The Intel Optane SSD 900P 280GB Review
by Billy Tallis on October 27, 2017 9:30 AM ESTAnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer
The Destroyer is an extremely long test replicating the access patterns of very IO-intensive desktop usage. A detailed breakdown can be found in this article. Like real-world usage, the drives do get the occasional break that allows for some background garbage collection and flushing caches, but those idle times are limited to 25ms so that it doesn't take all week to run the test. These AnandTech Storage Bench (ATSB) tests do not involve running the actual applications that generated the workloads, so the scores are relatively insensitive to changes in CPU performance and RAM from our new testbed, but the jump to a newer version of Windows and the newer storage drivers can have an impact.
We quantify performance on this test by reporting the drive's average data throughput, the average latency of the I/O operations, and the total energy used by the drive over the course of the test.
The Intel Optane SSD 900P sets a new record for average data rate on The Destroyer, beating the Samsung 960 PRO 2TB's score by about 10%, and beating the more similarly-priced 512GB 960 PRO by about 23%.
The average latency of the Optane SSD 900P on The Destroyer is a modest improvement over the previous record. The 99th percentile latency is a more significant 60% reduction over the previous record, putting the Optane SSD more clearly in a separate performance consistency class from high-end flash-based SSDs.
The average read latency of the Optane SSD 900P on The Destroyer is less than half that of any flash-based SSD, but the average write latency is a bit slower than the fastest flash-based SSDs.
Even though the Optane SSD didn't set a record for average write latency on the Destroyer, its 99th percentile write latency is about half the previous record. The 99th percentile read latency beats the previous record by more than 60%.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
205 Comments
View All Comments
Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Optane seems like a Joke not only in endurance, performance, but not power consumption too. Right now it's basically a bot for random 4K, you don't really need that, get the 960EVO/PRO.Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
*now.AnnonymousCoward - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Why are you saying get the 960 PRO? It costs double a normal SSD and performs the same in real-world. Please enlighten me.SunnyNW - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Would system start-up be any faster?Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Probably yes since it has higher random 4k read and latency. Wanna check the limit, search those old ramdisk booting times. Above that we would need a boot disk of L3 cache memory class, then one made up of L2 cache memory class, edram, etc.Lolimaster - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Till you reach L1 cache memory class or sram."Bullwinkle J Moose" - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
That depends....How fast is Fast?
I've seen people bragging on youtube that their new 90+ Watt Quadcore Intel CPU will boot Win 10 to an M.2 EVO drive in 17-20 seconds....
But my 35 Watt dualcore Sandy bridge will boot Windows 10 Fall Crappers Edition (Sept 2017) to an 850 Pro in 5.35 seconds.....
or, the same machine will boot Windows XP-SP2 to the same 850 Pro in 3 - 4 seconds (Varies sleightly every boot)
So, how fast is fast?
jabber - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Good luck to the couple of dozen or so that will be able to make proper use of this and notice a difference over a 850 EVO .Pork@III - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
Do fast? Yes it is fast. Has volume? - Nope.I maked install of operation system and come to install FM7 on 128GB SSD and instalator say me: "not enough space". :(
nOOky - Saturday, October 28, 2017 - link
The 280 gig drive is priced similarly to the Samsung 830 Pro 256 gig when it came out if you're thinking the price is outrageous...