FSB Overclocking Results

Front Side Bus Overclocking Testbed
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 4000+ ( San Diego)
AMD Opteron 170 ( Toledo)
CPU Voltage:
AMD Athlon 64 4000+
AMD Opteron 170

1.5250V (1.4000V default)
1.4500V (1.3500V default)
Memory Settings: 2.5-3-3-7 1T - (12x)
2.5-3-3-7 1T - (10x)
Memory Voltage: 2.9V +.30mV
NB 1.2V Setting: 1.60V
HT Voltage: 1.35V
LDT Multiplier: 5x up to 250HTT, 4x up to 285HTT
Memory: OCZ PC4800 Platinum Edition
Cooling: Zalman CNPS9500
Power Supply: OCZ Power Stream 520
Maximum CPU OverClock:
(AMD Athlon 64 4000+)
256HTT x 12 (3072MHz) +28%
Maximum HTT OverClock:
(AMD Athlon 64 4000+)
256HTT x 9 (2304MHz) +28%
Maximum CPU OverClock:
(AMD Opteron 170)
285HTT x 10 (2850MHz) +42%
Maximum HTT OverClock:
(AMD Opteron 170)
285HTT x 9 (2565MHz) +42%

Our 4000+ CPU posted excellent results in the stock multiplier overclocking test. The board is definitely a very good overclocker, but the issue with the 1.1 BIOS not allowing effective overclocking past the maximum HTT setting at stock multipliers is not acceptable. As an example we had no issue overclocking our AMD Athlon 64 4000+ to a 322 HTT setting at a 9x multiplier with the version 1.0 BIOS but could not reliably exceed a 256 HTT setting with the 1.1 BIOS. At these overclock settings, the system was able to complete all of our benchmark test suites three consecutive times and run Prime95 and SuperPI without issue. While the results do not match those of the AMD Athlon X2 based systems, the board produced top results in the 3DMark05 overclocking results for an AMD Athlon 64 CPU and X1900 CrossFire combination. In fact, this test combination exceeded our Asus A8R-MVP results by almost 400 3DMarks at similar settings.

Our Opteron 170 posted excellent results at the stock multiplier settings. However, this CPU has reached 2.95GHz on 1.450V in past testing. Once again, the issue with the 1.1 BIOS not allowing effective overclocking past the maximum HTT setting at stock multipliers is not acceptable. At the 10x285 overclock settings, the system was able to complete all of our benchmark test suites three consecutive times and run Prime95 and SuperPI without issue. Overall, the board would make an excellent platform for overclocking with BIOS corrections.


Memory Stress Testing

Memory stress tests look at the ability of the Abit AT8 to operate at the officially supported memory frequencies of DDR-400, at the best performing memory timings that the OCZ PC4800 Platinum Edition will support.

Abit AT8
Stable DDR-400 Timings - 2 DIMMs
(2/4 slots populated - 1 Dual-Channel Bank)
Clock Speed: 200MHz
CAS Latency: 2
RAS to CAS Delay: 2
RAS Precharge: 2
RAS Cycle Time: 5
Command Rate: 1T
Voltage: 2.7V

The Abit AT8 was very stable with 2 DDR modules in Dual-Channel mode at the settings of 2-2-2-5 at 2.7V provided that we used the OCZ PC4800 memory and 1.1 BIOS. We will now install all four available memory slots, which will result in more strenuous requirements on the memory subsystem than testing 2 DDR modules on a motherboard.

Abit AT8
Stable DDR-400 Timings - 4 DIMMs
(4/4 slots populated - 2 Dual-Channel Banks)
Clock Speed: 200MHz (800FSB)
CAS Latency: 2
RAS to CAS Delay: 2
RAS Precharge: 2
RAS Cycle Time: 7
Command Rate: 2T
Voltage: 2.8V

The Abit AT8 was very stable with 4 DDR modules in Dual-Channel operation at the settings of 2-2-2-7, but required the command rate to be increased to 2T along with a voltage increase to 2.8. Once again, we had to utilize our OCZ PC4800 memory and BIOS 1.1 in order to achieve these settings. Although other memory types were fully compatible, they required the 1.1 BIOS and memory settings adjusted to SPD values in the BIOS for one reboot sequence before changing the memory settings manually.

Abit AT8: Features Test Setup
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • FireTech - Monday, April 10, 2006 - link

    Status Update - Revised 1.1 Bios

    Abit provided us a revised 1.1 bios tonight (3-9-06) for additional testing and it will be available on Abit's website shortly. We will update the article after our regression testing is completed.


    Hi Gary, it would be great if you could please do that promised follow-up review update for the AT8 especially now the AT8 32X is out. It has beeen a while since the initial review and so things should have settled down now or possibly even a new 'beyond 1.1' beta BIOS has been produced for you?
    Please update this review and maybe have a follow up on all the Crossfire boards you have reviewed. There seem to be quite a few owners talking on various forums who bought on the strength of these reviews and are relying on you to get things moving on the manufacturer support front...
    I'm personally just waiting to see if the AT8 can be the board it was advertised to be before I take the plunge. Why buy into trouble if you don't need to, I've done the 'early adopter' thing too often already?
  • Gary Key - Monday, July 3, 2006 - link

    We are still seeing issues with Infineon based memory that is set to 2-3-2-5 in the SPD, the board will not boot. If your memory utilizes these IC chips, the only choice you is to install some Samsung TCCD, boot the board, manually change the CAS to 2.5, reboot, shutdown, install the other memory, and boot again. Hopefully, Abit will do another bios spin, otherwise, you are left with this hack.
  • Zoomer - Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - link

    Wish you could plug abit's use of the 882D more, it seems to be an excellent realtek chipset. It matches the x-fi in the 3d rightmark tests and is competitive with it even in games. Excellent job!

    Another thing: Could you guys do some objective listening tests to the audio output? Blind A/B switches between the HDA and onboard audio using good quality speakers and/or headphones will be welcome. :)
  • Gary Key - Friday, March 24, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Another thing: Could you guys do some objective listening tests to the audio output?


    Our next step in audio testing, besides subjective remarks, will be doing objective audio tests (besides sampling output from RMAA 5.5) on each new codec implemented on a board. We are still deciding how to do this and my personal preference is to provide a download link to a high quality audio output file from each codec tested. These files would be a standardized clip from a music selection, movie scene, and game sequence. The question is if we will receive permission from the involved parties to allow distribution and obviously what choice of equipment to utilize for the audio capture without distorting the file before playback through the on-board codec or discreet card. Something on the list to do besides new creating new benchmarks also....... :)
  • Zoomer - Saturday, March 25, 2006 - link

    Oh sorry, I meant to say subjective blind listening tests. But that might be a good idea too. To avoid licensing issues, you could use public domain music. However, the quality of the client output hardware and the recording method used would taint results.
  • Duplex - Friday, March 24, 2006 - link

    A suggestion to develop the audiotest is that you measure 1. the latency from input(ad) to "software" and 2. from input(ad) to "software" to output(da) with or without some well defined effect applied.
    Realtek: We don't support ASIO & GSIF directly in our driver.
    For ASIO, there is an "universal ASIO driver for WDM audio" available on ASIO4ALL. Please refer to http://www.asio4all.com">http://www.asio4all.com. It is free for end-users.
  • Zoomer - Tuesday, March 21, 2006 - link

    If I am reading it correctly, you are saying the primary slot is the 4th from the cpu, or in the middle of the board and will cover 1 pci slot when used.

    If that is correct, I suspect this will be a deal breaker for many. It effectively transforms the board to having 1 PCI slot or even none at all, and 2 usable but useless pcie slots, 1 1x and another 8x.
  • Gary Key - Friday, March 24, 2006 - link

    quote:

    If I am reading it correctly, you are saying the primary slot is the 4th from the cpu, or in the middle of the board and will cover 1 pci slot when used.


    Yes, the primary x16 slot is the lower x16 slot on the board. If you use a X1900XT (dual slot card) as an example you will render the PCI slot next to it useless.
  • Zoomer - Saturday, March 25, 2006 - link

    Well, I think it was a bad decision on abit's part. Why leave the top part of the board free while overcrowding the bottom? End users are suffering from these strange board design because of nvidia's SLI now.

    PS: Yes, I do think SLI is a terribly bad idea.
  • Operandi - Sunday, March 12, 2006 - link

    Excellent review I particularly liked the coverage on the fan control, good work.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now