Camera - Low Light Evaluation

Low-light photography is one area the where the P20 Pro and P20 promised to bring great improvements. On the P20 Pro this is largely achieved through the ability of the sensor to do pixel binning and thus combine 2x2, meaning four, physical pixels into a single logical pixel. In theory this improves light sensitivity of the sensor by 4x and equivalent to a sensor with 2µm pixel pitches, which would make it by far the most sensitive sensor in smartphones.

Another feature to complement the improved low light capture and processing abilities of the P20s is a much improved “Night” mode. This was a feature which was present in Huawei cameras for some time now, essentially it is a multi-frame long-exposure capture mode that does computational combination of the shots into a single resulting high exposure shot. The difference with the P20 versus past implementations is the fact that the algorithm has now substantially improved shake compensation, meaning it’s now actually usable in handheld mode without a tripod and it will still come out sharp.

Click for full image

[ P20 Pro ] - [ P20 ] - [ P10 ]
[ Galaxy S9+ ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Mi MIX 2S ] - [ Pixel 2 XL ]

Starting off with the first scene after sundown, we see that the P20 Pro’s 40MP shooting mode becomes very uncompetitive in low light due to its 1µm pixel pitch, and although both shots opt for the same exposure time and ISO, the 40MP clearly suffers from blurriness and lack of detail.

The P20 Pro’s 10MP shot is able to offer much better dynamic range and thus also better contrast than the Galaxy S9 or for that matter any of the other comparison devices. The P20 also does extremely well in terms of exposure, coming very similar to the P20 Pro, but having a noticeable disadvantage in terms of detail retention.

Click for full image

[ P20 Pro ] - [ P20 ] - [ P10 ] - [ Mate 10 Pro ]
[ Galaxy S9+ ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Mi MIX 2S ] - [ Pixel 2 XL ]

In this shot the P20’s were the only phones to have sufficient dynamic range to now blow out too much of the blue street crossing sign as well as the left message board. The P20 again posts very similar exposure as the P20 Pro – but lagging behind in terms of overall detail. While the P20’s won in dynamic range, they lose out in terms of detail retention against the competition. Unfortunately all of my S9 shots ended up out of focus for some reason so that shot should only be used as a comparison in terms of exposure.

Click for full image

[ P20 Pro ] - [ P20 ] - [ P10 ] - [ Mate 10 Pro ]
[ Galaxy S9+ ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Mi MIX 2S ] - [ Pixel 2 XL ]

In this scene, the P20 Pro outright flexes its muscles as it’s able to be the uncontested winner in terms of dynamic range, exposure, colour balance and detail retention by a large margin over all other phones. The P20 follows the P20 Pro in terms of exposure, but its detail retention is no better than competing smartphones.

Extreme low light photography

Generally for the P20 Pro, the less light there is, the better it will perform when compared to the competition. So stark is the difference in light capture capability, that generally there’s very little the other phones can do. I decided to have a little fun and throw the phones into what is essentially impossible scenarios where you wouldn’t expect a normal camera, yet alone a smartphone to perform.

Click for full image

[ P20 Pro ] - [ P20 ]
[ P10 ] - [ Mate 10 Pro ]
[ Galaxy S9+ ] - [ iPhone X ] - [ Mi MIX 2S ] - [ Pixel 2 XL ]

In this first scene there’s little to talk about existing phones as they mostly aren’t able to capture much at all besides some bushes around the light post. The P20 and P20 Pro on the other hand are able to resolve enough that we can actually make out what’s in the scene. The night mode on both phones demonstrate just what is possible in terms computational photography and the results are impressive.

On the P20 Pro in particular is particularly able to resolve a stupid amount of detail while this effectively was a 6 second handheld exposure.

But the real impressive shot is actually the regular 10MP mode – the camera here kicked in into high ISO mode and the resulting shot is a 1/4th second exposure at ISO51200, essentially a first in a smartphone.

Click for full image

[ P20 Pro ] - [ P20 ]
[ P10 ] - [ Mate 10 Pro ]
[ Galaxy S9+ ] - [ iPhone X ]

The second extreme low light scene has just a little more light as it’s being faintly illuminated by the dim walkway light. Again the P20 Pro’s 10MP mode shot results in a 1/4th second exposure at ISO51200 and the result is just astounding, and pardon the pun, simply night and day when compared to other phones. Even though the P20 doesn’t have any special light capture hardware, in Night mode it still manages to vastly outperform the competition. Funnily enough, the Mate 10 performs really well in terms of exposure in its Night mode here, but as it lacks the shake compensation feature of the P20’s, the resulting image is quite a blurry mess, and why that mode was generally unusable in the past unless you put the phone on a tripod or fixture.

Generally the P20 and P20 Pro impressed in low-light capture. The P20 doesn’t have any special hardware so most of its quality improvement are solely due to software processing improvements. Night mode in particular as a concept isn’t anything that’s bound to any hardware configuration so it’s fantastic to see Huawei push innovation and evolving it into something really special.

In terms of actual light capture, the P20 Pro’s massive sensor is just without competition. Both the hardware and the software processing make this easily the most competitive smartphone in low-light scenarios. At high ISO settings, we’re seeing astounding and never-before-seen results from a smartphone that really pushes the envelope of what can be done in a mobile device.

Camera - Daylight Evaluation Camera Video Recording
Comments Locked

81 Comments

View All Comments

  • Vishnu NS - Friday, June 15, 2018 - link

    Andrei - I have the Mate 9 and I get regular monthly security updates. I just got my June 2018 update yesterday. Cheers! Love the review, strongly eyeing the Mate 10 Pro at $549 on Amazon currently. Also awaiting the Pixel 3 XL release later this year before making a new purchase.

    Regards,
    Vish
  • chocolatine - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link

    My P10+ (in France) has the may 2018 security patches (and Android 8). Using the HiSuite software updater while your phone is plugged in your computer works much better than using the system update menu of the phone
  • amouses - Friday, June 15, 2018 - link

    The Mate10 is supported by Project Treble. And so swifter updates are possible. But so such assurance has been given for any P20 variant. I've repeatedly asked Huawei via official and unofficial forums. You will also notice that Huawei was absent from the Android P Beta programme. Not a good sign.
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, June 15, 2018 - link

    Thanks Andrei! While some other commentators here seem to have had luck getting updates for their Huawei phones, my experience mirrors yours - spotty or no updates. Would love to hear that they are fully committed to timely updates and longer-term support for their phones.
  • sonicmerlin - Sunday, June 17, 2018 - link

    Don't these come with Project Treble? Shouldn't that make updating far easier?
  • mmrezaie - Sunday, June 17, 2018 - link

    It doesn't on my Motorola! It is still on Android 8.0 and security update from Feb. I think I have got only three updates since it got introduced as one of the first Project Terrible phones. Pun intended.
  • Round - Tuesday, June 26, 2018 - link

    I'm sure Huawei will release updates as soon as they get an approved version from the communist government or the PLA, that has improved tracking apps built in at the OS level. You can trust these guys, along with their friends at ZTE, another stalwart of honesty and integrity.
  • Lodix - Friday, June 15, 2018 - link

    Nice review.

    I noticed the Xiaomi Mi Mix2s has the same problems in terms of GPU throttling as the S9+. Do you know what is causing this behaviour?
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Friday, June 15, 2018 - link

    It's just the behaviour of S845 devices it seems - the MIX 2S review will be a separate piece after this.
  • ZolaIII - Friday, June 15, 2018 - link

    Probably the step into right direction. Xiaomi uses CAF defaults this day's & yes they are very aggressive.
    To answer the question;
    The A75's are about 50% larger more power hungry compared to the A73's both SoC's are made on the 10 nm Samsung FinFET while later one (S845) is made on more optimised one which is let's say capable of saving around 20% power compared to the early one. The S845 is also clocked hire and all do it's only 12~13% those eat additional 25~30% more power. The all FinFET structures leak insanely when the around 2.1~2.2GHz limit is crossed so more than that should be used for short bursts and only when really needed. In the end we have 1.5~1.6x CPU power consumption while sustainable power limit remains the same 2.5~2.7W. This is enough to diminish the A630 efficiency/performance/proces advantages of around 30% combined. Their is no hotpluging in user space whatsoever on any newer Snapdragon SoC's/builds (since removing the Core_ctl a year ago) which can help a lot regarding sustainable GPU performance. At the end it's at least easy to play with Kirin regarding limiting the CPU frequency scheduling as it uses good old interactive governor & I am certain it will be very beneficial regarding GPU through.

    Best regards.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now