Final Words

Rarely do we see a new phone that is not better than its predecessor. Often improvements are small, and occasionally a feature gets removed, but generally phones move in a positive direction. Meizu’s PRO 6 ends up going nowhere: It takes a few steps forward, but also takes a few steps backward.

Meizu already has a reputation for making nice-looking, well-built phones, and the PRO 6 is its best design yet. The phone’s rounded corners and edges make it comfortable to hold, and its symmetrical design and polished machining features, such as the chamfers on edges and cutouts, show great attention to detail. It feels solid with no unsightly gaps or blemishes—the PRO 6 is a physically premium phone.

The PRO 6’s display shows improvement over previous Meizu phones too. Just like Samsung’s Galaxy phones, the PRO 6 now offers three different display modes: a proper sRGB mode for people who value color accuracy and two wide-gamut modes for people who prefer more vibrant looking colors. The default white point is still too cool, which hurts both grayscale and color accuracy and gives the display a purple tint, but the PRO 6 includes a slider control for fine-tuning the color temperature that mostly alleviates this issue. Another nice addition is a boost feature for auto-brightness mode that increases brightness for better viewability in sunlight. The PRO 6 still does not get as bright as Samsung’s phones, though.

There are two major areas where the PRO 6 regresses, however: performance and battery life. The MediaTek Helio X25 SoC and its deca-core CPU does nothing to improve the phone’s user experience. The PRO 6 is slower than the PRO 5 and other flagship phones in nearly every test. While the difference is not huge, it’s noticeably slower at opening apps and running common workloads such as web browsing. It does at least manage to keep UI navigation and browser scrolling smooth.

The reason for the PRO 6’s disappointing performance is primarily because it does not fully utilize the Helio X25’s two higher-performing Cortex-A72 CPU cores, effectively limiting itself to an octa-core A53 design. I monitored core availability and frequency while running a variety of workloads and rarely saw the A72s online for more than a second or two. Update 1/19/2017: Performance is much better after updating to Flyme OS 5.2.5.0G, which adjusted the load threshold values, allowing threads to migrate to the A72 cores more frequently.

The PRO 6 is also unsuitable for playing modern 3D games. Even though the Mali-T880MP4 GPU cannot match the peak performance of higher-end configurations, it’s still fast enough to handle most games currently available; however, an outdated graphics driver coupled with the PRO 6’s refusal to use the A72 CPU cores conspire to reduce performance to unplayable levels in many games. Casual gaming is still an option, but a flagship phone should not suffer from performance restrictions.

The PRO 6’s smaller than average battery, an example of Meizu prioritizing form over function, places it behind the Huawei P9, Samsung Galaxy S7, and Xiaomi Mi5 Pro—all phones with similar size screens—in our battery tests. A spare charger or battery pack will be necessary accessories for the PRO 6, because it struggles to make it through a whole day of moderate to heavy usage.


Flyme OS 5.2 User Interface Design (poor image quality due to gif format)

The PRO 6 ships with Flyme OS 5.2, Meizu’s custom skin that runs on top of Android 6.0. We took a detailed look at Flyme 5.1 in our Meizu M3 note review, and other than an update from Android 5.1 to 6.0, the newest version is largely the same. What I like most about Flyme are its navigation improvements like replacing Android’s trio of navigation buttons with a simple swipe gesture and a multifunction home button. There’s also the “SmartTouch” feature, a small, semi-transparent joystick/button that can be assigned various shortcuts such as pulling down the notification shade, locking the screen, or switching between open apps. The button can be placed anywhere on the screen which makes it a useful feature for one-handed use.

This focus on streamlining navigation ties in nicely with the PRO 6’s signature new hardware/software feature: a pressure sensitive screen with haptic feedback that Meizu calls 3D Press. Just like Apple’s 3D Touch technology in the iPhone 6s, the PRO 6 allows you to press an icon on the home screen to open a shortcut menu or press on a hyperlink, email, or text message to see a preview of what it links to. Swiping up opens a menu with additional options or you can press a little harder to open the content fullscreen. The technology works as advertised, but because there’s no native API support in Android for these types of interactions, 3D Press only works with Meizu’s apps, greatly reducing its usefulness. Because most of the apps I use are from Google and third-parties, which do not support 3D Press, I found myself forgetting the PRO 6 even has this capability.


Meizu's 3D Press In Action: Icon shortcuts (left/right) and URL preview (right)
(poor image quality due to gif format)

Since we’re talking software, now is a good time to discuss updates. Meizu releases fairly regular updates for Flyme OS, but is very slow at releasing Android updates for existing devices, assuming they get an update at all. For example, Meizu released Flyme 5.2, its first OS based on Android 6, only at the end of May, and 3 months later there’s still no international ROM update for its older devices. Meizu also does not release security updates. In Flyme 5.2, there’s no entry in the settings app that even lists the Android security patch level—never a good sign. Taking a look at the system files shows that the PRO 6 is stuck on the 2/1/2016 patch that is almost 7 months out of date!

The PRO 6 is not a clear upgrade over the PRO 5 nor does it separate itself far enough from the less expensive Meizu MX6. Its only real advantage over Meizu’s other phones is a smaller, easier to handle size, and its few strengths are not enough to elevate it above its peers either. The PRO 6’s merely passable performance, poor battery life, and lack of timely software updates ruin an otherwise good phone.

Audio & Video Quality
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • mczak - Friday, August 26, 2016 - link

    The Helio X20/X25 does not compete with SD 820, neither with price nor performance. Nor efficiency (I'd argue that's impossible with planar 20nm). And I don't think it was meant to compete (it also for instance only has lte cat 6 vs cat 12 for the SD 820, not that I think this really makes much of a difference). The SD 650/652 though should be way closer in all relevant categories - price, performance, efficiency, features. (Personally I'd take a SD 650 over a X25 any day, because it appears to be a bit more efficient - I have no idea which one is cheaper though.)
  • serendip - Saturday, August 27, 2016 - link

    The X20/X25 is supposed to be Mediatek's flagship SoC but it can barely compete against a cheap low-end chip like the SD650 in the Redmi Note 3. I don't know if it's Meizu's poor kernel tuning configs or if the X20 has a suboptimal 3-cluster setup. To me, that mid range cluster seems redundant when an efficient A53 cluster should be the main processing cluster with fast A72 cores being used for bursty tasks, for a fast race-to-idle.
  • serendip - Saturday, August 27, 2016 - link

    The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 with the X20 was just launched in China. I'd like to see a comparo between an X10 Note 3, SD650 Note 3 and X20 Note 4 - as they're all from the same manufacturer, software and tuning should be similar so any differences would be down to the SoC.
  • colinstu - Friday, August 26, 2016 - link

    So mediocre performance and basically the worst battery life. Got it.
  • zodiacfml - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    LOL. This cracked me up. I don't know why. Maybe there's too many devices coming out there, and we have little time to spend on each mediocre device.
    Personally, when it comes to actually buying an Android, it should be a Nexus or nothing at all. I can't even accept that Android 7.0 is not coming to Nexus 5 which is still flagship performance to me (I just don't like its battery life though).
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    See, thats the thing. Nexus phones have poor battery life. Google needs to enforce something closer to 6-7 hours of SoT, not this 3.5 hour BS theyve been doing.

    Also, blame qualcomm for the lack of 7.0. They refuse to make GPU drivers for the SD80x line for 7.0.
  • Daniel Egger - Friday, August 26, 2016 - link

    Funny, there're now so many keywords which make me stop reading phone reviews: Usually I manage to get all the way to the ridiculous display size but in this case the CPU is the clear no-go.
  • tipoo - Friday, August 26, 2016 - link

    That's a pretty elegant way to do the antenna lines.
  • Meteor2 - Friday, August 26, 2016 - link

    I'll be shot down... But I really like the Octane benchmark. Please include it in reviews!
  • Eden-K121D - Friday, August 26, 2016 - link

    Great review Matt.Basically yuck phone

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now