Performance Metrics - II

In this section, we mainly look at benchmark modes in programs used on a day-to-day basis, i.e, application performance and not synthetic workloads.

x264 Benchmark

First off, we have some video encoding benchmarks courtesy of x264 HD Benchmark v5.0. This is simply a test of CPU performance. As expected, the 35W TDP Core i3-6100T and the 28W TDP Core i5-5557U take the lead over the 15W Core i5-6260U.

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 1

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 2

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression MIPS ratings when utilizing all the available threads.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

TrueCrypt

As businesses (and even home consumers) become more security conscious, the importance of encryption can't be overstated. CPUs supporting the AES-NI instruction for accelerating the encryption and decryption processes used to be restricted to high-end SKUs. That has changed now, and even the consumer-focused Core i5-6260U in the NUC6i5SYK has AES-NI support. TrueCrypt, a popular open-source disk encryption program can take advantage of the AES-NI capabilities. The TrueCrypt internal benchmark provides some interesting cryptography-related numbers to ponder. In the graph below, we can get an idea of how fast a TrueCrypt volume would behave in the Intel NUC6i5SYK and how it would compare with other select PCs. This is a purely CPU feature / clock speed based test.

TrueCrypt Benchmark

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). The benchmark takes around 50 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, others multithreaded, and some use GPUs, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, DRAM parameters and the GPU using this software.

Bringing the GPU into the picture helps the NUC6i5SYK to emerge as the Stage 2 leader, but, in other stages, the raw CPU performance is held back by the lower TDP compared to some of the other PCs in the comparison list.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the Dolphin Emulator benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities, and the higher TDP CPUs perform better.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

Performance Metrics - I Networking and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • Glock24 - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    Performance is decent, but the risk of bricking it is too high when updating the BIOS. Maybe the updated competing products will do better.
  • yuhong - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    The problems occur only with SK Hynix DDR4 chips using an older BIOS. Avoid these sticks and you should be fine.
  • Zingam - Sunday, March 13, 2016 - link

    Why is there a risk of bricking the NUC when attempting such trivial operation?
  • yuhong - Sunday, March 13, 2016 - link

    Because the processor was hanging while doing the BIOS flash operation due to a DRAM timing issue.
  • CajunArson - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    You say "Iris Graphics" and then you say that these parts have eDRAM but that's not always true.

    Intel has numerous models that have "Iris Graphics" with the largest (GT3) IGP configuration but do not include the eDRAM. Instead, Iris *Pro* Graphics has been used to designate the use of eDRAM. Do you have confirmation from Intel that this has changed or does the article need correction?
  • CajunArson - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    As a followup:

    Here's the ARK page for that i5 chip: http://ark.intel.com/products/91160/Intel-Core-i5-...

    Note "Iris Graphics 540"

    Now here's the page for the i7-5775C, which we know actually has the eDRAM in it: http://ark.intel.com/products/88040/Intel-Core-i7-...

    Note it lists "Iris Pro Graphics 6200"
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    Intel graphics comes as HD, Iris and Iris Pro.

    For Skylake, both Iris and Iris Pro use eDRAM:

    HD covers all 2+2 and 4+2 configurations (GT1 and GT2),
    Iris is 2+3e (GT3e) with 64MB of eDRAM and
    Iris Pro is 4+4e (GT4e) with 128MB of eDRAM.

    From our Skylake microarchitecture piece:
    http://images.anandtech.com/doci/9582/9%20-%20Scal...

    Obligatory Wiki link, where AnandTech is the source using Intel slides:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Gr...

    I'm more than happy to be proved wrong, if there's a GT3 without eDRAM.
  • CajunArson - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    OK, it looks like Intel has changed its naming conventions for Skylake.
    For example, both of those Broadwell NUCs have "Iris" 6100 GPUs, but they lack the eDRAM.
    It looks like Intel is pushing eDRAM into more models now, which is a good thing.
  • firewall597 - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    "My bad" are the words you are looking for.
  • dsumanik - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    lol @ nerd fights, i vote you both lose

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now