HTPC Credentials - Local Media Playback and Video Processing

Evaluation of local media playback and video processing is done by playing back files encompassing a range of relevant codecs, containers, resolutions, and frame rates. A note of the efficiency is also made by tracking GPU usage and power consumption of the system at the wall. Users have their own preference for the playback software / decoder / renderer, and our aim is to have numbers representative of commonly encountered scenarios. Towards this, we played back the test streams using the following combinations:

  • MPC-HC x64 1.8.5 + LAV Video Decoder (DXVA2 Native) + Enhanced Video Renderer - Custom Presenter (EVR-CP)
  • MPC-HC x64 1.8.5 + LAV Video Decoder (D3D11) + madVR 0.92.17 (DXVA-Focused)
  • MPC-HC x64 1.8.5 + LAV Video Decoder (D3D11) + madVR 0.92.17 (Lanczos-Focused)
  • VLC 3.0.6
  • Kodi 18.1

The thirteen test streams (each of 90s duration) were played back from the local disk with an interval of 30 seconds in-between. Various metrics including GPU usage and at-wall power consumption were recorded during the course of this playback. Prior to looking at the metrics, a quick summary of the decoding capabilities of the Intel UHD Graphics 620 in the Core i7-8550U of the ZBOX CI660 nano is useful to have for context.

The GPU supports hardware-accelerated decoding for all popular codecs at up to 4K for AVC and older codecs, and up to 8K for the newer HEVC and VP9 variants.

All our playback tests were done with the desktop HDR setting turned off.

VLC and Kodi

VLC is the playback software of choice for the average PC user who doesn't need a ten-foot UI. Its install-and-play simplicity has made it extremely popular. Over the years, the software has gained the ability to take advantage of various hardware acceleration options. Kodi, on the other hand, has a ten-foot UI making it the perfect open-source software for dedicated HTPCs. Support for add-ons make it very extensible and capable of customization. We played back our test files using the default VLC and Kodi configurations, and recorded the following metrics.

Video Playback Efficiency - VLC and Kodi

There is no hardware acceleration for playback of VP9 Profile 2 streams with VLC, but, Kodi has no issues. The average at-wall power consumption for hardware-accelerated playback is around 15-20W for VLC and 18-20W for Kodi. For software decoding of VP9 Profile 2 using VLC, the at-wall power consumption is around 45W. We do not see GPU D3D or media engine usage going above 80% for any of our test streams with either VLC or Kodi.

MPC-HC

MPC-HC offers an easy way to test out different combinations of decoders and renderers. The first configuration we evaluated is the default post-install scenario, with only the in-built LAV Video Decoder forced to DXVA2 Native mode. Two additional passes were done with different madVR configurations. In the first one (DXVA-focused), we configured madVR to make use of the DXVA-accelerated video processing capabilities as much as possible. In the second (Lanczos-focused), the image scaling algorithms were set to 'Lanczos 3-tap, with anti-ringing checked'. Chroma upscaling was configured to be 'BiCubic 75 with anti-ringing checked' in both cases. The metrics collected during the playback of the test files using the above three configurations are presented below.

Video Playback Efficiency - MPC-HC with EVR-CP and madVR

The default configuration (EVRCP + DXVA2 Native) appears to be the best bet for playback in the ZBOX CI660 nano. madVR configurations do not work for the playback of any 4K stream, as can be seen from the above graphs (the playback rate is less than half of the real-time requirement, even though the GPU load is not high). This is along expected lines, given the capabilities of the Intel UHD Graphics 620 GPU.

HTPC Credentials - YouTube and Netflix Streaming Miscellaneous Aspects: Power & Temperatures
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    They could have shaved like $200 off the price going with a i5-8350U, which is essentially 98% as fast across the board because the i7 can only hit 4GHz on 1 active core.
  • snakyjake - Thursday, April 18, 2019 - link

    How does this compare to Intel NUC for HTPC?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now