System Performance

When you buy a Razer Blade Stealth, you get just a single CPU option in the Intel Core i7-6500U processor. This is a dual-core chip with hyperthreading, and it has a base frequency of 2.5 GHz with a turbo frequency of 3.1 GHz. On the CPU side, it’s the second fastest offering in the standard "2+2" 15W Skylake-U series, with only the i7-6600U above it . This 15-Watt processor has Intel’s HD 520 graphics, with 24 execution units and a maximum frequency of 1.05 GHz. With Razer’s gaming heritage, it would have been nice to see the new "2+3e" Iris parts with eDRAM, but likely due to the target price this wasn’t an option. Meanwhile the 8 GB of RAM is DDR3-1866 in a dual-channel configuration.

The model tested is the Core i7-6500U with 8 GB of memory, 512 GB of storage, and the UHD display.

To test the system performance, the Stealth has been put through our standard notebook workload. The Stealth has been put up against several other Ultrabooks to see where it fits in performance wise, but if you want to compare it to any other device we’ve tested, please check out our Notebook Bench.

PCMark

PCMark 8 - Home

PCMark 8 - Creative

PCMark 8 - Work

PCMark 7 (2013)

PCMark attempts to simulate real-life workloads with several sets of tests. The workload tests all aspects of the device, and factors like the display resolution can come into play here on the gaming tests. Storage has its own set of tests which recently changed, so the new results are not comparable to the old ones. The workload is varied, and the Stealth falls in-line with other similar devices, although the high resolution display certainly pulls the scores down a bit compared to the competition.

Cinebench

Cinebench R15 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R15 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R11.5 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R11.5 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench is a rendering program, with single-thread, multi-thread, and OpenGL tests. For notebooks, we focus on the single and multi-threaded tests, and this is a good indication of CPU performance. The i7-6500U does especially well in the multi-threaded portion.

x264

x264 HD 5.x

x264 HD 5.x

This test converts a 1080p video into the x264 format, and like Cinebench, it prefers high CPU frequencies and more cores. The Core i7 does very well in this test relative to other Ultrabooks.

Web Tests

Web browsing is still one of the most common tasks anyone does on a PC, so strong performance here is always a benefit. The scores below will be either done with Google Chrome as the browser if the machine was running Windows 8.1, or Microsoft Edge if the device was running Windows 10.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Google Octane 2.0

WebXPRT 2013

WebXPRT 2015

While not quite as fast as the Microsoft Surface Book, the Razer Blade Stealth still does very will in these tests.

Design GPU and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

66 Comments

View All Comments

  • sor - Tuesday, March 29, 2016 - link

    Is the "unique cooling solution" referred to, with the exhaust in the hinge, like the macbooks have had? The description makes it sound the same, but that wouldn't be unique so I'm wondering if I'm misunderstanding something.
  • NeatOman - Wednesday, March 30, 2016 - link

    Still happy with my 2+ year old Yoga 2 Pro, i5/4GB with the 3200x1800 IPS screen that gets over 6 hours of usable battery life with light browsing and back-lit keyboard on. Upgraded the SSD to a 250GB 850 EVO and Intel Wireless-AC 7260 which made a big difference.
  • R3MF - Wednesday, March 30, 2016 - link

    As a 'cheap' ultrabook i'm interested in how well it will run a modern linux distro.

    Specifically:
    Whether the backlight will work - even if it just produces a uniform glow (rather than full Chroma glory)
    Whether the Type-C thunderbolt port will function for data (just PCIe, or USB too?)?
  • 06GTOSC - Wednesday, March 30, 2016 - link

    I'm definitely looking forward to 3-4 years from now when hopefully external graphics are a far more common thing and the prices drop. I'd love to have a notebook with a good CPU and lots of RAM that I can hook to an external GPU to game with. But at roughly $900 for the Razer setup, plus one of their laptops, it's a no go for most. Granted I'm sure plenty will soon be putting themselves heavily into debt to have the latest and greatest.
  • deeps6x - Wednesday, April 6, 2016 - link

    "Razer could have easily put a 13.3-inch panel into this notebook."

    Yes, they could have, and IF they had done that, I might be interested in it. Too bad. No sale here.

    If they do come to their senses in the future, stick to 1080P and 4k as panel resolution options.
  • deeps6x - Wednesday, April 6, 2016 - link

    Why are you comparing it to the gimped Zenbook? Compare it to the Zenbook with the same Core i7-6500U. Heck, use the version with the 940M in it as well. It will still be far cheaper than this Razor model.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now