Still Image Performance

Now that we’ve discussed the basics of the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus camera we can start to get into how it actually performs relative to the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus as well the current competition on the market. While we normally run an ISO test to check spatial resolution this has been deferred to a future portion of the review. Unfortunately we don't really have the ability to do time-invariant testing here in a serious manner to the same extent that an OEM might, so we're effectively limited to tripod comparisons of real-world subjects.

Daytime Photography

In this kind of scenario the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are directly comparable in the 1x mode. Because the primary camera has OIS and the secondary camera doesn't, it looks like it's fairly difficult for Apple to do an exact pixel to pixel correlation to the extent that the two outputs can be merged into a single image. As a result it's fairly obvious that the 1x mode has less detail than the 2x mode here. I can really see how this would be useful in general, as the longer focal length means more detail relative to anything else on the market but also allows for more interesting framing. The 1x camera is identical to the iPhone 7, and here it's definitely noticeable that the iPhone 7 can't quite keep up with the Galaxy S7 or HTC 10 in sheer detail in these kinds of shots.

Daytime Photography 2

In the interest of trying to not just take a single landscape photo and declare it to be a representative sample for all photos ever taken of all time with a smartphone in daytime conditions, I went ahead and took another sample shot of a mostly static subject. Here the iPhone 7 Plus in 1x mode is pretty much comparable to the iPhone 6s and Galaxy S7 as far as detail goes. I would argue that the HTC 10 captures slightly more detail at the center, but this probably isn't a surprise when the sensor is significantly larger. It's also worth noting that the iPhone 7 Plus manages to show better dynamic range here as the highlights off to the right retain more color detail than most devices tested and the shadows contain more detail that what is found on the Galaxy S7 or the iPhone 6s Plus. Once again, at 2x the iPhone 7 Plus is really just ridiculously good at capturing the sheer amount of detail that the tree has which isn't really captured by the 1x mode as most of the detail has to be blurred away to avoid aliasing. It's truly impressive how the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are actually capable of keeping up with the Galaxy S7 despite a smaller sensor, and we're really seeing the product of Apple's ISP lead here.

Low Light Photography 1

It probably is worth mentioning here that in low light the iPhone 7 Plus doesn't actually use the secondary camera at all due to its smaller aperture and lack of image stabilization, which means that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are identical in low light performance. Interestingly enough detail is fairly comparable between the iPhone 6s Plus and iPhones 7, with some minor adjustment to favor more noise reduction. I'm inclined to say that the Galaxy S7 and iPhone 7 are basically comparable here but the oversharpening on the Galaxy S7 remains fairly obvious and I would expect it to outperform in detail here but it's just comparable to the iPhone 7 due to the rather smeary noise reduction. The HTC 10 is the clear winner here as far as detail goes but both the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 really oversaturate the green shrubs while the iPhone 7 is much closer to what it should actually be. The oversaturated, smeary look that seems to dominate the Galaxy S7 output continues to be seriously off-putting for me.

Low Light Photography 2

It's interesting to see how Apple's noise and noise reduction seems to have changed from the 6 to 6s to 7 here. Detail is functionality identical but the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus clearly handle shadows better here as there's more detail and noise is controlled noticeably better with better detail and less visible noise. It's really impressive what Apple's processing is able to pull off here when sensor size and sensor technology hasn't really advanced that much from the iPhone 6s to iPhone 7. This is especially obvious when compared to the Galaxy S7, which has comparable overall detail but the noise reduction used is much more splotchy and has obvious oversharpening if you look too closely. Again, relative to the HTC 10 the sensor size deficit is very obvious here if you try to read the text on the trash cans, but the HTC 10's gamma and noise reduction algorithms are just not competitive in the shadows and it's obvious that there are uncorrected optical distortions in the light flares. The HTC 10 also tends to feel like it has a filter over the entire photo that makes it look a little soft compared to the iPhone 7 even if it does have better detail in some parts of the frame.

Low Light Photography 3

For whatever reason this scene always seems to at least mildly challenging. Here we can really start to see the softness that I'm talking about with the HTC 10, as the white pillar "bleeds" a bit into the brick wall exterior of Knudsen Hall. Detail on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus remains comparable to the iPhone 6s Plus, but with noticeably less noise. The Galaxy S7 manages to deliver similar levels of detail to the iPhone 7, but it definitely oversaturates the red brick colors which might be appealing but really isn't accurate when you look at the RAW reference. The noise reduction on the Galaxy S7 is noticeably splotchier here and gets much worse if you look at the top right quarter of the photo. I would actually say the iPhone 7 outperforms just about everything here but the LG G5, which has better detail but a really strange color rendition.

Overall, the iPhone 7 camera is impressive and I would argue is holistically a better camera for still photos than the Galaxy S7 on the basis of more accurate color rendition, cleaner noise reduction, and lack of aggressive sharpening. It may not be as lightning fast as the Galaxy S7 or have as many party tricks, but what it does have is extremely well executed. The HTC 10 is definitely better than the iPhone 7 at delivering sheer detail when only comparing the 28mm focal length camera, but the post-processing has a tendency to bleed colors in low light which sometimes causes the images to look a bit soft. In daytime the iPhone 7 Plus' 56mm equivalent camera helps to keep it well ahead of the curve when it comes to sheer detail and really is a revelatory experience after years of using smartphone cameras that have focal lengths as short as 22mm and can't really capture what the eye sees. However, in low light the sensor size deficit really starts to become obvious. I suspect the Pixel and Pixel XL will make this especially clear. If there's really no room to go up the ladder in sensor size, Apple really needs to consider some radical approaches to improving sensor sensitivity such as RWB pixel layouts or using the dual camera for an oversampling scheme.

Camera Architecture and UX Video Performance
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • solipsism - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    So you want legislation to artificially control smartphone prices and kill the free market. Brilliant¡

    If you graph the supply and demand for the iPhone you'll see that equilibrium price is actually lower than it could be. Meaning, Apple is actually losing money in the short term, but this isn't altruistic, but designed to help capture the market for the longterm, therefore increasing their overall profitshare. Economies of scale are already maxed out at it is.

    The cost of components or what you perceive as the value of a smartphone is irrelevant—all that matters is what the market dictates. If you feel that high-end smartphones are too expensive, then don't buy them. They did release an iPhone SE because the market wanted a 4" model. If you and enough others stop buying smartphones in this price range you'll see that ARP drop. This happened in India.
  • jlabelle2 - Friday, October 14, 2016 - link

    "They did release an iPhone SE because the market wanted a 4" model"

    Not at all. If it was the case, the sales of the iPhone 6 would not have been so huge compared to previous model.
    The release the SE because they wanted to target people not willing to spend 750-850$ on a phone. The SE is selling mostly because it is half the price and the cheaper iPhone ever sold.
  • grayson_carr - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    The price of iPhones has not risen. What are you talking about?
  • grayson_carr - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    The first iPhone was originally $599 subsidized with a two year contract, meaning over $1000 were it not for the subsidy, and the base model iPhone 3G was priced much lower at $599 full price without a contract, but that still equates to ~$670 today when you factor in inflation. So at a starting price of $649, the iPhone 7 is cheaper today than iPhones were 8 years ago accounting for inflation.
  • StrangerGuy - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I didn't knew owning luxury goods is a fundamental human right.

    It doesn't matter much you stinkers try to hide your entitlement syndrome under the guise "for the greater good", you still get smelled a million miles away.
  • kogtsalami - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Small correction: The iPhone 4 was not made of aluminium but stainless steel.
  • JoshHo - Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - link

    The intent was to say that the iPhone 4 was one of the first smartphones to use external antennas integrated into the design rather than internal antennas embedded in RF windows.
  • dsraa - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    No mention of the audio performance through the new dongle? what about bluetooth sound?? I know this is a brief review, but at the very least their should be a section on audio and how it compares to the 6s since there it is now done through a digital 'adapter'???
  • TechnologyGuy - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Sorry as usual with an iPhone review here - great on the details but illogical conclusions. The removal of 3.5mm headphone jack doesn't matter? That's a clear deal breaker for me, especially when AirPods for me literally belong in the garbage and having invested $1000's on headphones in the past. Not sure what you mean about the camera - iPhones have now barely caught up in quality, but clearly still lagging behind the S7 and Pixel. The iPhone 7 battery life is mediocore at best, and without fast charge or wireless charging - another automatic deal breaker for me. The screen is just passable in comparison to the competition.

    So really, the only thing that is industry-leading is the SoC, and I think at least for me, that hardly compensates for all the subpar areas. I am not sure why you are so obsessed with the SoC and system performance when the overall experience based on the components (at least those that matter in day-to-day usage - screen, camera, battery life/charging) is no batter than your average $300 phone. My experience with a phone does not depend how good I feel about the SoC under the hood. This phone is a clear no for me and not worth the $650-750 USD.
  • mrochester - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    You're forgetting that you need to consider the OS and ecosystem too. A phone isn't just a bunch of hardware components, and it's an OS and software layer too, which is much more important than the hardware anyway.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now