Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks 3 years later, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. Crytek’s DX11 masterpiece, Crysis 3’s Very High settings still punish even the best of video cards, never mind the rest. Along with its high performance requirements, Crysis 3 is a rather balanced game in terms of power consumption and vendor optimizations. As a result it can give us a good look at how our video cards stack up on average, and later on in this article how power consumption plays out.

Crysis 3 - 3840x2160 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality + FXAA

This being the first cycle we’ve used the Very High settings, it’s humorous to see a $700 video card getting 35fps on a 3 year old game. Very High settings give Crysis 3 a level of visual quality many games still can’t match, but the tradeoff is that it obliterates most video cards. We’re probably still 3-4 years out from a video card that can run at 4K with 4x MSAA at 60fps, never mind accomplishing that without the MSAA.

The GTX 1080 does however at least get the distinction of being the one and only card to crack 30fps at 4K. Though 30fps is not suggested for Crysis, it can legitimately claim to be the only card that can even handle the game at 4K with a playable framerate at this time. Otherwise if we turn down the resolution, the GTX 1080 is now the only card to crack 60fps at 1440p. Very close to that mark though is the GTX 1070, which at 58.1fps is a small overclock away from 60fps.

Looking at the generational comparisons, GTX 1080 and GTX 1070 lead by a bit less than usual, at 62% and 51% respectively. The GTX 1080/1070 gap on the other hand is pretty typical, with the GTX 1080 leading by 27% at 4K, 23% at 1440p, and 21% at 1080p.

Battlefield 4 The Witcher 3
Comments Locked

200 Comments

View All Comments

  • bill44 - Friday, July 22, 2016 - link

    That's the problem. I know nothing about the 900 series audio capabilities (which I suppose is the same as the 800 series ;) ) and no one publishes them in review. All reviews are incomplete.

    Anyone here knows at least the supported audio sampling rates? If not, I think my best bet is going with AMD (which I'm shure supports 88.2 & 176.4 KHz).
  • bill44 - Saturday, July 23, 2016 - link

    Anyone?
  • poohbear - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    thank you for the review, late as it is it's still an excellent review and love the details!
  • junky77 - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    In other reviews, even a Haswell-E is limited for GPUs like GTX 1070
  • JamesAnthony - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    I really appreciate all the work that went into this in depth review.

    I especially am very glad that you included the GTX 680 in the benchmarks along with all the other cards after it.
    It's often really hard to get an overview of performance over a couple years.

    I'm looking at upgrading 2 systems from GTX680 to either GTX 1070 or GTX 1060 and Titan (original one) to GTX 1080, so this helps see what the performance would be like.
    Hopefully you tested the 1060 the same way so I can just plug the numbers for it into the same graph.

    Thanks again!
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    Be sure to check Bench. The 1060 results are already there, so you can see those comparisons right now.
  • fivefeet8 - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    2nd page 3rd paragraph: "generational increate in performance". ;increase?
    2nd page 2nd section: "Pascal in an architecture that I’m not sure has any real parallel on a historical basis". ;is?
  • hansmuff - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    Great review, i like that you went into all the hardware details. Worth the wait.
  • Chaser - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    I'm a Nvidia guy all the way. For now. I am disappointed in the midrange RX480 and it's power consumption compared to the competition, especially after they had said that Polaris was goingto primarily be an efficiency improvement.
    Outside of my bias I truly hope AMD provides a very competitive flagship in the near future. Everyone wins. But with the 1060 now announced it just makes AMD's GPU prospects and profitability questionable.
  • MarkieGcolor - Wednesday, July 20, 2016 - link

    So basically after all the hype about finfet, we get a standard, if not disappointing jump this generation also with a price hike. I'm so relieved that I didn't wait for this generation and can just enjoy my current 970 sli/nano crossfire rigs. AMD easily has the opportunity to blow these cards out of the water with big gpus.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now