GPU Performance

Section by Brandon Chester

The Pixel XL's Snapdragon 821 SoC uses the same Adreno 530 GPU that is used in Snapdragon 820. In the case of MSM8996 Pro AB, the max GPU frequency is set at 624MHz, which is also the same as Snapdragon 820. This means that at least on paper, one can expect the same GPU performance from the Pixel XL as existing Snapdragon 820 devices. Of course, there are always improvements to drivers and to the SoCs themselves as the manufacturing process matures, so there's always room for improvements in peak and sustained performance, but there won't be any major gains like what one would see from a completely new GPU or a bump in peak clock speed on the same part.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Overall

The Pixel XL performs similarly to existing Snapdragon 820 devices in 3DMark Sling Shot. All the devices from the past twelve months generally achieve the same overall score in this test, although when you look at the separate graphics and physics scores you'll see that some devices do better in each category than others. There's not much else to say here, as the Pixel XL isn't breaking any new ground, but it's also not behind the other Android flagship competition either.

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal (On Screen)

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal (Off Screen 1080p)

As expected, the performance of the Pixel XL in GFXBench's Manhattan test is in line with existing Snapdragon 820 devices. This year devices have really standardized on a resolution of 2560x1440 and Snapdragon 820, so the Pixel XL's performance in both tests is essentially identical to other phones such as the HTC 10 and the Galaxy S7. It's hard to overlook the fact that the Pixel XL's performance is competitive with smartphones that launched in the first quarter of the year, while the most recent smartphones like the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are over 30% faster in this test despite being the same price.

GFXBench Car Chase ES 3.1 / Metal (On Screen)

GFXBench Car Chase ES 3.1 / Metal (Off Screen 1080p)

In Car Chase the situation is essentially the same as Manhattan, with the Pixel XL performing similarly to existing Snapdragon 820 devices. In both cases the performance is actually a bit better, but not significantly so. The OnePlus 3 pulls ahead of the Pixel XL in the on screen test, which makes sense given that it's a 1080p device sitting among 1440p devices. Car Chase isn't available on iOS so there's no way to compare to Apple's A10, but among Android devices the Pixel XL does provide the best GPU performance available right now.

The Pixel XL's GPU performance is in line with the current flagship Android phones. Of course, it's already November, so it won't be too long before we see the next generation of phones arrive. Launching this late into the year means that performance isn't going to be significantly better than the initial wave of Snapdragon 820 devices that have been available since February or March, which does put the Pixel in a bit of an awkward position as far as price is concerned. You can grab a OnePlus 3 for $399 and it will perform equally as well in GPU-bound applications as the Pixel, or you can spend the same amount as the Pixel on an iPhone and GPU performance is significantly better. Whether or not this matters really depends on the customer, but it's something to consider when considering the balance of performance and features relative to the cost of a device.

System Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

250 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jumangi - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    What a stupid post. Anandtech hasn't given you your wish fulfillment confirmation bias that you have the greatest phone ever made. This is a well done and thorough review.
  • Black Obsidian - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    As much as I consider Anandtech to be THE authoritative source for smartphone reviews, their conflicting reports on this review--both against other sources and even internally between review devices--are enough to bring the credibility of this specific review into question.
  • Matt Humrick - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Many of the other reviews focus on UI fluidity when discussing performance. There's actually many different facets to how a device performs. A phone like the Pixel XL, which is very fluid and responsive, can be slower than competing phones when performing other tasks that are not UI dependent.
  • realbabilu - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Dear Matt.
    Why I don't see the Discomark here, the way you can show the opening apps speed for QHD Android Pixel XL is slow comparing FHD like Oneplus 3. Are you waiting for FHD google pixel non XL test
  • Matt Humrick - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    DiscoMark does not work on Android 7 right now.
  • amdwilliam1985 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Nah, try to catch the trend.
    In Nexus/Pixel phone reviewers, the reviewer praises Samsung/HTC phones.
    In Samsung phone reviewers, the reviewer praises Nexus/Pixel phones.
    In HTC phone reviewers, the reviewer praises Samsung/Google phones.
    You will never be happy with your Android phone by reading Anandtech reviews, haha.

    IMHO, Pixel phones are like iPhone, boring, but does everything well enough, it's targeting the exact same market.
  • Meteor2 - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link

    They're in no way fashionable though, unlike the iPhone. People want to be 'seen' with iPhones; Google products, not so much. That was fine when Google were delivering high-value products (various Nexus devices) which value-conscious consumers bought; not so much with expensive-yet-flawed Pixel devices.
  • Tns123 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    They absolutely must have gotten a lemon or are missing objectivity. I and my wife have both the Pixel XL and regular version. Couldn't be happier. Phone is very fluid with no issues yet and not one reboot since received on October 20. Camera is phenomenal. Something is very amiss with this review.
  • Samus - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Yeah, this phone's price is a joke. Too many flaws to justify a flagship price like that.

    It's be a totally decent device for $300-$400. $649?

    Just get a OnePlus or something from Huawei for half the price with virtually the same spec sheet. All this phone does better than the competition is GPU performance.
  • amdwilliam1985 - Thursday, November 10, 2016 - link

    Anandtech review phones got LTE problem, looks like they got bad units.

    http://www.androidauthority.com/google-pixel-lte-b...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now