Civilization 6

First up in our CPU gaming tests is Civilization 6. Originally penned by Sid Meier and his team, the Civ series of turn-based strategy games are a cult classic, and many an excuse for an all-nighter trying to get Gandhi to declare war on you due to an integer overflow. Truth be told I never actually played the first version, but every edition from the second to the sixth, including the fourth as voiced by the late Leonard Nimoy, it a game that is easy to pick up, but hard to master.

Benchmarking Civilization has always been somewhat of an oxymoron – for a turn based strategy game, the frame rate is not necessarily the important thing here and even in the right mood, something as low as 5 frames per second can be enough. With Civilization 6 however, Firaxis went hardcore on visual fidelity, trying to pull you into the game. As a result, Civilization can taxing on graphics and CPUs as we crank up the details, especially in DirectX 12.

Perhaps a more poignant benchmark would be during the late game, when in the older versions of Civilization it could take 20 minutes to cycle around the AI players before the human regained control. The new version of Civilization has an integrated ‘AI Benchmark’, although it is not currently part of our benchmark portfolio yet, due to technical reasons which we are trying to solve. Instead, we run the graphics test, which provides an example of a mid-game setup at our settings.

At both 1920x1080 and 4K resolutions, we run the same settings. Civilization 6 has sliders for MSAA, Performance Impact and Memory Impact. The latter two refer to detail and texture size respectively, and are rated between 0 (lowest) to 5 (extreme). We run our Civ6 benchmark in position four for performance (ultra) and 0 on memory, with MSAA set to 2x.

For reviews where we include 8K and 16K benchmarks (Civ6 allows us to benchmark extreme resolutions on any monitor) on our GTX 1080, we run the 8K tests similar to the 4K tests, but the 16K tests are set to the lowest option for Performance.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

8K

16K

Benchmarking Performance: CPU Legacy Tests Gaming Performance: Shadow of Mordor
Comments Locked

545 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gothmoth - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    what´s up with this THANK YOU advertising in articles now?

    one page of "we must thank" BS.....
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, April 21, 2018 - link

    Never kick your creditor in the nuts. :)
  • Lolimaster - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    Unkermit the Ryzen, ya gaming king.
  • msroadkill612 - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    One thing that stands out, is how manifestly uncompetitive the intel 6700k & 7700K are at their absurd prices.
  • ACE76 - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    Dead platforms that sucked money out of customer pockets as well.
  • Luckz - Monday, April 23, 2018 - link

    The 8350K isn't that expensive. Same thing.
  • kill3x - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    Sorry, but these gaming results are total crap. I have 110 average fps on OC'ed 1600X 4.0GHz and GTX 980TI 1600 MHz in RotTR on high, and you show less FPS for 1080? Not to mention I have a crapload of processes running simultaneously. This is the hardest fail I've ever read.
  • realistz - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    Anandtech needs to redo the gaming test. It’s blatantly a false representation. And Meltdown doesn’t impact gaming. No excuse what so ever if they want to still be considered a reliable reviewer.
  • kill3x - Thursday, April 19, 2018 - link

    True. From the list of games I have in library, no results match with these. Or I can claim that OCed 980 Ti beats 1080 by a large margin.
  • Kankipappa - Friday, April 20, 2018 - link

    Well, you should claim. AFAIK it already matched 1080's performance on 1500 clocks and just going above that should make it faster.

    Just because reviewers benchmarked (And still use those results) the numbers on original 980 TI's that don't even hit the 1300mhz clocks on stock (what the aftermarket ones do), doesn't make the later non reference 980 TI's slower in reality. Many people think that 1070 matches the speed of OC'd 980Ti but in reality the old one is better - just more powerhungry. But hey, nvidia couldn't have sold those 1070's if all the people would know the truth. :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now