Final Words

The Intel SSD 540s is their first entry level consumer SSD in quite a while, and our first look at Silicon Motion's new SM2258 controller. It's a little surprising to see Intel being an early adopter of a third-party SSD controller after their SandForce-based drives spent so much time going through Intel's QA, but the SM2258 is not a radical departure from Silicon Motion's earlier controllers, which have a pretty good track record for reliability.

Intel's use of the same 16nm SK Hynix TLC NAND as in the ADATA Premier SP550 allowed us to make a direct comparison of the SM2258 controller against the preceding SM2256, and the Crucial BX200 provides another point of comparison with Micron's 16nm TLC instead. The 540s is much better than the BX200 in every way, but that's not saying much. Against the SP550, the Intel 540s was not able to score a clear win. On most synthetic benchmarks the 540s improved performance over the SM2256 drives, mitigating their most glaring weaknesses and occasionally rising above the field of budget TLC drives in general. These improvements did not translate into a significant advantage over the SP550 on our real-world AnandTech Storage Bench tests. The ADATA SP550 is still faster overall for realistic workloads with bursts of I/O, even though it is slower under the sustained load of synthetic benchmarks.

The wide disparity in performance between the Crucial BX200 and ADATA SP550 showed just how much firmware tuning can affect drive performance. I think it's likely that later this year we'll see a more refined SM2258 drive, perhaps even on planar TLC before 3D NAND is cheap enough.

Budget SSD Retail Price Comparison
Capacity 120-128GB 240-256GB 480-512GB 960-1024GB
Intel SSD 540s 2.5" $51.95 (43¢/GB) $93.91 (39¢/GB) $149.99 (31¢/GB) $304.96 (30¢/GB)
Intel SSD 540s M.2 $49.95 (42¢/GB) $91.77 (38¢/GB) $155.65 (32¢/GB) $305.29 (31¢/GB)
ADATA SP550 $37.88 (32¢/GB) $57.99 (24¢/GB) $107.99 (22¢/GB) $205.99 (21¢/GB)
OCZ TR150 $37.99 (32¢/GB) $59.99 (25¢/GB) $99.95 (21¢/GB) $199.99 (21¢/GB)
SanDisk X400 $49.59 (39¢/GB) $80.19 (31¢/GB) $126.23 (25¢/GB) $237.99 (23¢/GB)

Against the wider field of competitors, the Intel 540s is clearly an entry-level SSD, intended for light workloads. It cannot keep pace with SanDisk's X400 or even the current generation of Phison S10-based drives like the Toshiba OCZ TR150 (formerly Trion 150). The ADATA SP550 has held on to a place in the market by usually being one of the cheapest drives available, but at the moment it is mostly tied with the TR150 on price, making the latter a better purchase given its better performance.

The current retail pricing of the Intel SSD 540s makes my recommendation quite simple: don't buy. The 180GB and 360GB models are only a few dollars cheaper than the next size up, and the four standard sized models are priced above many MLC drives. The OCZ TR150 provides better performance for a far lower price. The SanDisk X400 provides much better performance, the same 5-year warranty period of the 540s, and M.2 models for a significantly lower price. ADATA has also recently announced M.2 versions of the SP550, which will probably be only a little more expensive than the 2.5" drives, providing a very welcome cheap M.2 option.

ATTO, AS-SSD & Idle Power Consumption
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • redzo - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    About the same price as a 850 EVO. The 540s is not worthy of your $$.
  • Anato - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    Why this is 540, not 340 or even 140?
  • BurntMyBacon - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    Apparently, their 300 series has fallen off of their roadmap. Someone please link me to a roadmap that counters this statement.
  • pwil - Wednesday, July 27, 2016 - link

    Because 140 would have 1y warranty, and 340 - 3y warranty.
  • nismotigerwvu - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    The idea of Intel, owner of the most advanced foundries on the planet, buying chips from the open market is oddly humorous to me. I understand why, and honestly it makes logical sense, but it's still an interesting quirk in an industry where quirkiness has mostly vanished.
  • bloodinmyveins - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    Why is it so hard to dethrone Samsung 850 EVO and PRO? :(
  • redzo - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    They've just designed a product and are 100% sure that they are going to sell it overpriced based on brand name only. It's business.
  • Vlad_Da_Great - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    That was a bummer. I bought that with the notion that inside was Intel parts. I guess, they are trying to bang on their name now. 540s has been great so far, but I could have saved about $20 for the 120GB, I bought. AnandTech you are late!
  • cm2187 - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    With Samsung about to introduce 4TB SSDs, a 1TB max size seems to be behind...
  • Ej24 - Thursday, June 23, 2016 - link

    Wow. Not only would I not purchase one of these, but I'm now convinced I need to buy several mx200's as it seems crucial isn't going to release another MLC drive. TLC simply doesn't impress me. The bx200 I put in my mother-in-law's pc was a disaster (granted its a worst case scenario). It's enough to demonstrate the shortcomings of tlc though. They're only able to make up for it with black magic and sophisticated controllers. No thank you.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now