CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC for the supported frequency of the processor for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

The ASRock Z370 Gaming-ITX/ac completed our Blender testing in 310 seconds placing it on the bell curve but on the trailing edge. Nothing anomalous here. 

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

POV-Ray results show the Gaming-ITX/ac in the middle of this thread heavy benchmark. All boards ran the benchmark at the same clock speed of 4.3 GHz. This particular group of results continues with its very tight set of results with less than 1% difference (margin of error). 

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

Moving on to WinRAR, the ASRock board completed this in 41.3 seconds landing it in the middle of our results. We can see the B360 and H370 boards at the bottom of the pack due to its lack of MCE while the other boards tested boost to the same value. 

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

Our 7Zip results are pretty interesting with the ASRock Z370 Gaming ITX/ac leading an otherwise tightly packed group by a fair amount (over 2K points). In this test, the board boosted all cores to 4.7 GHz to achieve this result whereas others used a less aggressive Multi-Core Enhancement by default. 

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

In 3DPM 2.1, we are seeing the same type of behavior here in the Gaming ITX/ac leading the pack by over 100 points. Here again, this board has more aggressive MCE in this test also running it at 4.7 GHz all cores. 

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

The DigiCortex results have the Z370 Gaming-ITX with a result of 0.98. Nothing of note with that result. DigiCortex does show a decent spread between results which is different than we have seen previously with 6% separating the best from worst. 

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

33 Comments

View All Comments

  • hansmuff - Saturday, July 14, 2018 - link

    Could you please tell me which program you use to check DPC latency? Thank you kindly!
  • Joe Shields - Monday, July 16, 2018 - link

    LatencyMon - http://www.resplendence.com/latencymon
  • Vanguarde - Saturday, July 14, 2018 - link

    If this is typical ASrock quality, the board will fail twice in one year like my previous board did, with a nightmare RMA process.

    Will never do business with ASrock again. Sticking with the adults at Asus.
  • dubyadubya - Saturday, July 14, 2018 - link

    Must have been a fluke. My Z97 Extreme 6 is over 4 years old and is still rock solid. I have built 3 or 4 systems using Z97 Extreme 4's for friends, all still running never a problem. I had a Asrock micro ATX board I gave to a friend years ago, can't remember the model (Intel Core 2 vintage) that's still running to this day. Knock on wood. So you were just unlucky IMHO.
  • Holliday75 - Monday, July 16, 2018 - link

    One board does not represent an entire company. One RMA process issue does not as well.

    No company in the history of companies has had a 100% production rate. When doing large end user deployments in the past we considered anything with a DOA rate under 3% to be wonderful. That's 3 dead laptops, desktops, etc per 100. Worst one was Toshiba with a DOA rate of 8% on a 1000 laptop deployment. Ew. Anyway you have to step back and look at it from a much wider angle.

    ASRock has been solid for me over the years. I have no complaints. Rocking a 5 year old rig with one right now and know plenty of people who have had no issues. I know they are not perfect.....nobody is.
  • gehex1 - Saturday, July 14, 2018 - link

    for all your cooperate espionage and monitoring, locate dating scams and do deep background check. d a r k w e b s o l u t i o n s . co
  • deepRED.tv - Sunday, July 15, 2018 - link

    Ok, almost perfect. Now a mini itx threadripper board with thunderbolt.

    Only, when hell frezes over right?
  • mkaibear - Monday, July 16, 2018 - link

    Are you mad, man???

    Threadripper is an *enormous* socket;

    http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/asrock-x399m-taic...

    That's it on a mATX board...

    To get x299 on a mini itx board and keep the quad channel RAM they had to shift to SODIMMs, unless you're putting the RAM on the backside of the board I can't see how they could do a quad channel TR board..

    Just stick with microATX and add TB via a PCIe card!
  • f18ccx - Monday, July 16, 2018 - link

    I have this board, everything about it is excellent except the 1.5v DDR voltage limit. My B-Die G.Skill 3200 Mhz RAM has a lot more in it than 3866/CL15. If you reading, ASRock, please give us more to play with.
  • Dug - Friday, July 27, 2018 - link

    Why is Non-UEFI POST Time used?
    Is there a way to find out fastest boot time?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now