External SSDs with a Thunderbolt 3 interface are still the only option for users looking to get high-end performance in a bus-powered portable device. These SSDs have become possible due to the emergence of NVMe drives in the compact M.2 form-factor, which are fully capable of saturating the Thunderbolt 3 interface, never mind slower interfaces like 10Gbps USB 3.x.

The TEKQ Rapide was one of the first Thunderbolt 3 external SSD that we reviewed. Since it was fairly easy to disassemble, we also presented some benchmarks of a DIY Thunderbolt 3 SSD using the TEKQ enclosure and a SanDisk Extreme Pro M.2 NVMe 3D SSD. Now, since we happen to have Western Digital's WD Black SN750 SSD in, we decided it would be interesting to take a look at the new drive in a similar scenario.

Introduction

The TEKQ Rapide is a 98mm x 45mm x 12mm silver-colored external SSD with an aluminum chassis. It sports a single Thunderbolt 3 interface for both power and data. The port is enabled by the Intel DSL6340 Thunderbolt 3 Controller - note that this belongs to the Alpine Ridge family, and hence, works only with Thunderbolt 3 Type-C ports. On the other side of the DSL6340 is a PCIe 3.0 x4 connection that leads to a M.2 slot capable of accommodating M.2 2260 or 2280 PCIe SSDs. There are no plastic components in the chassis.

There is nothing preventing advanced users from installing their own M.2 PCIe SSDs in the internal M.2 slot. The device is easy to disassemble, with four screws hidden under the rubber feet on the underside of the chassis. We took out the internal SSD (a Phison E7 reference design with Toshiba's MLC NAND) and replaced it with a 1TB version of the Western Digital WD Black SN750 M.2 NVMe SSD. The TEKQ Rapide enclosure includes thermal pads for both the M.2 SSD and the Thunderbolt 3 controller.

As a refresher, the WD Black SN750 uses Western Digital's in-house controller and couples it with 64-layer BiCS 3D TLC flash. While the SSD itself claims transfer rates of 3470 MBps reads and 3000 MBps writes, the extent of throttling introduced by the TEKQ enclosure is not immediately evident.

Benchmarks

Various synthetic benchmarks are available to quickly evaluate the performance of direct-attached storage devices. Real-world performance testing often has to be a customized test. We present both varieties in this review, starting with the synthetic benchmarks in this section. Prior to covering those, we have a quick look at our testbed setup and testing methodology.

Testbed Setup and Testing Methodology

Evaluation of DAS units on Windows is done with the testbed outlined in the table below. For devices with a Thunderbolt 3 (Type-C interface) connections (such as the DIY TEKQ Rapide - WD Black SN750 TB3 SSD 1TB that we are considering today), we utilize the USB 3.1 Type-C port enabled by the Intel Alpine Ridge controller. It connects to the Z170 PCH via a PCIe 3.0 x4 link..

AnandTech DAS Testbed Configuration
Motherboard GIGABYTE Z170X-UD5 TH ATX
CPU Intel Core i5-6600K
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4 F4-2133C15-8GRR
32 GB ( 4x 8GB)
DDR4-2133 @ 15-15-15-35
OS Drive Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 NVMe 256 GB
SATA Devices Corsair Neutron XT SSD 480 GB
Intel SSD 730 Series 480 GB
Add-on Card None
Chassis Cooler Master HAF XB EVO
PSU Cooler Master V750 750 W
OS Windows 10 Pro x64
Thanks to Cooler Master, GIGABYTE, G.Skill and Intel for the build components

The full details of the reasoning behind choosing the above build components can be found here. The list of DAS units used for comparison purposes is provided below.

  • DIY TEKQ Rapide - WD Black SN750 TB3 SSD 1TB
  • DIY TEKQ Rapide - SanDisk Extreme Pro TB3 SSD 1TB
  • MyDigitalSSD Pocket Vault Express (PVX) 1TB
  • Patriot Evlvr TB3 SSD 1TB
  • Samsung Portable SSD X5 1TB (NTFS)

ATTO and Crystal DiskMark

Western Digital claims read and write speeds of 3470 MBps and 3000 MBps respectively, but our standard ATTO test trasnfer sizes and lengths do not back up those numbers. In fact, these numbers are very close to what we obtained with the SanDisk Extreme Pro SSD. In any case, these access traces are not very common in real-life scenarios.

Drive Performance Benchmarks - ATTO

CrystalDiskMark, despite being a canned benchmark, provides a better estimate of the performance range with a selected set of numbers. As evident from the screenshot below, the performance can dip to as low as 33 MBps for 4K random reads. The sequential access numbers are slightly better than the SanDisk Extreme Pro.

Drive Performance Benchmarks - CrystalDiskMark

robocopy and PCMark 8 Storage Bench

Our testing methodology for DAS units also takes into consideration the usual use-case for such devices. The most common usage scenario is transfer of large amounts of photos and videos to and from the unit. The minor usage scenario is importing files directly off the DAS into a multimedia editing program such as Adobe Photoshop.

In order to tackle the first use-case, we created three test folders with the following characteristics:

  • Photos: 15.6 GB collection of 4320 photos (RAW as well as JPEGs) in 61 sub-folders
  • Videos: 16.1 GB collection of 244 videos (MP4 as well as MOVs) in 6 sub-folders
  • BR: 10.7 GB Blu-ray folder structure of the IDT Benchmark Blu-ray (the same that we use in our robocopy tests for NAS systems)

Photos Read

For the second use-case, we take advantage of PC Mark 8's storage bench. The storage workload involves games as well as multimedia editing applications. The command line version allows us to cherry-pick storage traces to run on a target drive. We chose the following traces.

  • Adobe Photoshop (Light)
  • Adobe Photoshop (Heavy)
  • Adobe After Effects
  • Adobe Illustrator

Usually, PC Mark 8 reports time to complete the trace, but the detailed log report has the read and write bandwidth figures which we present in our performance graphs. Note that the bandwidth number reported in the results don't involve idle time compression. Results might appear low, but that is part of the workload characteristic. Note that the same testbed is being used for all DAS units. Therefore, comparing the numbers for each trace should be possible across different DAS units.

Adobe Photoshop Light Read

In general, we find that the WD Black SN750 tracks the performance of the SanDisk Extreme Pro, but, delivers improvements in key workloads that are more representative of direct-attached storage use-cases.

Performance Consistency

Yet another interesting aspect of these types of units is performance consistency. Aspects that may influence this include thermal throttling and firmware caps on access rates to avoid overheating or other similar scenarios. This aspect is an important one, as the last thing that users want to see when copying over, say, 100 GB of data to the flash drive, is the transfer rate dropping to USB 2.0 speeds, if only momentarily.

In order to identify whether the drive under test suffers from this problem, we instrumented our robocopy DAS benchmark suite to record the flash drive's read and write transfer rates while the robocopy process took place in the background. For supported drives, we also recorded the internal temperature of the drive during the process. The graphs below show the speeds observed during our real-world DAS suite processing. The first three sets of writes and reads correspond to the photos suite. A small gap (for the transfer of the videos suite from the primary drive to the RAM drive) is followed by three sets for the next data set. Another small RAM-drive transfer gap is followed by three sets for the Blu-ray folder.

An important point to note here is that each of the first three blue and green areas correspond to 15.6 GB of writes and reads respectively. Throttling, if any, is apparent within the processing of the photos suite itself. In the whole duration of the test, the temperature of the SSD never passed 45C. Our DIY configuration doesn't exhibit any thermal throttling.

Performance Consistency and Thermal Characteristics

The comparison between the SanDisk Extreme Pro DIY configuration and the WD Black SN750 shows a marked improvement in the transfer of the set of photos. Other than that, the consistency aspects are similar.

Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

The performance consistency for real-world applications was looked at in the previous section. We recently added a test to determine the effectiveness of the thermal solution for sustained workloads. After deleting the SSD volume, a fio workload was set up to write sequential data to the raw drive with a block size of 128K and iodepth of 32 to cover 90% of the drive capacity. The internal temperature, instantaneous write data rate, and total amount of data written in total till that point of time were recorded.

Sequential Write to 90% of Disk Capacity - Performance Consistency

Three key aspects stand out - for our fio workload, the WD SN750 can go beyond 2000 MBps in the SLC cache region, while the SanDisk Extreme Pro topped out slightly north of 1800 MBps. The latter could sustain only around 1400 MBps in the steady state, while the WD Black SN750 stays at 1500 MBps right through the workload. Finally, despite the higher sustained write performance, the WD Black SN750 reached only 52C at the end of the test, while the SanDisk Extreme Pro topped out at 57C.

The above exercise also allows us to determine the SLC cache size and/or the amount of data that can be written in one shot without a drop in the write data rate. The graphs below plot the transfer rate and the total data transfer amount from the start of the fio workload to the approximate timestamp at which the transfer rate shows a significant drop.

Sustained Writes - Characteristics

The SLC cache size on both the SanDisk Extreme Pro and the WD Black SN750 seem to be around 15 - 17 GB for the 1TB model.

The peak power consumption of a bus-powered Thunderbolt 3 device can't go beyond 15W. However,it is still relevant to take a fine-grained look at the power consumption profile. Using the Plugable USBC-TKEY, the bus power consumption for the DIY TB3 SSD was tracked while the CrystalDiskMark workloads were processed. The workloads were set up with an interval time of 30s.

Drive Power Consumption - CrystalDiskMark Workloads

It is interesting to note that the SanDisk Extreme Pro has many peaks close to the 8W mark, while the WD Black SN750 tops out around 7.8W, and that too, only very briefly.

Moving on to the pricing aspect, the most cost-effective TB3 1TB SSD is currently the Patriot Evlvr, but it comes with a PCIe 3.0 x2 NVMe SSD internally. Our DIY configuration (taking out the cost of the internal SSD from the lowest-priced TEKQ Rapide) comes next, which is a huge surprise given the gulf in performance compared to the other SSDs that we are comparing against.

Price per GB

The 1TB WD Black SN750 is retailing for around $250. We may soon have standalone Thunderbolt 3 SSD enclosures from TEKQ for around $162 to aid the DIY community, but that is not the pricing assumed in the table below.

External Flash Storage Devices - Pricing
Product Model Number Capacity (GB) Street Price (USD) Price per GB (USD/GB)
Patriot Evlvr TB3 SSD 1TB PE1TTB3ECSSDR 1024 $300 0.29
DIY TEKQ Rapide - WD Black SN750 TB3 SSD 1TB N/A 1000 $247 + $250 - $45 = $452 0.452
MyDigitalSSD Pocket Vault Express (PVX) 1TB MDTB3-PVX-1T 1024 $478 0.469
DIY TEKQ Rapide - SanDisk Extreme Pro TB3 SSD 1TB N/A 1000 $247 + $272 - $45 = $407 0.479
Samsung Portable SSD X5 1TB (NTFS) MU-PB1T0B/AM 1000 $498 0.498

Coming to the business end of the review, the WD Black SN750 makes for an excellent Thunderbolt 3 SSD. Despite only being a firmware upgrade to the SanDisk Extreme Pro M.2 NVMe 3D SSD / 2nd Gen WD Black NVMe 3D SSD (2018), the drive delivers key performance improvements for typical direct-attached storage workloads. In fact, our tests show that the configuration manages to surpass many off-the-shelf Thunderbolt 3 SSDs in both performance and value aspects. We have absolutely no reservations in recommending the SSD for use in a Thunderbolt 3 SSD enclosure.

POST A COMMENT

8 Comments

View All Comments

  • Fergy - Friday, January 18, 2019 - link

    I would like to see real world testing with USB 5Gb and USB 10Gb against TB3. Probably my bias but I am not convinced that Firewire 2 (TB3) is worth it. Reply
  • akvadrako - Friday, January 18, 2019 - link

    It's much faster for random access - just compare the results with the benchmarks for Samsung T5, which is 3.1g2. Reply
  • HStewart - Thursday, February 14, 2019 - link

    First of all calling TB3 Firewire 2 is insane.

    1. TB3 is 100% compatible with USB 3.1 Gen 2
    2. TB3 is PCIe in USB-C style cable. Means that it can do much more than
    3. Firewire is over 2 decades old and they had later generations but went nowhere
    4. Primay issue is Firewire is not compatible with USB but TB3 is compatible and more

    Have check the latest (today) performance comparision with USB C Gen 2 and TB3 - in most sitiutions TB3 is between 2 to 3 times faster tyhan USB Gen 2 - which is about twice as fast as Gen 1. Take a look at Anandtech own review on Pluggable USB 3 gen drive for comparisons to this drive

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/13953/plugable-usbc...

    Price is still higher but Intel has release controller specs so one day price should go down.
    Reply
  • HStewart - Thursday, February 14, 2019 - link

    100% compatible is that computer with TB3 port will support USB C device - but this does not mean that TB3 device will run on USB-C device. I believe there is device controller that supports this that is new or coming. Reply
  • DigitalFreak - Friday, January 18, 2019 - link

    It would have been nice to see at least some of the tests used in the full SN750 review used here so a true comparison of native vs TB3 could be made. Reply
  • Magichands8 - Friday, January 18, 2019 - link

    You know, I have to admit, it does look a lot more appealing when you put it in an enclosure that looks kind of like a 2.5" drive... Reply
  • Agent Smith - Saturday, January 19, 2019 - link

    You can get an M.2 40Gbs T3 enclosure now for £106 from i-Tec.

    https://www.ballicom.co.uk/i-tec-docking-stations-...
    Reply
  • Vindvogel - Tuesday, July 09, 2019 - link

    Would really like to see a tutorial on how to place the ssd for a non-advanced user! Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now