Rise of the Tomb Raider

One of the newest games in the gaming benchmark suite is Rise of the Tomb Raider (RoTR), developed by Crystal Dynamics, and the sequel to the popular Tomb Raider which was loved for its automated benchmark mode. But don’t let that fool you: the benchmark mode in RoTR is very much different this time around.

Visually, the previous Tomb Raider pushed realism to the limits with features such as TressFX, and the new RoTR goes one stage further when it comes to graphics fidelity. This leads to an interesting set of requirements in hardware: some sections of the game are typically GPU limited, whereas others with a lot of long-range physics can be CPU limited, depending on how the driver can translate the DirectX 12 workload.

Where the old game had one benchmark scene, the new game has three different scenes with different requirements. These are three scenes designed to be taken from the game, but it has been noted that scenes like 2-Prophet shown in the benchmark can be the most CPU limited elements of that entire level, and the scene shown is only a small portion of that level. Because of this, we report the results for each scene on each graphics card separately.

Graphics options for RoTR are similar to other games in this type, offering some presets or allowing the user to configure texture quality, anisotropic filter levels, shadow quality, soft shadows, occlusion, depth of field, tessellation, reflections, foliage, bloom, and features like PureHair which updates on TressFX in the previous game.

Again, we test at 1920x1080 and 4K using our native 4K displays. At 1080p we run the High preset, while at 4K we use the Medium preset which still takes a sizable hit in frame rate.

It is worth noting that RoTR is a little different to our other benchmarks in that it keeps its graphics settings in the registry rather than a standard ini file, and unlike the previous TR game the benchmark cannot be called from the command-line. Nonetheless we scripted around these issues to automate the benchmark four times and parse the results. From the frame time data, we report the averages, 99th percentiles, and our time under analysis.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

#1 Geothermal Valley Spine of the Mountain

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

 

#2 Prophet’s Tomb

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

 

#3 Spine of the Mountain GeoThermal Valley

MSI GTX 1080 Gaming 8G Performance


1080p

4K

The 8700K did not seem to play nicely with RoTR. We'll go back and check this.

CPU Gaming Performance: Shadow of Mordor CPU Gaming Performance: Grand Theft Auto
Comments Locked

222 Comments

View All Comments

  • mapesdhs - Monday, October 9, 2017 - link

    GN did a great video on this, it's certainly complicated.
  • crimson117 - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Will the included heatsink / cooler be viable on the i7-8700? Or would you still need to buy an aftermarket cooler?
  • AndrewJacksonZA - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Typo page 7 (Civ AI):
    "an asymptotic result wken you"
    "wken"
  • jimjamjamie - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    RIP hyperthreading for anything under $300...
  • Anonymous Blowhard - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Buy AMD.
  • mapesdhs - Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - link

    Or a used Intel, sooo much value. I'd been looking for a 4930K upgrade for an X79 system (over a 3930K), so as to provide proper PCIe 3.0, etc., main focus is animation, rendering and video processing; gave up, bought a 10-core (20 thread) XEON E5-2680 v2 instead for 165 UKP (very easy to find). It scores 15.44 for CB 11.5, and 1381 for CB R15 (these tests force an all-core Turbo of 3.1GHz), compare these to the 8700K numbers, not bad at all for a board as old as X79, and the temps/power/heat/etc. are excellent.
  • AndrewJacksonZA - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Thank you very much for your efforts, ladies and gentlemen, this was a really informative review and I enjoyed reading it. :-)
  • sonichedgehog360@yahoo.com - Thursday, October 5, 2017 - link

    Here is a more accurate TDP test:

    https://img.purch.com/image001-png/w/711/aHR0cDovL...
  • bongey - Friday, October 6, 2017 - link

    Quiet now, Anandtech only publishes what Intel tells them to publish.
  • Ian Cutress - Saturday, October 7, 2017 - link

    Last week I was being called an AMD shill. Before that, an Intel shill, Before that, an AMD shill. Swings, roundabouts, hedges.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now