07 - Monday, June 03, 2019 - link

    All the contents are mentioned in this article. I will keep it in mind, thanks for sharing the information keep updating, looking forward to more posts. https://www.quickenassist.com/blog/how-to-recover-... Reply
  • RobJoy - Monday, June 24, 2019 - link

    All you are so damn concerned about percentages and numbers posted that most of you fail to accept the fact, that the only thing that really matters is the actual performance/price.

    If Nvidia has anything at that price range and performance range, you should only be concerned about comparing it with that.

    It really, really does not matter if Nvidia pulls a rabbit out of their ass, if it can't compete for same performance at same or lower price.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now