GPU and Gaming Benchmarks

Our next focus is on GPU-centric workloads. The full benchmark numbers are presented below, but the overall performance trends are similar to what we observed in the CPU benchmarks section. Even the gaming benchmarks across all kits had similar results. That said, the OpenCL accelerated Agisoft Photoscan Benchmark does show major performance improvements (around 4.5% in moving from 2133 MHz to 2400 MHz, and, around 15% in moving from 2400 MHz to 3067 MHz) with increasing memory frequency. This shows that real-life workloads that can take advantage of the higher memory frequency SODIMMs do exist, but, they are just not that common.

Futuremark 3DMark 11 and 3DMark 2013

Futuremark 3DMark 11

Futuremark 3DMark 11

Futuremark 3DMark 11

Futuremark 3DMark 2013

Futuremark 3DMark 2013

3D Rendering with OpenGL - CINEBENCH R15

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R15

Agisoft Photoscan Benchmark with OpenCL Acceleration

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2 (OpenCL Accelerated)

Gaming - Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs

Sleeping Dogs

Gaming - Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite

Bioshock Infinite

Gaming - Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

Gaming - DiRT Showdown

DiRT Showdown

DiRT Showdown

DiRT Showdown

Gaming - GRID Autosport

GRID Autosport

Gaming - The Talos Principle

The Talos Principle

The Talos Principle

CPU Performance Benchmarks Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks
Comments Locked

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • oguignant - Wednesday, September 7, 2016 - link

    between hyperx impact ddr4-2400 and corsair vengeance ddr4-2666, which is better?
    no matter the price.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now