ASRock Z270 Supercarrier Board Features

A quick look at ASRock’s website easily reveals that they intended the Z270 Supercarrier to be for professional designers and content editors. That, however, is a very narrow segment of the market, so the company’s engineers tried to add features that would also entice gamers and enthusiasts with larger budgets. The main highlight of the Z270 Supercarrier is the presence of four PCIe ×8 slots that allow for triple and quad SLI configurations, for either productivity or gaming. Other than that, ASRock has also added a very powerful CPU circuitry and advanced controllers that would appeal to gamers, as well as extensive storage device support that is needed by professionals. Despite the sheer number of features and supported devices, the dimensions of the Z270 Supercarrier are those of a standard ATX motherboard, ensuring compatibility with a far greater number of PC cases over an E-ATX design.

ASRock Z270 Supercarrier
Warranty Period 3 Years
Product Page Link
Price Link
Size ATX
CPU Interface LGA1151
Chipset Intel Z270
Memory Slots (DDR4) Four DDR4
Supporting 64GB
Dual Channel
Up to DDR4-3733+
Memory Slots (DDR3L) None
Video Outputs HDMI 1.4a
DisplayPort 1.2
Network Connectivity AQC108 / Intel I219-V / Intel I211-AT
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC1220
PCIe Slots for Graphics (from CPU) 4 × PCIe 3.0 via PEX 8747
(×16/×16, ×16/×8/×8, ×8/×8/×8/×8)
PCIe Slots for Other (from PCH) 1 × PCIe ×1
Onboard SATA Six, RAID 0/1/5/10
Onboard SATA Express Two
Onboard M.2 3 × PCIe 3.0 (x4)
Onboard U.2 None
USB 3.1 Two Type-C (Intel JHL6540)
USB 3.0 4 x Type-A Rear Panel
4 × via headers
1 × Type-A onboard
USB 2.0 2 × Rear Panel
4 × via headers
Power Connectors 1 x 24-pin ATX
1 x 8-pin CPU
1 x 6-pin GPU
Fan Headers 1 x CPU (4-pin)
1 x Pump/Aux (4-pin)
3 x System (4-pin)
IO Panel 4 x USB 3.0 (USB 3.1 Gen 1)
2 x USB 2.0
2 x USB 3.1 Type-C/Thunderbolt 3
1 x CMOS Reset Button
3 x Network RJ-45
1 x DisplayPort 1.2
1 x HDMI 1.4a
1 x Combo PS/2
5 x 3.5 mm Audio Jacks
1 x Optical SPDIF Out Port
Other Features WiFi/BT Onboard
Supports Intel® Optane™ technology
Front Audio Header w/ TI NE5532 amplifier
COM port header
RGB lighting
Dual LAN with Teaming

In The Box

We get the following:

  • Driver Disk
  • Quick Installation Guide
  • Software Setup Guide
  • Rear I/O Shield
  • Four black SATA cables (two straight, two with a 90° connector)
  • SLI HB bridges (2-way, 3-way, and 4-way)
  • RGB strip cable
  • Wireless antennas
  • Case badge

The items bundled alongside with the Z270 Supercarrier begin with a standard manual, a drivers/software DVD, a metallic I/O shield, a case badge, and four SATA cables; ordinary items that can be found accompanying almost any motherboard. However, we also find an extra cable for external RGB strips, two wireless antennas, and three HB SLI bridges. The HB SLI bridges are specially designed so as to support the NVIDIA GTX 1080 GPUs. However, we found the inclusion of typical antennas strange, as they often are the cause of space issues behind a case. A single wired antenna such as the one ASRock supplies with the Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac would have been much more convenient.

ASRock Z270 Supercarrier Overclocking

Experience with ASRock Z270 Supercarrier

Although the main target group of the Z270 Supercarrier are professionals, most of which are unlikely to do any overclocking at all, ASRock included a wealth of overclocking options and advanced circuitry to support it. This was probably an effort to make the Z270 Supercarrier a competitive option for enthusiastic gamers with large budgets. No matter the reason, the Z270 Supercarrier does have both the hardware and the software to support extensive overclocking. The power circuitry is excellent and the BIOS is very flexible, with the voltage and frequency options having excellent range and step.

Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Overclock Results

At this point we should again mention that the ASRock Z270 Supercarrier has multi-core turbo enabled by default, which is common, but also has a default turbo multiplier of ×45 rather than ×44, essentially overclocking our 7700K CPU to 4.5 GHz by default.

Testing the automated overclock options proved that ASRock’s overclocking presets will work fine for users that do not want to concern themselves with detailed settings. The automated setting however are, as expected, a little too generous with the voltage. Our system was working fine with the Turbo CPU setting up to 4.8 GHz but any further than that would raise our processor’s temperatures too high and trigger thermal throttling. Better cooling solutions and a lucky CPU pick can yield much better overclocking results if done manually. Manual control allowed us to reach a fully stable overclock of 5.0 GHz. Ultimately, what limited us was the thermal performance of our CPU and not the motherboard.

The ASRock Z270 Supercarrier also handles high BCLK frequencies very well. We managed to reach a fully stable frequency of 193 MHz with virtually minimal tweaking. Note that the newer motherboard designs decouple the CPU bus from the rest of the frequency domains in order to allow for these high BCLK overclocks, meaning that the performance of other components and the system’s overall bandwidth remains unaffected. On the contrary, frequency misalignments can cause an overall performance drop. Thus, this technique is useless to users who have unlocked CPUs and should be used only to overclock locked CPUs.

Visual Inspection Test Bed and Setup
Comments Locked

50 Comments

View All Comments

  • wiyosaya - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    I am confused! 4-way SLI? Am I living in a time bubble or something? I thought that nVidia announced some time ago that they were focusing on 2-way SLI due to scaling issues and that support for 4-way SLI would be minimal in the future.

    Besides, with 4-lane pci-e on this thingy, if anyone really wanted to do 4-way SLI, it seems like Threadripper (or sIntel's equivalent enthusiast parts) would be a much better platform for 4-way SLI.

    Maybe ASRock is just trying to prolong the wave artificially.
  • MadAd - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    there are other niche uses for 4 way, a hobbyist mining rig, a small render farm for blender, or the well off who just want to throw money at making a stonking pc
  • BrokenCrayons - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    Typical GPU mining on a large scale can work with a 1x PCIe slot so four 16x slots aren't really of any added value for that sort of situation.
  • Notmyusualid - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    4x SLI on Pascal works. I have 4x 1070 FTWs in my main rig. Search it out on a well-known video site.

    Due to installed PCIe switches, all four of my GPUs 'see' a x16 3.0 slot each, but they are multiplexed together to share 40 available lanes from the CPU, and this seems more than plenty, so I shake my head to comments fighting over how many lanes you have over this amount, because this works just fine. *Maybe* 28 would be too few, but 40 is just fine. Depends on what you are doing I suppose.

    I won't be buying Threadripper due to what I see as confusion over different modes of operation, and possible latency issues (depending on application), and the multiple internal dies. Back in the day, it amused me to see people poking fun at the 'Core 2 Quads' for not being 'real' quad cores, but nobody I have seen has mentioned that TR is not just two - but FOUR separate dies on the same package, whilst the competition - Intel, has all its cores on a single die / package this time around (as far as I know).

    I'm slightly impressed with TR, but not enough to buy it, given I already have 14c/28t Xeon.
  • supdawgwtfd - Sunday, October 1, 2017 - link

    TR is 2 dies.

    The other 2 dies are just there to help support the IHS.

    Perhaps if you weren't completely ignorant you would know this. And saying TR is confusing compared to Intel is a laugh.

    Had a look at Intel's X299 line up at all?

    Noticed that they have many different CPUs all with different pcie lanes?

    Now THAT is confusing.
  • Notmyusualid - Sunday, October 8, 2017 - link

    Well stone me. 2 / 4 dies? It still leaves the opportunity for increased latency, as some sites have mentioned. So my comment stands.

    But yes, recent Intel confusion with socket / chipset compatibility leaves much to be desired. No way I'm going to defend that. But you'll know when you build your Intel rig, core-core latencies will be lower.
  • rocky12345 - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    Great review as always thanks.

    It seems weird that the MB makers are releasing so many z270 boards when it is basically at the end of life even before a year is up from when it was released. I guess Intel caught the MB makers off guard here as well and they are stumbling fast to get these boards out ASAP because of the R&D it cost to design them.
  • timecop1818 - Saturday, September 30, 2017 - link

    This board was released months ago (like April 2017 or earlier), they just got around to reviewing it
  • rpjkw11 - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    I really like the three M.2 connectors. I have no need, yet, for U.2, but I long ago ditched HDDs and now run two SSDs.
  • rsandru - Friday, September 29, 2017 - link

    The NE5532 is an op-amp and not a headset amplifier.

    It's been first released in 1985 and has been found in all kinds of electronics since then because it's cheap. I'm struggling to find a reason why it's mentioned as some sort of feature...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now