Sequential Read Performance

Our first test of sequential read performance uses short bursts of 128MB, issued as 128kB operations with no queuing. The test averages performance across eight bursts for a total of 1GB of data transferred from a drive containing 16GB of data. Between each burst the drive is given enough idle time to keep the overall duty cycle at 20%.

Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)

The burst sequential read performance of the Team Delta RGB is slower than most other SATA drives, but this is another test where the overall spread of scores is quite narrow so a second to last place result isn't really much of a problem. The entry-level NVMe MyDigitalSSD SBX is about 50% faster than the Delta RGB while the high-end ADATA SX8200 is more than five times faster.

Our test of sustained sequential reads uses queue depths from 1 to 32, with the performance and power scores computed as the average of QD1, QD2 and QD4. Each queue depth is tested for up to one minute or 32GB transferred, from a drive containing 64GB of data. This test is run twice: once with the drive prepared by sequentially writing the test data, and again after the random write test has mixed things up, causing fragmentation inside the SSD that isn't visible to the OS. These two scores represent the two extremes of how the drive would perform under real-world usage, where wear leveling and modifications to some existing data will create some internal fragmentation that degrades performance, but usually not to the extent shown here.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Read

On the longer sequential read test, the Delta RGB performs fine reading back data that was written sequentially, but it and several other drives using Micron 32L NAND have particularly poor performance when reading data that was written randomly (and thus is not contiguous on the flash itself). Making a full disk backup image of a well-used Delta RGB could be quite a bit slower than expected, but this weakness shouldn't be a huge problem for the gaming PC usage this drive is intended for.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s/W Average Power in W

The power usage of the Delta RGB during sequential reads is fairly low, so its efficiency score when reading contiguous data is good. The DRAMless SSDs have a natural advantage in low power consumption and their sequential read performance is adequate to put them near the top of the efficiency rankings.

The Delta RGB provides near-identical sequential read performance to the very similar ADATA SU800 and HP S700 Pro, but the Delta RGB clearly uses less power (not counting the LEDs). Performance increases slightly from QD1 to QD2 and is steady through the rest of the test, as it is for most SATA drives.

Sequential Write Performance

Our test of sequential write burst performance is structured identically to the sequential read burst performance test save for the direction of the data transfer. Each burst writes 128MB as 128kB operations issued at QD1, for a total of 1GB of data written to a drive containing 16GB of data.

Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)

The burst sequential write speed of the Delta RGB matches the other two drives with the same controller and NAND combination. Nothing really quite saturates the SATA link at QD1, but the Delta RGB is plenty fast.

Our test of sustained sequential writes is structured identically to our sustained sequential read test, save for the direction of the data transfers. Queue depths range from 1 to 32 and each queue depth is tested for up to one minute or 32GB, followed by up to one minute of idle time for the drive to cool off and perform garbage collection. The test is confined to a 64GB span of the drive.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write

On the longer sequential write test, the Delta RGB is slightly faster than the similar ADATA SU800 and HP S700 Pro, resulting in one of the highest scores for this class of drive. It even slightly outperforms the larger 500GB-class SATA drives and is significantly faster than the entry-level NVMe MyDigitalSSD SBX.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s/W Average Power in W

The DRAMless HP S700 has the clear lead for power efficiency among this class of drives, but the Delta RGB comes in second place and is the lowest-power drive in this class that has a DRAM cache.

The Delta RGB has no trouble saturating the SATA link at QD2 and sustains that performance through the rest of the test, with no sign of the SLC write cache filling up.

Random Performance Mixed Read/Write Performance
Comments Locked

14 Comments

View All Comments

  • rrinker - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 - link

    Well, at least the LEDs don't kill the performance, so I guess that's a positive, at least compared to the HyperX. Now they just wreck the price/performance ratio. Again, I must just be an old fogey because I'd much rather chose the best performing piece of hardware at a given price point, instead of the fanciest looking. Should they correspond (not likely) then I guess I'd get the one with all the fancy lights and just not hook them up.
  • khanikun - Thursday, September 27, 2018 - link

    I think the problem is, is that it's more likely that they will eventually correspond. Not due to the price or anything being cheaper to produce, they just stop making the non-RGB version, cause higher profit margin.

    They'll make the best performance item, lace it with RGBs, call it Gamer something, then charge a higher price. Then they make lower performance/lower feature versions. I'm already seeing that with motherboards. My last mobo was a Gigabyte and to get the chipset and features I wanted, it ended up being an RGB mobo. My new Gigabyte mobo, same thing, but no RGBs in the mobo, just RGB headers.
  • xrror - Wednesday, September 26, 2018 - link

    What would be fun is if Team Group sold just the shells and RGB LED part of this, and you put your own SSD inside it =)
  • DyneCorp - Thursday, April 25, 2019 - link

    Thanks for the review, Billy. Why do you think the Delta SSD has a quarter of the endurance of the SU800? Smaller SLC cache buffer? ADATAs more strenuous NAND binning process?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now