Subjective Evaluation

If we ignore pricing, our overall opinion of the P-7808u is actually quite good. It performs well, in both games and applications, and surprisingly enough battery life isn't all that bad - at least for a gaming notebook. The only people likely to be unhappy with the performance offered are gamers that "need" more than 60 frames per second at maximum detail in the latest and greatest titles.

As always, the first thing we did after booting up the laptop was to remove all the extra software that we didn't want. That 60 day trial to Symantec Norton 360 2009? Gone! I suppose it might keep you safe if you don't know how to avoid downloading malicious programs, or if you don't like to update Windows on a regular basis, but personally I've never had an issue with my computers getting infected (unless I do something stupid). Regardless, performance is slower when running antivirus and/or firewall software, so for testing purposes it has to go. After removing the unnecessary applications and utilities, the system boots quicker, but plenty of processes remain. All of these are accepted tools, however, mostly involving drivers for the various pieces of hardware (touchpad, audio, GPU, Bluetooth, WiFi, etc.)

In day-to-day use, the P-7808u almost feels like the exact opposite of the Dell Studio XPS 16. Performance in most areas improves, and gaming performance in particular is substantially better than the Studio XPS 16. However, where we absolutely loved the LCD on the Dell laptop, the P-7808u display leaves us wanting. It's reasonably bright, but that brightness applies to both whites as well as blacks. The contrast ratio was noticeably bad, even without any testing. Set this laptop next to the Dell Studio XPS 16 and you'll most likely be sorely tempted to give up any gaming performance in order to get the improved display. If Gateway (or anyone else for that matter) is looking to do a more substantial revision to the P-series FX laptops, we would love to see a 16" chassis that includes a high-end GPU and the Seiko Epson RGB LED LCD! Even if companies want to go with lower resolution LCDs, please - please! - stop using these cheap, 200:1 contrast ratio LCDs. $50 or more for a better LCD is something over 90% of our readers said they would like to see.


Besides the downgraded LCD, we don't have many serious complaints. One area that we have been generally pleased with on FX notebooks is the keyboard layout. You get a full size keyboard and number keypad, and the location of the keys makes sense. Most of us prefer to have the Fn key inside of the Ctrl key in the bottom left corner, but Anand is the exception, preferring the Gateway layout. (I can't tell you how many times I pressed Fn+C for "copy" instead of Ctrl+C….) Ultimately, though, the keyboard has a good feel and is as comfortable to use as any notebook we've tested. You also get a rather large palm rest, which helps with the overall feel of the keyboard. Gateway could add some extras like LED backlighting on the keyboard, but that's not strictly necessary and provided costs are kept reasonable, we're perfectly happy with the current design.

Stability and reliability during testing were good for the most part. Towards the end of testing, however, we started to have some odd crashes. Windows would simply quit responding. The mouse would work, but nothing else was responsive and we had to force shutdown the laptop (i.e. hold in the power button for several seconds). We could still ping the laptop through the network, and sounds would play as well (i.e. close the lid and you hear the "device disconnected" sound; open the lid and hear the "device connected" sound). However, even pressing CTRL+ALT+DELETE failed to make the laptop respond, along with any other keyboard shortcuts. Stability problems are a huge concern for anyone spending a lot of money on a laptop, and at $1700 the P-7808u is not cheap.

We delayed our review a little bit longer to try to get at the bottom of the sudden instability - the first several weeks of testing went without a hitch. Over the weekend, we were able to determine that the problems were caused by the Western Digital 500GB hard drive. We could boot up the system and use it, sometimes for hours, but periodically the hard drive would just stop responding, at which point we had to force shutdown the system. Over the past few days, this began occurring more frequently until the system became unusable. We purchased a 500GB Seagate hard drive, cloned the original drive onto it using Clonezilla (an extremely handy, fast, and free disk imaging/cloning utility that I highly recommend), and all of our instability issues complete disappeared. We can't really fault Gateway for the instability, ultimately, since it was caused by the hard drive failing. A small percentage of computer components inevitably fail, typically within the first few weeks of use, and that's most likely what happened with the Western Digital hard drive.

Subjectively, the Gateway P-7808u provides a reasonable cost gaming notebook. If you're in the market for that sort of system, it's definitely worth a look. However, as we already mentioned, we actually prefer some of the past Gateway FX laptops to the P-7808u because they provided a better combination of price, features, and performance. Starting with the original P-6831, Gateway seemed to get the idea that building a cost-effective gaming notebook means spending more money on the GPU and less money on the CPU. The fastest processor in the world won't do you any good if your graphics chip isn't up to the task. Conversely, a reasonable GPU with one of the "slower" CPUs can help keep prices in check while still providing a good gaming experience. NVIDIA loves it when we say stuff like that, but it's absolutely true: gaming systems (particularly laptops) need a good graphics chip first and foremost.

The P-7808u still offers good gaming performance, but the use of a nearly $400 quad-core processor - which won't benefit the vast majority of games - makes it rather unbalanced. Couple that with an LCD that regresses to what we saw over a year ago in the P-6831 and we have to admit we're a little concerned Gateway is going backwards. At the very least, they are doing what most other companies do when it comes to gaming laptops: they provide more power than you need in the CPU department at the expense of GPU power, resulting in lower overall game performance and a higher price. Instead of a quad-core CPU, we would rather see a more meaningful upgrade in the GPU department - something like the GTX 260M with a P8600 CPU would be far more compelling.

Specifications and Features Test Setup
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jedi2155 - Sunday, April 19, 2009 - link

    I have a Gateway 7805u right as well but it has a Western Digital 7200 RPM 320 GB instead of the 500 GB 5400 RPM model.

    Lately in the past month or so I've had a few freezes that are exactly as you described in this article. I'm wondering if that issue is happening to a lot of other WD hard drives or is it just ours that are defective.
  • Myrandex - Friday, April 17, 2009 - link

    I bought the 7805u a couple of months ago and I have to say that I am extremely pleased. Another advantage to that laptop is the 7200RPM hard drive as compared to the 5400RPM hard drive in this laptop that was reviewed. I don't mind the 1440x900 resolution, but I never saw the one before it. I just can compare it to other screens on laptops that I use and it seems alright. I do wish that the Fn and Ctrl keys were swapped though. I also feel that the speakers were a little lacking compared to other laptops from other companies. Some in the same price range had 4 speakers instead of 2, or a small built in sub, etc.

    I have thought about popping in a Quad whenever I feel that I'd need it, but for now I'm more than happy with the Dually that is in it.

    Jason
  • Marcel17 - Thursday, April 16, 2009 - link

    C'mon Gateway , pluck your arses or eyes or whatever you use to receive visual information , and see the product for what really is BEFORE you get it out the door .
    It seems that in the last few years the laptop manufacturers have a world championship :Who can shove the ****est panel in a laptop and and sell it for 1500 bucks .These displays do have a place on the market and it's called entry level or to quantify the 400-666 $ segment .
    Me ? I'll gladly send some more money to Dell for that sweet 16 . By the time I will save 1500 it will have Win.7 and ATI 4650M and it will be Purrrfect.
  • 7Enigma - Wednesday, April 15, 2009 - link

    What happened to the lower/higher is better in the screen benchmarks? I just got done praising you in the Dell review, and come to this one and see it's back to the old subtitles without telling us what is better/worse. Please bring it back!
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, April 15, 2009 - link

    Sorry - had it on one of the charts, but it wasn't in my spreadsheet since I updated the charts directly. Consider me flogged... I'll go update the graphs and spreadsheet now.
  • atlmann10 - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link

    Hey if you want one from BB try the ASUS it looked pretty sweet. I actually bought the P-7811FX, and am reasonably happy with it. However, if I had the choice to make again I would go with a smaller lighter unit. Do not get me wrong the 7811 is great, but really how often do I game on it? The answer is not much. I use my desktop for gaming, and yes if I was on the road that may be different. But if I was on the road for work I think the time spent gamin would still be rather low. So lighter more transportable with power would be my pick now. This new unit I don't see the point much. Yes; it has a quad cpu but really what makes use of that especially that your going to run on a laptop. Even games don't make use of more than 2 cpus, then one is handling regular computer duty in the background maybe but I doubt it. I also think they should have done a 1600-1680 rez faster refresh display. So this package? Maybe if it was a full desktop replacement because I know first hand you can really forget mobility to the greatest degree.
  • nubie - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link

    Re:

    [quote]drivers for the various pieces of hardware (touchpad, audio, GPU, Bluetooth, WiFi, etc.)[/quote]

    I watched my brother kill all of the processes/widgets associated with his 'drivers' for audio/video and it didn't stop the drivers from working just fine.

    I wish that it was made optional to have these widgets run when you install the drivers.

    Worst is printer drivers, I don't need 5 widgets running full time and locking up the system just to print. When will they learn?

    On topic:

    I think that for "gaming" they need to offer a 3 ghz dual core with a 98/112/128 SP card. (I am ashamed that they consider the 48 SP card a 9600GS on the desktop, and this "9800M" with the specs of a 9600GT is pitiful).

    I suppose that is nVidia's fault, but it would be nice if the laptop came with more graphics power. Although this is a decent amount of power for the money (Around $1,000 - $1,500).

    I like that they are keeping the chassis the same and focusing on what matters, the hardware.

    They should offer an OCZ or SuperTalent SSD, it would really make a noticeable difference in the computing feel for $130/209/345 more in 32/60/120GB capacities.

    I don't know if this lappy is set up for dual hard drives, but if it was you could spin down the HDD 80-95% of the time and run the OS and main apps on the SSD.
  • JarredWalton - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link

    Many of the driver widgets aren't 100% necessary and are merely system tray icons. However, rarely have I had any crashes that I would blame on touchpad, audio, keyboard, WiFi, etc. widgets. With 4GB of RAM, I just don't notice a difference between running with or without the drivers; some of the drivers are also necessary. Touchpad drivers as an example enable scrolling at the edges, I believe, along with some other extras (which you may or may not like). Another one that seems necessary for full functionality is the WiFi driver, though even there you can usually switch to letting Windows manage that connection and get rid of another app.

    As for printers... well, if all you need to do is print (as opposed to scanning, faxing, etc. with a multifunction printer), you can usually do a "driver only" install and ignore the manufacturer applications that tell you about ink levels and such. I hate those large driver suites almost as much as I despise the 5-8 processes created by most "Internet Security" suites.
  • crimson117 - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link

    I like the Gateway® P-7805u FX Edition for $1,149.99.

    $1150 at best buy. It has a P8400 (2.26ghz dual core 3mb cache) instead of the Q9000, and a 320gb instead of 500gb HD. Otherwise, it looks identical.

    Well worth saving $550 over the 7808u!
  • crimson117 - Monday, April 13, 2009 - link

    I also posted that before reading the final page of the review... ;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now