GPU Performance

Section by Brandon Chester

The Pixel XL's Snapdragon 821 SoC uses the same Adreno 530 GPU that is used in Snapdragon 820. In the case of MSM8996 Pro AB, the max GPU frequency is set at 624MHz, which is also the same as Snapdragon 820. This means that at least on paper, one can expect the same GPU performance from the Pixel XL as existing Snapdragon 820 devices. Of course, there are always improvements to drivers and to the SoCs themselves as the manufacturing process matures, so there's always room for improvements in peak and sustained performance, but there won't be any major gains like what one would see from a completely new GPU or a bump in peak clock speed on the same part.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Overall

The Pixel XL performs similarly to existing Snapdragon 820 devices in 3DMark Sling Shot. All the devices from the past twelve months generally achieve the same overall score in this test, although when you look at the separate graphics and physics scores you'll see that some devices do better in each category than others. There's not much else to say here, as the Pixel XL isn't breaking any new ground, but it's also not behind the other Android flagship competition either.

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal (On Screen)

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal (Off Screen 1080p)

As expected, the performance of the Pixel XL in GFXBench's Manhattan test is in line with existing Snapdragon 820 devices. This year devices have really standardized on a resolution of 2560x1440 and Snapdragon 820, so the Pixel XL's performance in both tests is essentially identical to other phones such as the HTC 10 and the Galaxy S7. It's hard to overlook the fact that the Pixel XL's performance is competitive with smartphones that launched in the first quarter of the year, while the most recent smartphones like the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are over 30% faster in this test despite being the same price.

GFXBench Car Chase ES 3.1 / Metal (On Screen)

GFXBench Car Chase ES 3.1 / Metal (Off Screen 1080p)

In Car Chase the situation is essentially the same as Manhattan, with the Pixel XL performing similarly to existing Snapdragon 820 devices. In both cases the performance is actually a bit better, but not significantly so. The OnePlus 3 pulls ahead of the Pixel XL in the on screen test, which makes sense given that it's a 1080p device sitting among 1440p devices. Car Chase isn't available on iOS so there's no way to compare to Apple's A10, but among Android devices the Pixel XL does provide the best GPU performance available right now.

The Pixel XL's GPU performance is in line with the current flagship Android phones. Of course, it's already November, so it won't be too long before we see the next generation of phones arrive. Launching this late into the year means that performance isn't going to be significantly better than the initial wave of Snapdragon 820 devices that have been available since February or March, which does put the Pixel in a bit of an awkward position as far as price is concerned. You can grab a OnePlus 3 for $399 and it will perform equally as well in GPU-bound applications as the Pixel, or you can spend the same amount as the Pixel on an iPhone and GPU performance is significantly better. Whether or not this matters really depends on the customer, but it's something to consider when considering the balance of performance and features relative to the cost of a device.

System Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

250 Comments

View All Comments

  • CrazyElf - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link

    With a custom ROM based on AOSP or a derivative, that can be resolved.

    Alas, Samsung as of late has locked their phones and made them harder to break, so perhaps that advantage is now gone.
  • R. Hunt - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Overpriced Nexus would indeed describe this phone quite accurately. Maybe next time when Google has more time to take matters into their own hands and make it truly theirs it will bring something truly new to the table.
  • T1beriu - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    That's it??! Just a basic review with many missing segments that were included in previous standard Anandtech reviews, with no in-depth analysis, that was released 3 weeks after many tech publications released their reviews with the same amount of analysis and standards as yours?!

    Anandtech, something is very wrong with your "business plan". You guys don't offer a value proposition to your "products". Most of your reviews are just as standard as the other guys' but you release them much later. Either you decrease the number of reviews to focus on to just a few products with proper in-depth analysis or soon you will cease to exist (I would't be surprised if your traffic stats are just a small fraction of the one from 2 years ago). You have to make a drastic change soon. The only thing that brings me here is the nostalgia for high quality tech journalism and sadly I'm not seeing that anymore.

    I'm sure you have low resources, but please focus them for the highest impact.

    Good luck guys! I'm sure you can turn this around!
  • T1beriu - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Wow, this is extremely worrying and proves my fears.

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/anandtech.com
  • 10basetom - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    The chart shows rank, not hits.
  • jtang97 - Thursday, November 10, 2016 - link

    But shouldn't that be alarming in itself?

    I mean, in the space of a year, it dropped over a 1.5k positions in global ranking. And nearly 1k of that drop was in the past 3 months....
  • fanofanand - Tuesday, November 15, 2016 - link

    Might the drop have to do with all of the major releases that occurred a few short months ago? I mean talk about a crazy summer, it was GPU madness, new ARM architectures, speculation on ZEN, etc. I would imagine the web traffic would relatively closely follow the release cadence of new products. Now that doesn't mean Anandtech can't get better, but I don't believe that drop in ranking is a direct correlation to the concerns you presented.
  • hans_ober - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    +1
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    "Just a basic review with many missing segments that were included in previous standard Anandtech reviews"

    Just out of curiosity, what would you like to see that wasn't present? We've already done SD820 to death, for example.
  • munim - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link

    I was looking forward to wifi performance

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now