System Performance

The Surface Pro has always provided good performance for the size of the device, and for the new Surface Pro, we see the step to the latest 7th generation Intel Core processors. The choices are the same as the outgoing Pro 4, but one generation newer. Even though the latest Kaby Lake chips utilize the same CPU architecture as Skylake, improvements to the 14 nm process, which Intel is calling 14nm+ allows for higher frequencies, and lower power consumption, so despite having the same architecture, there are gains to be had. Let’s take a look at the CPUs.

Surface Pro 4 CPU vs Surface Pro (2017) CPU
CPU Core m3 Core i5 Core i7
Surface Pro 4 Core m3-6Y30
2 core, 4 thread 900 MHz to 2.2 GHz
Core i5-6300U
2 core, 4 thread 2.4 GHz to 3.0 GHz
Core i7-6660U
2 core, 4 thread 2.4 GHz to 3.4 GHz
Surface Pro (2017) Core m3-7Y30
2 core, 4 thread 1.0 GHz to 2.6 GHz
Core i5-7300U
2 core, 4 thread 2.6 GHz to 3.5 GHz
Core i7-7660U
2 core, 4 thread 2.5 GHz to 4.0 GHz
Increase 100 MHz (base) 400 MHz (turbo) 200 MHz (base) 500 MHz (turbo) 100 MHz (base) 600 MHz (turbo)

You can see the base frequencies have all improved slightly, but the boost frequencies on all of the chips have increased significantly. This will allow quite a bit more responsiveness from the system, as well as overall higher performance if the device can keep the heat and power consumption in check for more sustained boosting.

Microsoft has provided the Core i7-7660U Surface Pro for review, with 16 GB of RAM and a 512 GB SSD. This adds another wrinkle over most other Ultrabooks in that it offers the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, compared to the HD 620 graphics in the i5 (and most other Ultrabooks) and the HD 615 graphics with the Core m3 model. The Iris Plus graphics configuration not only doubles the execution units available, from 24 to 48, but also includes 64 MB of eDRAM which can be used as a system cache as well as a graphics buffer. This provides yet another tier of memory before having to go to the (relatively) slow system memory, and depending on the application, can provide a real boost to performance.

Speaking of the integrated GPU, besides clockspeeds, this is the other area where the switch to Intel's Kaby Lake processors improves things for the Surface Pro. The GPU's media block received a significant overhaul, getting full hardware support for HEVC Main10 and the VP9 codec. The former is going to be popular with commercial streaming services over the long haul, and the latter is Google's codec of choice for YouTube, which immediately unlocks a good deal of power savings. Furthermore Kaby Lake is the first Intel processor family to get Netflix 4K support, offering a level of detail more befitting of the Surface Pro's higher resolution (though not quite 4K) display.

It's no surprise then that Microsoft has opted to keep the fan on the Core i7 model, since the extra graphics can quickly eat up the available TDP, but we did clarify with them that the Core i5 model is still running at the full 15-Watt TDP of the i5-7300U, and hasn't been intentionally set to a lower TDP via cTDP functionality. Hopefully we’ll have a chance to test that at a later date and see how the lack of active cooling impacts it.

Speaking of cooling, the Surface Pro now includes a slider if you click on the battery icon, which allows you to quickly and easily change the power mode. The choices are Best Battery Life, Better Performance, and Best Performance, with Best Battery Life as the default and recommended. Modern Standby devices have not allowed you to adjust the power settings very much before, so it’s nice to see some choices here now. Microsoft let us know that the slider settings adjust CPU efficiency and the PL1 / PL2 settings.  In “battery saver” the CPU and GPU are throttled with priority given to the GPU.  In “best performance” the CPU and GPU run at full power. This makes a big difference on noise levels, but also impacts performance, and we’ll dig into that when we look at the cooling later on. For the following scores, Best Performance was chosen for all of the graphs.

We’ve tested the Surface Pro with our standard laptop test suite, and comparisons will be among other similar devices. The Surface Pro 4 in the graph was the Core i5-6300U model, and since we didn’t get to test anything with Core i7-6660U, the Surface Book will be used as a comparison with the Core i7-6600U (although it did have external graphics as well). For other comparisons, there are some more Ultrabooks, and the Dell XPS 15 with quad-core 45-Watt Skylake to give a comparison against a larger device.

PCMark

PCMark 8 - Home

PCMark 8 - Creative

PCMark 8 - Work

PCMark has just launched an updated version of their all-in-one PC test, and once we have some more data from it, you should start to see it appear in our reviews. For now, since we have a lot of existing data on PCMark 8, we’ll showcase that. PCMark really tries to be a real-world test, with many different workloads that range from short, bursty tests, to longer sustained 3D gaming. As you can see, the Surface Pro is a significant step ahead of every other system here, with the combination of a higher frequency CPU, 64 MB of eDRAM, and double the execution units in the GPU of most other devices. Both Home and Creative see the largest gains, since they both have some gaming involved, but even the Work scores are a good step above the rest of the devices, including the quad-core Dell XPS 15.

Cinebench

Cinebench R15 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench is a rendering test, and we showcase the CPU scores only. It allows both single-threaded and multi-threaded versions of the test, and since it’s mostly CPU based, it’s a great display of the progress in CPU performance gains. You can see that the 15 W Core i7-7660U in the Surface Pro easily beats everything in the single-threaded version of this test, but the quad-core Dell XPS 15 unsurprisingly dominates on multi-threaded testing.

x264

x264 HD 5.x

x264 HD 5.x

Much like Cinebench, x264 is mostly a CPU test, and a video clip is converted on the CPU into h264. There is no single-threaded option though, so you can see the quad-core parts still offer a lot more grunt for these kinds of tasks, but compared to the other Ultrabooks, the Surface Pro is the fastest again.

Web Tests

Browsing performance is tough to capture well, mostly because the results are so heavily impacted by the browser. Browsers continue to improve on scripting performance, so over time, even the same system will improve somewhat. Still, it’s important to look at since so much of our time is spent on the web. Google Octane is now deprecated, and we’ll phase it out soon, but since we have a large sample of older devices tested, it’s still a good test to check out.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Google Octane 2.0

WebXPRT 2015

The combination of the latest Edge browser in the Creators Update version of Windows 10, with the speedy Core i7-7660U, put the Surface Pro pretty much at the top of all of these results.

System Performance Conclusion

The amount of performance that’s able to be packed inside of such a small device continues to impress, and for the first time, we’ve been able to check out the Core i7 model with Intel Iris graphics. Surface Pro can easily hold its own against any other Ultrabook, and often surpass it in performance. It would be great to see more vendors offering Intel's Iris graphics, since there are only a handful at the moment. But regardless, the move from Skylake to Kaby Lake has been a nice step forward, despite the CPU architecture remaining the same.

The Signature Type Cover and Surface Pen Graphics and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

124 Comments

View All Comments

  • ivan.lazarenko - Friday, June 16, 2017 - link

    Brett, thank you for the great review! This evolution approach for new Microsoft Surface Pro is a pretty lame version of what the fans were expecting to be a true successor, the real Surface Pro 5
    You might like this video hits like the last nail in the coffin and is funny: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3sC82vnR7A
  • UtilityMax - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    I have never been fan of a "laptop" that's as unstable on your laps as the Surface Pro 4, and a "tablet" that's as thick as heavy as the Surface Pro, and with such relatively poor touch GUI and the lack of much tablet apps. In other words, it was a poor laptop, and a poor tablet. The new one looks like more of the same. I'd rather by myself a Lenovo Yoga 700 or 900-series ultra-tin laptops foldable keyboard (yes, real keyboard, not keyboard "covers")
  • serendip - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    Unfortunately yes, most tablets make poor laptops. Large Windows tablets also make poor tablets because they're heavy and Windows still isn't touch friendly. I'm a masochist who loves traveling light so I don't mind rocking a cheap Teclast Windows tablet. I couldn't justify spending on a Surface when it costs so much and it doesn't know what it is.
  • damianrobertjones - Friday, August 18, 2017 - link

    Why does it have to be defined as either one?
  • mkozakewich - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    Okay, so there's never been anything more than rhetoric flying around about the pens. "Oh, it's so much better now!" It sounds good, but then I also hear people swear by the Apple Pencil. Is it possible to benchmark those kinds of things? Would it be possible for you to measure activation forces various pens, as well as maybe latency and pressure-levels-per-gram-of-force?

    Also, was the original Type Cover Alcantara? I haven't seen a word of it, but that material really surprised me when I first encountered it. It seems like it couldn't have been, because everyone is going gaga over this iteration.
  • Brett Howse - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    I haven't used the Apple Pencil for a while now, but it seems like both are pretty close in terms of usability. We can measure some of the things you mentioned, but not all, at least without new equipment which would have limited value outside of testing a stylus. But I don't have the Apple Pencil to compare it against anyway.

    The original Type Cover was not Alcantara, although they did release a Signature version with the synthetic fabric after the Surface Pro 4 launched.
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    About AnandTech
    A Message from Our Founder, Anand Shimpi
    We are motivated by one thing and one thing only: doing right by you.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AWESOME!
    Can you please investigate my claims that this Laptop is using a Gov't Sponsored Spyware Platform "OR" provide "ANY" EVIDENCE that these claims are incorrect without simply deleting my posts without explanation?
    I will gladly provide hundreds of examples of spyware/extortionware and malware if you like
    Can't wait for an HONEST review
    THANKS!
    Bullwinkle J Moose
  • mrbofus - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    "But it seems like wasted space to offer a mini DisplayPort connecter over a USB-C port which could easily handle DisplayPort duties (and so much more). But it seems like wasted space to offer a mini DisplayPort connecter over a USB-C port which could easily handle DisplayPort duties (and so much more). "

    It would also be nice if they got rid of the proprietary power connector and used USB-C. Two full USB-C ports and a USB-A port would have been a perfect port combination, in my opinion.
  • simard57 - Wednesday, June 21, 2017 - link

    as someone that trips over the power cable too often, I appreciate the magnetic connector.
    do agree with the comment regarding replacing Mini Display Port with USB-C but that would be dependent on cost impact.
  • Gunbuster - Saturday, June 17, 2017 - link

    Can you test Wi-Fi with Bluetooth in use? I'm wondering if they ever fixed the (extra) poor performance with it doing both...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now