Final Words

I'll be brutally honest - while I keep a good tab on some elements of the smartphone market, more so on the business side, when it comes to deep dive analysis I leave it in the hands of Josh, Andrei and Brandon. That doesn't mean I don't need a device though, and despite their suggestions it seems I wanted a lot and wasn't prepared to spend the money. As a technical editor, my search for a smartphone caused a series of positive and negative feedback loops - some days I'd decide that DRAM was the most important, whereas others it would be the display resolution or the storage capacity. In the end it comes down to compromise and what is good and within range at the time I was looking. At one point I was adamant I wanted something more powerful than a Snapdragon 600 series, but I've ended up with a quad core MediaTek A53 device running at low frequency. There were some no-brainers – it had to be big enough and good enough to work on when I have short 20 minute public transport trips, and support dual SIM so I don’t have to keep losing my SIM card each time I travel.

The CUBOT H1 was the result of the search. It’s a smartphone that boasts 5200 mAh of battery, which is 3.4x the size of the battery in the iPhone 5c or 2x the battery in the Galaxy S6. When combined with the 1280x720 screen and the 1 GHz quad-core SoC, it gave 4 days of standard use battery which translated to 15 hours and 26 minutes on the PCMark battery test that runs from 100% to 20%, beating the Zenfone 2 by over nine hours. That is pretty much pre-2000 smartphone territory, more akin to what we used to have when playing games like Snake.

My smartphone use case has adapted over time – I want it to do work on. That means writing, switching between apps, being somewhat responsive, and always being available. The SoC means it doesn’t break any sort of record for performance, but ultimately so much of my use doesn’t require performance but rather latency in app switching and updates. Having enough memory to keep apps available means a lot, so moving up from 1GB to 2GB was a big enough change to notice, as well as the bump up to Android 5.1. The 16GB storage model is pretty basic, and the microSD compatibility is only at 32GB, rather than something bigger, and I know it will fill over time with the consistent photographing of my cats. But that is a risk that I’m going to have to take, or synchronize with Dropbox.

Without the silicone case that comes free with the phone, I will grant that despite the patterned edge, it does feel like the plastic the rear is made from, and arguably it slips out of the hand too easily. With the silicone case, it just feels like a smartphone with a case, which a lot of people use anyway. The raised power and volume buttons helps discern their location, and the fixed buttons is something I like to have on my device, even if it means giving up screen real estate.

It is clear that the cameras are not for taking glamour shots. But at a trade show, as long as you are in the front row, and have a second or two between shots, taking pictures of slides to work on later is good enough. To get a good shot taking advantage of the EIS though, you really need to use the burst mode which supports 40 shots at 13 MP each. The video is also an afterthought. That comes down to the price and what needs to be cut to meet that price. I purchased the device, brand new from Amazon, for £125 which translates to $160 pre-tax. Almost everyone I showed the phone to, probably due to the battery life argument, thought it was more expensive. The only people who guessed under (and only by $10) were a pair of senior ARM employees. But truth be told, I could buy four of these a year and it would still be cheaper than an S6. Of course, there are obvious caveats with that comparison.

I would say that this is going to be my phone for the next two years. But since I purchased it in October, two extra high end smartphones that others at AnandTech have tested have both landed on my desk for similar experiential testing. It almost seems sad to shelve the Cubot H1 immediately unless I adapt to carry two phones at once, with the H1 as that long-battery backup.

CUBOT H1
SoC Mediatek MT6735P
4x ARM Cortex-A53 at 977 MHz
ARM Mali-T720 MP2 at 400 MHz
RAM 2GB LPDDR3 at 533 MHz
Storage 16GB NAND
Display 5.5” 720p IPS
Modem 2G / 3G / 4G LTE UE Category 4
DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA2000 1x/EVDO Rev. A, EDGE
Networks

 
TDD LTE None
FDD LTE B1 / B3 / B7 / B20
UMTS 900 / 1900 / 2100
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
Dimensions 154.5 (h) x 76.6 (w) x 9.2 (d) mm,
201 grams*
Weight Measured by AnandTech, conflicting numbers online
Cameras Rear 12.8MP ( 4128 x 3096 )
Front 8MP ( 3264 x 2448 )
Battery 5200 mAh (19.76 Whr)
OS Android 5.1
Connectivity 802.11a/b/g/n 2.4GHz
BT 4.0, GPS, A-GPS, Micro-USB
SIM Size Micro-SIM (FDD-LTE, WCDMA, GSM)
Nano-SIM (GSM Only)
Also Separate MicroSD slot, up to 32GB
MSRP (UK) 16GB $160
£125 as purchased

So the final question becomes ‘how is it pronounced?’ Do we say cue-bot? Or perhaps cub-bot, or cue-bow? After writing this review, and looking at their online ‘CUBOT enterprise propaganda film’ on YouTube, it turns out to be coo-bot.

Benchmarks
Comments Locked

116 Comments

View All Comments

  • phoenix_rizzen - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    Whoops, seems I misread that. There are Cubot phones with 10,000 mAh batteries, just not this specific model.
  • f0d - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    thats awesome, 10000mah batterys should be the norm :)
    do you have a link to a cubot phone with one? my googlefu is failing me and i cant find one anywhere
  • Notmyusualid - Sunday, December 27, 2015 - link

    And no 'Edit' function, right?

    Lord knows why Anandtech will not switch to Disquss.
  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    those are non-removable.

    the one in review has removable battery >>>>> non - removables.
  • f0d - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    yes true
    BUT 10000mah.!!!
    these devices are cheap enough that if the battery does die you can just buy another phone

    removable batteries "should" be on the more expensive phones like iphones and galaxy but its the complete opposite and the more expensive phones are non removable

    i do prefer removable batteries but if it was a choice between 5500mah removable or 10000mah non removable on a super cheap phone then the 10000mah one wins in my eyes
  • Notmyusualid - Sunday, December 27, 2015 - link

    Cool devices - thanks!
  • alexdi - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    I'll never understand the drive to cheap out on a device that's practically tethered to you and is, here, a primary work device. Take the phone away from anyone under 30 and you'll see something approximating heroin withdrawal. But hey, megabucks for a few extra frames in a device you use for play in evenings? Sure, why not.
  • Ian Cutress - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    I would argue and say my PC is my primary work device. Having a smartphone I can type on (without worrying about about the battery) is secondary, and that allows me to fill in potential wasted down time.

    And yes, there are people who won't spend $400-800 on a device, even if you can justify the cost to yourself. You have to convince others against some argument of increased productively. Because ultimately if you are campaigning on the business route, it's primarily about the productivity (then arguably security, product deal or image).
  • LukaP - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    One doesnt have to convince anyone about ones choice of spending money. I for one completly agree with Ian's priorities. My computer is my primary device, meaning i will invest in it, even if it seems silly to others. On the other hand my phone is merely used for contacting people and occasionally taking notes. That means i dont need the latest and greatest Snapdragon 820 with 8GB of ram, all rendering 4K for the curved screen. I need a good looking screen, 720p so all the stuff can be displayed on it, and a capable enough SOC so that it doesnt bog down when im listening to music while typing on the go, and someone calls me. Im not going to be spending more than about 100-150€ on a device that to me, doesnt deserve such an investment. But its perfectly understandable that some people desire/need more, and will also invest more there :)
  • ssj4Gogeta - Wednesday, December 23, 2015 - link

    Though mention a couple of times that you were using black text on white. But that shouldn't matter for LCDs. Or are you referring to content-adaptive backlight saving you battery when using white on black?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now