GPU Performance

Section by Brandon Chester

The Pixel XL's Snapdragon 821 SoC uses the same Adreno 530 GPU that is used in Snapdragon 820. In the case of MSM8996 Pro AB, the max GPU frequency is set at 624MHz, which is also the same as Snapdragon 820. This means that at least on paper, one can expect the same GPU performance from the Pixel XL as existing Snapdragon 820 devices. Of course, there are always improvements to drivers and to the SoCs themselves as the manufacturing process matures, so there's always room for improvements in peak and sustained performance, but there won't be any major gains like what one would see from a completely new GPU or a bump in peak clock speed on the same part.

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Physics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark Sling Shot 3.1 Extreme Unlimited - Overall

The Pixel XL performs similarly to existing Snapdragon 820 devices in 3DMark Sling Shot. All the devices from the past twelve months generally achieve the same overall score in this test, although when you look at the separate graphics and physics scores you'll see that some devices do better in each category than others. There's not much else to say here, as the Pixel XL isn't breaking any new ground, but it's also not behind the other Android flagship competition either.

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal (On Screen)

GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 / Metal (Off Screen 1080p)

As expected, the performance of the Pixel XL in GFXBench's Manhattan test is in line with existing Snapdragon 820 devices. This year devices have really standardized on a resolution of 2560x1440 and Snapdragon 820, so the Pixel XL's performance in both tests is essentially identical to other phones such as the HTC 10 and the Galaxy S7. It's hard to overlook the fact that the Pixel XL's performance is competitive with smartphones that launched in the first quarter of the year, while the most recent smartphones like the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are over 30% faster in this test despite being the same price.

GFXBench Car Chase ES 3.1 / Metal (On Screen)

GFXBench Car Chase ES 3.1 / Metal (Off Screen 1080p)

In Car Chase the situation is essentially the same as Manhattan, with the Pixel XL performing similarly to existing Snapdragon 820 devices. In both cases the performance is actually a bit better, but not significantly so. The OnePlus 3 pulls ahead of the Pixel XL in the on screen test, which makes sense given that it's a 1080p device sitting among 1440p devices. Car Chase isn't available on iOS so there's no way to compare to Apple's A10, but among Android devices the Pixel XL does provide the best GPU performance available right now.

The Pixel XL's GPU performance is in line with the current flagship Android phones. Of course, it's already November, so it won't be too long before we see the next generation of phones arrive. Launching this late into the year means that performance isn't going to be significantly better than the initial wave of Snapdragon 820 devices that have been available since February or March, which does put the Pixel in a bit of an awkward position as far as price is concerned. You can grab a OnePlus 3 for $399 and it will perform equally as well in GPU-bound applications as the Pixel, or you can spend the same amount as the Pixel on an iPhone and GPU performance is significantly better. Whether or not this matters really depends on the customer, but it's something to consider when considering the balance of performance and features relative to the cost of a device.

System Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

250 Comments

View All Comments

  • Flunk - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    It's like they built a $400 phone and a $500 phone and then just upped the price. It it any more compelling than the $400 OnePlus 3? Not really and that's been out a while.
  • amdwilliam1985 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    I think Google was "forced" to sell at higher price brackets. Targeting iPhone and Galaxy S/Note lines.

    Kind of like the surface pro/book line from Microsoft, if Microsoft lowers price to grab market shares, how the heck would Dell/HP/Lenovo survive with their cheap stuff?
  • Meteor2 - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link

    ...and Samsung at the expensive end too, I guess. Making this phone so poor compared to Samsung's efforts (which, like Apple's, I dislike but respect), keeps an important ally on-side.
  • Black Obsidian - Thursday, November 10, 2016 - link

    Speaking only for myself (as a potential buyer of one of these devices), I found the Pixel XL more compelling than OP3 due to:
    1) Higher-quality screen
    2) Higher-quality camera
    3) Guaranteed rapid availability of new Android versions/features
    4) Higher expectations of manufacturer support

    The above, combined with my Nexus 5 rapidly circling the reliability and performance drain, ultimately convinced me to (very grudgingly) pay the extra money for the Pixel XL. Obviously the Pixel's value proposition will be worse for people who value the above items less than I do.
  • nico_mach - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    One personal pet peeve about button placement and design: with the volume/power buttons in the middle, as on this phone and the 6P, it's hard to dock the phone in your car for directions. Because naturally the clamps would go in the middle of the phone, but you can't do that if it turns up/down the volume or powers it on/off. Android OEMs, take note!
  • blakeatwork - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    I thought I had the same problem. Easy fix; clamp it lower on the device. There is plenty of space on the bottom half to clamp below the volume button, and still maintain a good hold.
  • colts187 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    It looks to me like they got a lemon. I've had none of the memory issues/home redrawing stuff with my device. My battery life is EXCELLENT and so is the performance.
  • colts187 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    And I understand they got two review units. I'm just surprised based on my own personal usage.
  • ChernobylChild - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    Same here. It's an amazing phone and I've never been this disappointed in an Anandtech review.
  • alexdi - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link

    The review was clear and factual. Are you disappointed by facts?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now