Intel Pentium 4 6xx and 3.73EE: Favoring Features Over Performanceby Anand Lal Shimpi & Derek Wilson on February 21, 2005 6:15 AM EST
- Posted in
Just last week, we saw the first tests of Intel's newest Xeon processor formerly codenamed Irwindale. The major improvement Irwindale offers over Nocona is an extra 1MB of L2 cache. Our dual processor server configuration showed the 2MB cache of the Irwindale based Xeon offering a significant improvement under certain workloads. In a shared front side bus dual processor configuration, the improved cache hit rate of the 2MB Xeon helps to keep the NetBurst architecture from getting tangled up in the length of its pipeline when working with lots of data. As an added bonus, the impact of sharing a front side bus is softened when processors find more of the data they are looking for locally. On the consumer side, Intel's 600 series doesn't have to deal with shared busses or server sized workloads. Will the 2MB L2 cache still come through and offer a significant performance improvement?
The short answer is that consumer applications running on a single processor system don't see the same kind of benefit from a 2MB L2 as do server workloads running on a DP Xeon. There are areas where performance is affected, but this time around Intel is again refining and broadening its platform rather than simply scaling up speed and power. Let's take a look at the new offerings introduced this week.
First off we've got the new Pentium 4 600 series, launched in four models:
|Model||Clock Speed||Socket||L2 Cache||FSB|
|Intel Pentium 4 660||3.6GHz||LGA-775||2MB||800MHz|
|Intel Pentium 4 650||3.4GHz||LGA-775||2MB||800MHz|
|Intel Pentium 4 640||3.2GHz||LGA-775||2MB||800MHz|
|Intel Pentium 4 630||3.0GHz||LGA-775||2MB||800MHz|
What advantage does the Pentium 4 600 offer over the 500 series? The main features are a 2MB L2 cache, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST) and EM64T support (Intel's version of AMD's x86-64). The Pentium 4 600 is still built on the same 90nm process as the Pentium 4 500, it's just got twice the cache (which we'll talk about later). Features like EIST and EM64T support were always there on previous 90nm Pentium 4s, they were simply not enabled.
Currently the 500 and 600 series chips are priced to coexist with one another, first let's have a look at what Intel's official prices are:
|Pentium 4 500 Series||Pentium 4 600 Series|
|3.8GHz (Model _70)||$637||Q2 Release|
|3.6GHz (Model _60)||$417||$605|
|3.4GHz (Model _50)||$278||$401|
|3.2GHz (Model _40)||$218||$273|
|3.0GHz (Model _30)||$178||$224|
Then let's take a look at street prices for the chips using our RealTime Pricing Engine:
|Pentium 4 500 Series (street price)||Pentium 4 600 Series (street price)|
|3.8GHz (Model _70)||$690||Q2 Release|
|3.6GHz (Model _60)||$425||$635|
|3.4GHz (Model _50)||$279||$429|
|3.2GHz (Model _40)||$231||$295|
|3.0GHz (Model _30)||$184||$257|
The other thing to note is that the 500 series still holds the clock speed crown, with the 570J running at 3.8GHz, while the fastest 600 series is a 3.6GHz Pentium 4 660. What we're seeing here is another example of Intel's move away from clock speeds as the only "improvements" from chip to chip. We will however see a 3.8GHz Pentium 4 670 in Q2 of this year.
Intel's next announcement is the move to a new 90nm core for the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition. Until now, all EE chips have been based off of the old 130nm Northwood core, but with the move up to 3.73GHz the Extreme Edition actually uses the same 90nm core as the new Pentium 4 600 series.
Giving up its 2MB L3 cache in favor of a lower latency 2MB L2 cache, the new Extreme Edition only offers two benefits over the regular Pentium 4 600 series CPUs: clock speed and 1066MHz FSB support. Priced at $999, the new Extreme Edition is priced in accordance with its name, as all of its predecessors have.
The new core, shared by both the Pentium 4 600 and the new Extreme Edition chips, is still built on the same 90nm process as the original Prescott, but thanks to the larger cache weighs in at 169 million transistors, an increase of 44 million (or 35%) over the original Prescott 1M core.
There's a decent amount to discuss with this new core, so let's start at the biggest change - the cache.