System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z390 we are running an updated version of our test suite, including OS and CPU cooler. This has some effect on our results.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

In a long idle power state, both the ASUS ROG Strix Z390-I Gaming and ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac perform well, however in an OS idle state, the Phantom Gaming board was very power hungry; the hungriest so far in our Z390 tests. At full load, both boards both performed competitively within 3% of each other and sit towards the middle of our graphs.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

The ASUS ROG Strix Z390-I Gaming managed to record the fastest POST time from any of the LGA1151 motherboards tested so far, both at stock settings and with controllers disabled. Just behind it is the ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac by a couple of seconds, but still ahead of most of the boards previously tested.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

Not a single of the LGA1151 models we've tested thus far has been optimized for DPC latency, but both the mini-ITX sized boards on test managed to perform better than the rest of the pack. The Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac came out on top with the Strix Z390-I Gaming not too far behind.

Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

26 Comments

View All Comments

  • JlHADJOE - Wednesday, February 20, 2019 - link

    Separate companies, but essentially the same owners. Look at the directors of Pegatron and it's full of people who hold similar positions at ASUS.

    Pegatron's president and CEO, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/p...">Syh-Jang Liao for example also sits on the board of ASUSPower Corporate and ASUSPower Investment.

    Pegatron's Chairman and Group CEO, https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/p...">T.H. Tung likewise chairs ASUS Investment and ASUSTek investment.

    You can do this with all of the officers and board members in https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/...">Pegatron and you'll be hard pressed to find anyone who isn't also at ASUS. Basically Pegatron and ASRock were "spun off" so that their friends could put money in it, but the original ASUS people are all still there running the show.
  • JlHADJOE - Wednesday, February 20, 2019 - link

    Comments section didn't like BBcode so clean links here:

    Syh-Jang Liao: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/p...

    T.H. Tung: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/p...

    Pegatron: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/...
  • stuhad - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Full bandwidth on the Thunderbolt connection?
  • u.of.ipod - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    looks like the 'final words' section is missing
  • secretanchitman - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    I have the Asrock board and it's been damn solid - fully recommend it!
  • romrunning - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    The main feature chart for the ASRock shows the Thunderbolt 3 USB-C port next to "USB 3.1 (10 Gbps)"; however, that seems to be doing it a disservice as TB3 can go up to 40GBps, not just 10.

    Does this mean that the TB3 port is limited to 10Gbps somehow? Or is it only meant to say that the TB3 port can fall back to USB 3.1G2 mode?

    Or is it just stuffing data into a cell when another row should/could have been added?
  • eva02langley - Tuesday, February 12, 2019 - link

    Really expensive for a mini-itx board. I got mine for 130$, but it is a B450, but the features are similar.
  • crotach - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    I got a Yugo for a much lower price than a Ferrari, but the features are similar.
  • Nutty667 - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    I'm amazed there's upto 5fps difference at 4K in ROTTR with the same gpu/cpu combo. Surely that should be purely GPU workload there. Can anyone explain the difference ?
  • zodiacfml - Wednesday, February 13, 2019 - link

    Impressive but Intel is lagging for at least several months. i'd be looking at AMD systems until Intel gets their thing in 1st half of 2020.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now