DC RAM Overclocking Performance

Memory overclocking can usually be approached in multiple ways. DDR4 Memory kits come supplied with integrated 'XMP 2.0' profiles which means users don't really need to do anything other than clicking a button inside the BIOS in order to achieve the memory kit's rated performance. However manual tweaking is required to go further.

The fine art of memory overclocking is a long and windy road for minimal performance gains. It almost becomes a performance piece, needing a seasoned expert to get the best out of it. However most users can at least adjust the frequency the primary latencies. The frequency which can be changed via the strap/multiplier and through the base clock generator is more common, while the timings are usually done as the second step once a stable frequency has been found. 

Both of the memory modules we have are equipped with Samsung B-die chips. These chips are often considered some of the best overclocking parts, however there is some natural speculation as to how they will perform in this double height form factor.

To measure the overclockability of the DC RAM, the stock performance with the XMP 2.0 profile applied on both the G.Skill TridentZ RGB DC and ZADAK Shield RGB DC 2x32 GB kits are used as a baseline. We exokired both pushing the frequency as high as could be managed, and then with latencies as tight as much as possible. As WinRAR 5.40 proved one of the more memory sensitive benchmarks in our list, we used this to highlight the performance, if any, from the DC memory.

Highest 24/7 Frequency at 16-16-16: DDR4-3500

The maximum overclock we managed to achieve with a voltage of 1.5 V on the DRAM for each kit is as follows:

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DC - DDR4-3500 16-16-16-38
ZADAK Shield RGB DC - DDR4-3500 16-16-16-38

We were unable to go beyond DDR4-3500 even with 18-18-18 sub-timings.

Best 24/7 Latencies at DDR4-3200: 12-12-12

The tightest timings while keeping the frequency at their XMP rating of DDR4-3200 with a voltage of 1.5 V on the DRAM is as follows:

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DC - DDR4-3200 12-12-12-32
ZADAK Shield RGB DC - DDR4-3200 12-12-12-28

Overall Reasonable Overclock: DDR4-3400 14-14-14 at 1.5 V

The highest achieved DRAM frequency achieved with tighter timing adjustments with a voltage of 1.5 V on each kit is as follows:

G.Skill TridentZ RGB DC - DDR4-3400 14-14-14-34
ZADAK Shield RGB DC - DDR4-3400 14-14-14-32

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40 - Overclocking Performance

As our maximum achieved overclocks show, there isn't much additional headroom available to push the dual capacity DRAM much further than the XMP 2.0 profiles already allow. Both the G.Skill and ZADAK kits allowed us to overclock up to DDR4-3500 with 16-16-16-38 at 1.5 V. Any attempt to go past DDR4-3500 would result in failed POST even with timings slackened as loose as up to CL18. When it came to tightening up the latency timings, both kits experienced similar timings with the G.Skill TridentZ RGB DC allowing for DDR4-3200 14-14-14-32, with the ZADAK Shield RGB DC giving slightly tighter tRAS timing with DDR4-3200 14-14-14-28.

Users thinking that overclocking will be as prosperous as others have achieved on DRAM in 1Rx8 or 2Rx8 featuring Samsung B-die ICs aren't going to be as happy with the headroom on these modules. The headroom available is limited and the performance displayed in our WinRAR test was mirrored here. On the G.Skill TridentZ RGB DC kit a total of 0.9 seconds with a mixture of frequency and timing adjustments equalling DDR4-3400 14-14-14-34 applied. Overclocking the ZADAK Shield RGB DC memory to DDR4-3400 14-14-14-32 proved the best settings that we tried with a reduction of 1.3 seconds. Answering any questions about the overclocking ability of the memory, our testing with the samples we received proved dreary in comparison to what's usually expected from Samsung B-die ICs.

Power Analysis Double Height DDR4 Conclusion
Comments Locked

50 Comments

View All Comments

  • Bp_968 - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    Or you could go with an AMD board and get to keep the ECC features enabled. :)
  • KarlKastor - Friday, January 25, 2019 - link

    How do u disable registered capability on a reg. DIMM? They are physically different to UDIMMs. Thats absolutely BS.
    You can run ECC UDIMM on every board, maybe without ECC working. But you will never run reg. DIMM on Hardware not supporting reg. DIMMs
  • nevcairiel - Wednesday, January 23, 2019 - link

    You cannot use ECC registered RAM on consumer motherboards.
  • CheapSushi - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    Yes you can. It depends on the CPU/BIOS.
  • jordanclock - Wednesday, January 23, 2019 - link

    The kind of systems that use ECC RAM aren't the kind of systems that are going to see any overclocking.
  • alpha754293 - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    To the best of my knowledge, you can put ECC RDIMMs in consumer-grade systems where you have overclocking capabilities made apparent and available to you just as people have overclocked Xeons before.

    Just because you have RDIMMs doesn't necessarily mean that you have to only use them with a motherboard that supports and requires the use of RDIMMs. (In fact, many motherboards that recommend using RDIMMs will also run with UDIMMs, but usually with a lower installed capacity limit.)
  • Lord of the Bored - Wednesday, January 23, 2019 - link

    Wouldn't two DIMMs on one card be a quad in-line memory module(QIMM)?
  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    No, because this approach doesn't make the memory bus any wider, it just stacks the memory deeper on the same bus than a normal DIMM would.
  • Lord of the Bored - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    But both 8- and 32-bit SIMMs existed under the same name, so it clearly isn't bus width the name refers to.

    For what it is worth, I was wrong for a different reason. Research indicates that the D refers to rows of contacts. In a SIMM, the backside contacts were electrically the same as the frontside contacts, so there was only a single row. In a DIMM, they aren't, so you have dual contact rows. And since this still only has two rows of contacts...
  • Targon - Thursday, January 24, 2019 - link

    The connection to the motherboard and support in the BIOS and memory controller are the key. More memory on the same memory channel will not boost performance, and will even degrade performance a bit due to needing to connect the additional memory on the same channel.

    DDR5(not to be confused with GDDR5) will help. Going to Gen-Z where the memory can connect to the Gen-Z bus might potentially help as well if done right, because you want that memory bus to be able to access more RAM at the same time, so latency will hopefully go down with the next generation of desktop memory.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now