Conclusion

The hardware in the Team Group's MP34 SSD is nothing new; plenty of other brands have been selling basically the same drive for months. What's interesting about the MP34 is the newer firmware it uses for the Phison E12 controller. Some other brands have been slower to start shipping Phison's firmware updates, and many fail to offer the updates for drives that have already been sold. This is a shame, because the Team MP34 shows that Phison has continued to refine their firmware, bringing modest performance improvements with no significant sacrifices. Phison tends to offer more post-launch firmware updates than most other controller vendors. For their first generation NVMe controller, this was a necessity to remedy obvious shortcomings, but for the Phison E12 controller this continuing support is just icing on the cake.

There are only a handful of cases where the we see other drives achieving better performance out of the same Toshiba/SanDisk 3D TLC, though we expect we'd see a few more if we had the chance to test the 500GB WD Black SN750. Overall, Phison is doing a good job of handling the NAND they're working with, and the cases where their drives fall behind seem to be more often due to shortcomings with the NAND itself than with Phison's controller or firmware. Phison provides firmware to use their recent controllers with Micron NAND instead of Toshiba/SanDisk, but for this generation almost nobody is using that option. This is likely to change with their next generation of controllers, and there will probably be much more diversity among Phison E16 drives than among Phison E12 drives.

The Phison E12 is now well-established as a solid platform that can handle heavy workloads with no trouble. It doesn't set benchmark records, but it provides great performance even under adverse conditions. And for mobile users, it has employs solid power management techniques and doesn't burn a lot of power trying to be the absolute fastest.

High-End NVMe SSD Price Comparison
(May 15, 2019)
  240-280GB 480-512GB 960GB-1TB 2TB
Team Group MP34 $41.99 (16¢/GB) $74.99 (15¢/GB) $159.99 (16¢/GB)  
GIGABYTE Aorus RGB M.2 $79.99 (31¢/GB) $119.99 (23¢/GB)    
MyDigitalSSD
BPX Pro
$44.99 (19¢/GB) $79.99 (17¢/GB)   $329.99 (17¢/GB)
Corsair Force MP510 $49.99 (21¢/GB) $74.99 (16¢/GB) $134.99 (14¢/GB) $319.99 (17¢/GB)
Silicon Power P34A80 $43.99 (17¢/GB) $64.99 (13¢/GB) $129.99 (13¢/GB) $329.00 (16¢/GB)
ADATA XPG
SX8200 Pro
$54.99 (21¢/GB) $76.99 (15¢/GB) $157.99 (15¢/GB)  
HP EX950   $87.99 (17¢/GB) $159.99 (16¢/GB) $319.99 (16¢/GB)
Samsung
970 EVO Plus
$67.99 (27¢/GB) $125.64 (25¢/GB) $247.88 (25¢/GB)  
Western Digital
WD Black SN750
$68.99 (28¢/GB) $107.99 (22¢/GB) $222.99 (22¢/GB)  

For now, Phison E12 drives are largely interchangeable, with a few exceptions like the Gigabyte Aorus RGB. The Team MP34 only stands out by having a shorter three-year warranty period compared to the standard five years for this product segment. Given that shorter warranty, it needs to be a bit cheaper than the competition. At the moment, it's not really accomplishing that: the 256GB model is $2 less than the Silicon Power P34A80 that is basically the same drive with a 5-year warranty, and at higher capacities the Silicon Power drive is substantially cheaper. Which may sound like splitting hairs, but that's the challenge inherent in a commodity market like SSDs.

Phison E12 drives in general are the cheapest current-generation high-end NVMe drives on the market, which is appropriate given that they are a bit slower overall than the Silicon Motion based competitors or the top drives from Samsung and WD. Since the Phison E12 drives are still plenty fast for almost every use case and their performance is more well-rounded than the Silicon Motion SM2262EN drives, Phison drives are currently the best deals in this market segment, but the Team MP34 isn't quite the top pick from that crowd.

Flash memory prices are still in decline, but they aren't in free-fall like last year and are starting to stabilize. The transition from 64-layer 3D TLC to 9x-layer 3D TLC has slowed to a crawl, and we aren't expecting any new controllers to shake up the market in the near future. For the next few months, we expect this market segment to be relatively unchanged. A few more Phison E12 and SM2262EN drives are on the way and prices will go down a bit further, but overall things are going to be much calmer than last year.

 
Power Management
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - link

    Why is the WD Black missing from all the benchmarks - even the recently reviewed SN750 is missing?

    I’m at a loss here, you specifically mentioned it on the first page of the article, along with Samsung, yet included all the Samsung drives...
  • futrtrubl - Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - link

    Last page. "..if we had the chance to test the 500GB WD Black SN750"
  • kobblestown - Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - link

    FWIW, I just bought a 480GB Corsair MP510 and the firmware is reported as ECFM12.2. I don't know if it's available for update of older devices though.
  • ssd-user - Wednesday, May 15, 2019 - link

    Can you _please_ sort the SSD's by worst-case ("disk full") numbers rather than best-case ones? I generally really like your reviews, but your sorting is simply wrong, and some horribly bad ssd's end up looking much better than they are because of it.

    Particularly for things like the 99% latency numbers it is inane to sort by the best case, since the whole point is about near-worst-case latencies, and bad controller should simply not be given the benefit of the doubt.

    Note that unless you actually trim the ssd, even an empty filesystem will act like a full one, since the ssd doesn't know which parts are used. So as far as the ssd is concerned, it's all full. So the argument that "most people have lots of room on their disk" is quite likely bogus to begin with, but possibly entirely irrelevant even if it were to be true.
  • Death666Angel - Thursday, May 16, 2019 - link

    They are storted by worst-case, just in reverse. And if you use an SSD without an automatic trim OS, it's kinda on you, isn't it?
  • ssd-user - Thursday, May 16, 2019 - link

    Death666Angel: please learn to read. They are *not* "sorted by worst-case, just in reverse".

    Look at the "ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)" graph, just as an example.

    In particular, look at the ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB one. Look at how absolutely *HORRIBLE* the latency is for that.

    Yet the idiotic and incorrect sorting shows it as the second-best SSD on that list, because the *best-case* latency when the drive is empty is reasonable. But once it gets full, and $

    Anybody who thinks that that drive should be second-best on that list is incompetent.
  • ssd-user - Thursday, May 16, 2019 - link

    Fat-fingered the response. The "and $" should be "and garbage collection happens, latency becomes horrid".
  • Death666Angel - Saturday, May 18, 2019 - link

    I still stand by "If you have an OS that uses GC as a valid algorithm, you desever all the crap you brought upon yourself." But have fun being a blast at parties! Learn to read fricking diagrams and stop bitching. Or start being the change you wanna see in the world!
  • leexgx - Saturday, May 18, 2019 - link

    the issue is only with the dramless drives when they are above 60-70% full witch you should avoid (the sandisk/WD blue recant controller is cida dramless but it has 10mb of ram on the controller it self witch seems to be enough to mitigate the lack of a full blown dram)
  • ssd-user - Sunday, May 19, 2019 - link

    Exactly. The point is that you should avoid those drives.

    Which is why they shouldn't show up at the top of the charts. They are not top drives, they are the dregs, and they should show up as such.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now